2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of the inner side and two-sided approaches for iliac crest bone graft harvesting for pediatric pelvic osteotomy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The iliac crest is one of the most used bone graft sources. In this study, we aimed to identify the effects of inner side and two-sided approaches for iliac crest bone harvesting on post-surgery ilium growth in children.

          Materials and methods

          We retrospectively analyzed 47 patients who underwent pelvic osteotomy and iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) procedures from January 2015 to September 2018. The patients were divided into an inner table ilium exposure group (group A) and the inner-outer table ilium exposure group (group B) and were followed up with radiography in postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12, and the growth areas were measured using PACS software. Complications such as damage to the arteries or nerves, ureteral injury, gastrointestinal hernia, ileus, abnormal cosmetic appearance, sensory disturbances, and functional limitations were recorded based on clinical records.

          Results

          There were 22 patients aged 5.3±1.5 years in group A and 25 patients aged 5.9±1.8 years in group B. There were no significant differences in demographics between the two groups, or in growth in the first month. However, bone graft growth at months 3, 6, and 12 was significantly better in group A than in group B. There was no significant difference in complications between the two groups.

          Conclusion

          Exposure of only the inner table of the ilium resulted in faster recovery of the bone defect than two-sided exposure in pelvic osteotomy. Therefore, we suggest protecting the outer side of the ilium during surgery.

          Level of evidence

          Level III

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Comparison of anterior and posterior iliac crest bone grafts in terms of harvest-site morbidity and functional outcomes.

          Previous studies have demonstrated high complication rates after harvest of iliac crest bone grafts. This study was undertaken to compare the morbidity related to the harvest of anterior iliac crest bone graft with that related to the harvest of posterior iliac crest bone graft and to determine differences in functional outcome. The medical records of eighty-eight consecutive patients who had undergone a total of 108 iliac crest bone-grafting procedures for the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis from 1991 to 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic characteristics, the location of the harvest, the volume of bone graft that was harvested, the estimated blood loss, and postoperative complications were recorded. Fifty-eight patients completed a questionnaire pertaining to postoperative and residual pain, sensory disturbances, functional limitations, cosmetic appearance, and overall satisfaction with the bone-graft harvesting procedure. Sixty-six anterior and forty-two posterior bone-graft harvest sites were evaluated at a minimum of two years after the operation. A major complication was associated with 8% (five) of the sixty-six anterior sites and 2% (one) of the forty-two posterior sites. The rates of minor complications were 15% (ten) and 0%, respectively. In the series as a whole, there were ten minor complications (9%) and six major complications (6%). The rates of both minor complications (p = 0.006) and all complications (p = 0.004) were significantly higher after the anterior harvest procedures than they were after the posterior procedures. The postoperative pain at the donor site was significantly more severe (p = 0.0016) and of significantly greater duration (p = 0.0017) after the anterior harvests. No patient reported functional limitations at the latest follow-up evaluation. In this series, the complication rate was lower than those previously reported by other investigators. Harvest of a posterior iliac crest bone graft was associated with a significantly lower risk of postoperative complications. On the basis of the results of this study, we recommend that iliac crest bone graft be harvested posteriorly whenever possible.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Autograft and nonunions: morbidity with intramedullary bone graft versus iliac crest bone graft.

            This article focuses on comparing patient morbidity with harvesting bone graft for the treatment of nonunions from three different sites. Anterior iliac crest graft is the most commonly used site; however, the posterior iliac crest and intramedullary canal provide greater quantities of bone. The anterior and posterior iliac crests also have some donor site complications such as nerve injury and persistent pain. The intramedullary canal, when compared with anterior and posterior iliac crest, offers the largest quantity of bone graft with the least amount of patient donor site morbidity. The intramedullary canal also appears to be a bone graft source that can be reharvested, unlike the anterior and posterior iliac crest donor sites.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Donor Site Morbidity After Anterior Iliac Bone Graft Harvesting.

              The objective of this study was to evaluate donor site morbidity associated with anterior iliac crest bone graft harvesting for orthopaedic trauma reconstructions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                b2309@126.com
                chenkai@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn
                suyuxi@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn
                Journal
                J Orthop Surg Res
                J Orthop Surg Res
                Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1749-799X
                3 March 2021
                3 March 2021
                2021
                : 16
                : 169
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.488412.3, Department of Radiology, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, , Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, ; Chongqing, People’s Republic of China
                [2 ]GRID grid.488412.3, Department II of Orthopedics, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation base of Child development and Critical Disorders, , Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, ; Yuzhong District Zhongshan 2road 136#, Chongqing, 400014 China
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1904-5594
                Article
                2318
                10.1186/s13018-021-02318-4
                7927372
                b8eb6aad-b28e-4f8a-af4e-0c47753020f9
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 16 January 2021
                : 22 February 2021
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Surgery
                pelvic osteotomy,developmental dysplasia of the hip,iliac crest bone graft
                Surgery
                pelvic osteotomy, developmental dysplasia of the hip, iliac crest bone graft

                Comments

                Comment on this article