76
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Working memory load disrupts gaze-cued orienting of attention

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A large body of work has shown that a perceived gaze shift produces a shift in a viewer’s spatial attention in the direction of the seen gaze. A controversial issue surrounds the extent to which this gaze-cued orienting effect is stimulus-driven, or is under a degree of top-down control. In two experiments we show that the gaze-cued orienting effect is disrupted by a concurrent task that has been shown to place high demands on executive resources: random number generation (RNG). In Experiment 1 participants were faster to locate targets that appeared in gaze-cued locations relative to targets that appeared in locations opposite to those indicated by the gaze shifts, while simultaneously and continuously reciting aloud the digits 1–9 in order; however, this gaze-cueing effect was eliminated when participants continuously recited the same digits in a random order. RNG was also found to interfere with gaze-cued orienting in Experiment 2 where participants performed a speeded letter identification response. Together, these data suggest that gaze-cued orienting is actually under top-down control. We argue that top-down signals sustain a goal to shift attention in response to gazes, such that orienting ordinarily occurs when they are perceived; however, the goal cannot always be maintained when concurrent, multiple, competing goals are simultaneously active in working memory.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The mental representation of parity and number magnitude.

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.

            In 2 experiments the authors examined whether individual differences in working-memory (WM) capacity are related to attentional control. Experiment 1 tested high- and low-WM-span (high-span and low-span) participants in a prosaccade task, in which a visual cue appeared in the same location as a subsequent to-be-identified target letter, and in an antisaccade task, in which a target appeared opposite the cued location. Span groups identified targets equally well in the prosaccade task, reflecting equivalence in automatic orienting. However, low-span participants were slower and less accurate than high-span participants in the antisaccade task, reflecting differences in attentional control. Experiment 2 measured eye movements across a long antisaccade session. Low-span participants made slower and more erroneous saccades than did high-span participants. In both experiments, low-span participants performed poorly when task switching from antisaccade to prosaccade blocks. The findings support a controlled-attention view of WM capacity.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption.

              To study the mechanisms underlying covert orienting of attention in visual space, subjects were given advance cues indicating the probable locations of targets that they had to discriminate and localize. Direct peripheral cues (brightening of one of four boxes in peripheral vision) and symbolic central cues (an arrow at the fixation point indicating a probable peripheral box) were compared. Peripheral and central cues are believed to activate different reflexive and voluntary modes of orienting (Jonides, 1981; Posner, 1980). Experiment 1 showed that the time courses of facilitation and inhibition from peripheral and central cues were characteristic and different. Experiment 2 showed that voluntary orienting in response to symbolic central cues is interrupted by reflexive orienting to random peripheral flashes. Experiment 3 showed that irrelevant peripheral flashes also compete with relevant peripheral cues. The amount of interference varied systematically with the interval between the onset of the relevant cue and of the distracting flash (cue-flash onset asynchrony) and with the cuing condition. Taken together, these effects support a model for spatial attention with distinct but interacting reflexive and voluntary orienting mechanisms.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                24 August 2015
                2015
                : 6
                : 1258
                Affiliations
                School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling , Stirling, UK
                Author notes

                Edited by: Andrew Bayliss, University of East Anglia, UK

                Reviewed by: Nathalie George, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France; Ramesh K. Mishra, University of Hyderabad, India

                *Correspondence: Stephen R. H. Langton, School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK, stephen.langton@ 123456stir.ac.uk

                This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology.

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01258
                4547003
                26379587
                b9c1fe0e-a5a9-4652-81e7-08aa4df47dce
                Copyright © 2015 Bobak and Langton.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 24 April 2015
                : 05 August 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 57, Pages: 11, Words: 10026
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                gaze-cued attention,working memory,top-down control,random number generation,executive load

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log