7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Statistical Learning and Inference Is Impaired in the Nonclinical Continuum of Psychosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Our perceptions result from the brain's ability to make inferences, or predictive models, of sensory information. Recently, it has been proposed that psychotic traits may be linked to impaired predictive processes. Here, we examine the brain dynamics underlying statistical learning and inference in stable and volatile environments, in a population of healthy human individuals ( N = 75; 36 males, 39 females) with a range of psychotic-like experiences. We measured prediction error responses to sound sequences with electroencephalography, gauged sensory inference explicitly by behaviorally recording sensory statistical learning errors, and used dynamic causal modeling to tap into the underlying neural circuitry. We discuss the findings that were robust to replication across the two experiments (Discovery dataset, N = 31; Validation dataset, N = 44). First, we found that during stable conditions, participants demonstrated greater precision in their predictive model, reflected in a larger prediction error response to unexpected sounds, and decreased statistical learning errors. Moreover, individuals with attenuated prediction errors in stable conditions were found to make greater incorrect predictions about sensory information. Critically, we show that greater errors in statistical learning and inference are related to increased psychotic-like experiences. These findings link neurophysiology to behavior during statistical learning and prediction formation, as well as providing further evidence for the idea of a continuum of psychosis in the healthy, nonclinical population.

          SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT While perceiving the world, we make inferences by learning the statistics present in the sensory environment. It has been argued that psychosis may emerge because of a failure to learn sensory statistics, resulting in an impaired representation of the world. Recently, it has been proposed that psychosis exists on a continuum; however, there is conflicting evidence on whether sensory learning deficits align on the nonclinical end of the psychosis continuum. We found that statistical learning of sensory events is associated with the magnitude of mismatch negativity and, critically, is impaired in healthy people who report more psychotic-like experiences. We replicated these findings in an independent sample, demonstrating strengthened credibility to support the continuum of psychosis that extends into the nonclinical population.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Neurosci
          J. Neurosci
          jneuro
          jneurosci
          J. Neurosci
          The Journal of Neuroscience
          Society for Neuroscience
          0270-6474
          1529-2401
          26 August 2020
          26 February 2021
          : 40
          : 35
          : 6759-6769
          Affiliations
          [1] 1Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Victoria, Australia
          [2] 2Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Queensland, Australia
          [3] 3Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, Clayton 3800, Victoria, Australia
          [4] 4Centre for Advanced Imaging, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Queensland, Australia
          [5] 5Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrueck, 49074 Osnabrueck, Germany
          Author notes
          Correspondence should be addressed to Ilvana Dzafic at ilvana.dzafic@ 123456unimelb.edu.au

          Author contributions: I.D. and M.I.G. designed research; I.D., C.D.H., and M.B. performed research; I.D. and R.R. analyzed data; I.D. wrote the paper.

          Author information
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1101-0736
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1340-750X
          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0321-2864
          https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0679-4959
          Article
          PMC7455217 PMC7455217 7455217 JN-RM-0315-20
          10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0315-20.2020
          7455217
          32690617
          b94a53dd-e39c-41d3-82f1-c18b69800edd
          Copyright © 2020 the authors

          SfN exclusive license.

          History
          : 11 February 2020
          : 23 June 2020
          : 30 June 2020
          Funding
          Funded by: http://doi.org/10.13039/501100000923Australian Research Council (ARC)
          Award ID: CE140100007
          Funded by: http://doi.org/10.13039/501100001794University of Queensland (UQ)
          Award ID: 2016000071
          Funded by: University of Queensland International Research Scholarship
          Categories
          Research Articles
          Behavioral/Cognitive

          volatility,inference,prediction error,psychosis continuum,statistical learning

          Comments

          Comment on this article