89
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Expanding protection motivation theory: investigating an application to animal owners and emergency responders in bushfire emergencies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) was developed by Rogers in 1975, to describe how individuals are motivated to react in a self-protective way towards a perceived health threat. Rogers expected the use of PMT to diversify over time, which has proved true over four decades. The purpose of this paper is to explore how PMT can be used and expanded to inform and improve public safety strategies in natural hazards. As global climate change impacts on the Australian environment, natural hazards seem to be increasing in scale and frequency, and Emergency Services’ public education campaigns have necessarily escalated to keep pace with perceived public threat. Of concern, is that the awareness-preparedness gap in residents’ survival plans is narrowing disproportionately slowly compared to the magnitude of resources applied to rectify this trend. Practical applications of adaptable social theory could be used to help resolve this dilemma.

          Discussion

          PMT has been used to describe human behaviour in individuals, families, and the parent-child unit. It has been applied to floods in Europe and wildfire and earthquake in the United States. This paper seeks to determine if an application of PMT can be useful for achieving other-directed human protection across a novel demographic spectrum in natural hazards, specifically, animal owners and emergency responders in bushfire emergencies.

          These groups could benefit from such an approach: owners to build and fortify their response- and self-efficacy, and to help translate knowledge into safer behaviour, and responders to gain a better understanding of a diverse demographic with animal ownership as its common denominator, and with whom they will be likely to engage in contemporary natural hazard management. Mutual collaboration between these groups could lead to a synergy of reciprocated response efficacy, and safer, less traumatic outcomes.

          Summary

          Emergency services’ community education programs have made significant progress over the last decade, but public safety remains suboptimal while the magnitude of the awareness-preparedness gap persists. This paper examines an expanded, other-directed application of PMT to expand and enhance safer mitigation and response behaviour strategies for communities threatened by bushfire, which may ultimately help save human life.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Meta-Analysis of Research on Protection Motivation Theory

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The protective action decision model: theoretical modifications and additional evidence.

              The Protective Action Decision Model (PADM) is a multistage model that is based on findings from research on people's responses to environmental hazards and disasters. The PADM integrates the processing of information derived from social and environmental cues with messages that social sources transmit through communication channels to those at risk. The PADM identifies three critical predecision processes (reception, attention, and comprehension of warnings or exposure, attention, and interpretation of environmental/social cues)--that precede all further processing. The revised model identifies three core perceptions--threat perceptions, protective action perceptions, and stakeholder perceptions--that form the basis for decisions about how to respond to an imminent or long-term threat. The outcome of the protective action decision-making process, together with situational facilitators and impediments, produces a behavioral response. In addition to describing the revised model and the research on which it is based, this article describes three applications (development of risk communication programs, evacuation modeling, and adoption of long-term hazard adjustments) and identifies some of the research needed to address unresolved issues. © 2011 Society for Risk Analysis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                R.Westcott@westernsydney.edu.au
                K.Ronan@cqu.edu.au
                h.bambrick@qut.edu.au
                mel.taylor@mq.edu.au
                Journal
                BMC Psychol
                BMC Psychol
                BMC Psychology
                BioMed Central (London )
                2050-7283
                26 April 2017
                26 April 2017
                2017
                : 5
                : 13
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, GRID grid.1013.3, Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine, , Western Sydney University, ; Campbelltown Sydney, Australia
                [2 ]GRID grid.468519.7, , Bushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre, ; Melbourne, Australia
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2193 0854, GRID grid.1023.0, Clinical Psychology, School of Health, , Medical and Applied Sciences Central Queensland University, ; Rockhampton, QLD Australia
                [4 ]ISNI 0000000089150953, GRID grid.1024.7, School of Public Health and Social Work, , Queensland University of Technology, ; Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, QLD Australia
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2158 5405, GRID grid.1004.5, Department of Psychology, , Macquarie University, ; Sydney, Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5706-6786
                Article
                182
                10.1186/s40359-017-0182-3
                5406887
                28446229
                b942c001-84ad-4503-a224-7a976e2c106f
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 15 August 2016
                : 11 April 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: Bushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre
                Categories
                Debate
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                protection motivation theory,animals,animal owners,emergency responders,bushfire,wildfire,natural hazards,preparedness

                Comments

                Comment on this article