66
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sanpodo controls sensory organ precursor fate by directing Notch trafficking and binding γ-secretase

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In sensory organ precursor cells, Sanpodo can enhance or suppress Notch signaling by promoting interaction with Presenilin or driving receptor internalization, respectively.

          Abstract

          In Drosophila peripheral neurogenesis, Notch controls cell fates in sensory organ precursor (SOP) cells. SOPs undergo asymmetric cell division by segregating Numb, which inhibits Notch signaling, into the pIIb daughter cell after cytokinesis. In contrast, in the pIIa daughter cell, Notch is activated and requires Sanpodo, but its mechanism of action has not been elucidated. As Sanpodo is present in both pIIa and pIIb cells, a second role for Sanpodo in regulating Notch signaling in the low-Notch pIIb cell has been proposed. Here we demonstrate that Sanpodo regulates Notch signaling levels in both pIIa and pIIb cells via distinct mechanisms. The interaction of Sanpodo with Presenilin, a component of the γ-secretase complex, was required for Notch activation and pIIa cell fate. In contrast, Sanpodo suppresses Notch signaling in the pIIb cell by driving Notch receptor internalization. Together, these results demonstrate that a single protein can regulate Notch signaling through distinct mechanisms to either promote or suppress signaling depending on the local cellular context.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Signals for sorting of transmembrane proteins to endosomes and lysosomes.

          Sorting of transmembrane proteins to endosomes and lysosomes is mediated by signals present within the cytosolic domains of the proteins. Most signals consist of short, linear sequences of amino acid residues. Some signals are referred to as tyrosine-based sorting signals and conform to the NPXY or YXXO consensus motifs. Other signals known as dileucine-based signals fit [DE]XXXL[LI] or DXXLL consensus motifs. All of these signals are recognized by components of protein coats peripherally associated with the cytosolic face of membranes. YXXO and [DE]XXXL[LI] signals are recognized with characteristic fine specificity by the adaptor protein (AP) complexes AP-1, AP-2, AP-3, and AP-4, whereas DXXLL signals are recognized by another family of adaptors known as GGAs. Several proteins, including clathrin, AP-2, and Dab2, have been proposed to function as recognition proteins for NPXY signals. YXXO and DXXLL signals bind in an extended conformation to the mu2 subunit of AP-2 and the VHS domain of the GGAs, respectively. Phosphorylation events regulate signal recognition. In addition to peptide motifs, ubiquitination of cytosolic lysine residues also serves as a signal for sorting at various stages of the endosomal-lysosomal system. Conjugated ubiquitin is recognized by UIM, UBA, or UBC domains present within many components of the internalization and lysosomal targeting machinery. This complex array of signals and recognition proteins ensures the dynamic but accurate distribution of transmembrane proteins to different compartments of the endosomal-lysosomal system.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Asymmetric cell division: recent developments and their implications for tumour biology.

            The ability of cells to divide asymmetrically is essential for generating diverse cell types during development. The past 10 years have seen tremendous progress in our understanding of this important biological process. We have learned that localized phosphorylation events are responsible for the asymmetric segregation of cell fate determinants in mitosis and that centrosomes and microtubules play important parts in this process. The relevance of asymmetric cell division for stem cell biology has added a new dimension to the field, and exciting connections between asymmetric cell division and tumorigenesis have begun to emerge.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Asymmetric distribution of numb protein during division of the sensory organ precursor cell confers distinct fates to daughter cells.

              The four cells of an external sense organ in the Drosophila peripheral nervous system, the neuron, its sheath cell, and two "outer support cells" that form the hair and socket, are derived from a common precursor, the sensory organ precursor (SOP), after two rounds of division. We determined by immunocytochemistry that numb is a membrane-associated protein which localizes asymmetrically to one-half of the predivisional SOP cell. Upon division, numb segregates differentially to one daughter. Loss of numb function causes the descendants of the SOP to differentiate inappropriately, producing four outer support cells and no neuron or sheath. Ectopic expression of numb during the time of SOP division results in a transformation that is opposite to the null mutant transformation. Thus, numb functions to determine the fates of the secondary precursors; the differential distribution of numb as the SOP divides generates an asymmetric division in which the daughter cells acquire distinct identities.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Cell Biol
                J. Cell Biol
                jcb
                The Journal of Cell Biology
                The Rockefeller University Press
                0021-9525
                1540-8140
                29 April 2013
                : 201
                : 3
                : 439-448
                Affiliations
                Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Fabrice Roegiers: fabrice.roegiers@ 123456fccc.edu
                Article
                201209023
                10.1083/jcb.201209023
                3639393
                23609534
                b91c873d-4329-4870-b895-57c196024930
                © 2013 Upadhyay et al.

                This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).

                History
                : 5 September 2012
                : 27 March 2013
                Categories
                Research Articles
                Article

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article