11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Transfer of plant protection products from raspberry crops of Laszka and Seedling varieties to beehives

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Field studies were conducted to evaluate the transfer of active ingredients (AIs) of plant protection products (PPPs) to beehives. They were applied in two commodity red raspberry plantations of two varieties: Laszka (experiment 1) and Seedling (experiment 2). Samples of flowers, leaves, bees, brood, and honey were examined for the presence of chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin, difenoconazole, cyprodinil, and trifloxystrobin (experiment 1) and chlorpyrifos, boscalid, pyraclostrobin, cypermethrin, difenoconazole, and azoxystrobin (experiment 2). In experiment 1, the highest levels of trifloxystrobin were observed on the surface of flowers, (0.04 μg/flower) and for difenoconazole on the inside (0.023 μg/flower). Leaves contained only trace residues of cypermethrin and cyprodinil (0.001 μg/cm 2 of leaves each) and trifloxystrobin (0.01 μg/cm 2 of leaves) on the surface; inside the leaves, the highest levels of trifloxystrobin were observed (0.042 μg/cm 2 of leaves). In experiment 2, boscalid was found on the surface and inside the flowers and leaves (0.063 and 0.018 μg/flower and 0.057 and 0.033 μg/cm 2 of leaves, respectively). In bees, brood, and honey (experiment 1), chlorpyrifos was present in the highest quantity (7.3, 1.6, and 4.7 μg/kg, respectively). Additionally, cypermethrin and trifloxystrobin were found in bees, and trifloxystrobin was present in honey. Bees, brood, and honey from plantation 2 contained all studied AIs, with the highest levels of boscalid (28.6 μg/kg of bees, 37.0 μg/kg of brood, and 33.9 μg/kg of honey, respectively). In no case did the PPP residues in honey exceed acceptable maximum residue levels (MRLs)—from a formal and legal point of view, in terms of the used plant protection products, the analysed honey was fit for human consumption.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Mechanism for the differential toxicity of neonicotinoid insecticides in the honey bee, Apis mellifera

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Four Common Pesticides, Their Mixtures and a Formulation Solvent in the Hive Environment Have High Oral Toxicity to Honey Bee Larvae

            Recently, the widespread distribution of pesticides detected in the hive has raised serious concerns about pesticide exposure on honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) health. A larval rearing method was adapted to assess the chronic oral toxicity to honey bee larvae of the four most common pesticides detected in pollen and wax - fluvalinate, coumaphos, chlorothalonil, and chloropyrifos - tested alone and in all combinations. All pesticides at hive-residue levels triggered a significant increase in larval mortality compared to untreated larvae by over two fold, with a strong increase after 3 days of exposure. Among these four pesticides, honey bee larvae were most sensitive to chlorothalonil compared to adults. Synergistic toxicity was observed in the binary mixture of chlorothalonil with fluvalinate at the concentrations of 34 mg/L and 3 mg/L, respectively; whereas, when diluted by 10 fold, the interaction switched to antagonism. Chlorothalonil at 34 mg/L was also found to synergize the miticide coumaphos at 8 mg/L. The addition of coumaphos significantly reduced the toxicity of the fluvalinate and chlorothalonil mixture, the only significant non-additive effect in all tested ternary mixtures. We also tested the common ‘inert’ ingredient N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone at seven concentrations, and documented its high toxicity to larval bees. We have shown that chronic dietary exposure to a fungicide, pesticide mixtures, and a formulation solvent have the potential to impact honey bee populations, and warrants further investigation. We suggest that pesticide mixtures in pollen be evaluated by adding their toxicities together, until complete data on interactions can be accumulated.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Honey bee toxicology.

              Insecticides are chemicals used to kill insects, so it is unsurprising that many insecticides have the potential to harm honey bees (Apis mellifera). However, bees are exposed to a great variety of other potentially toxic chemicals, including flavonoids and alkaloids that are produced by plants; mycotoxins produced by fungi; antimicrobials and acaricides that are introduced by beekeepers; and fungicides, herbicides, and other environmental contaminants. Although often regarded as uniquely sensitive to toxic compounds, honey bees are adapted to tolerate and even thrive in the presence of toxic compounds that occur naturally in their environment. The harm caused by exposure to a particular concentration of a toxic compound may depend on the level of simultaneous exposure to other compounds, pathogen levels, nutritional status, and a host of other factors. This review takes a holistic view of bee toxicology by taking into account the spectrum of xenobiotics to which bees are exposed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +48 56 611-26-34 , grodzick@umk.pl
                Journal
                Environ Monit Assess
                Environ Monit Assess
                Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                0167-6369
                1573-2959
                12 February 2018
                12 February 2018
                2018
                : 190
                : 3
                : 135
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2154 3176, GRID grid.13856.39, Faculty of Biotechnology, Department of Analytical Chemistry, , University of Rzeszów, ; Pigonia 1, 35-310 Rzeszów, Poland
                [2 ]Laboratory for Research on Pesticide Residues, Institute of Plant Protection-National Research Institute, Langiewicza 28, 35-101 Rzeszów, Poland
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0943 6490, GRID grid.5374.5, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, , Nicolaus Copernicus University, ; Lwowska 1, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8397-8711
                Article
                6491
                10.1007/s10661-018-6491-z
                5809555
                29435675
                b95da794-d5bc-42e6-8772-f71d42d1813b
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 13 June 2017
                : 22 January 2018
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

                General environmental science
                raspberries,honeybees,plant protection products,pesticide residues,consumption safety

                Comments

                Comment on this article