16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Self-Testing Is a Feasible and Acceptable Option for Identifying Extra-genital Gonorrhea (GC) and Chlamydia (CT) infections in HIV-Infected Persons

      abstract

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Compliance with guidelines recommending extra-genital testing for GC/CT in HIV-infected men who have sex with men is variable. Proposed barriers to testing, such as patient reluctance and provider discomfort, could be eliminated by self-testing. In this study, we evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of extra-genital self-testing and assess the adequacy of an oral rinse for the diagnosis of GC/CT infections.

          Methods

          HIV-infected subjects receiving care at one of three military treatment facilities participated in this study. Subjects received standardized instructions on sample collection and participated in a questionnaire designed to evaluate acceptability of this method. In addition, all subjects underwent testing by their provider. Gen Probe Aptima Combo 2 assay was used for testing the swabs and the rinse.

          Results

          A total of 148 HIV-infected subjects (median age 43 years, 40% African-Americans and 35% Caucasians) enrolled in the study. Test results are tabulated below. Of the 126 oral rinses tested, 6 (4.7%) tested positive for GC and 1 for CT (0.8%). Of the 6 rinses testing positive for GC, 2 tested negative on concomitantly collected swabs, and 1 swab testing positive for GC was negative on the rinse. Of note, 2 swabs testing positive for GC on self-collection but negative on provider swabs tested positive on the rinse. Over 95% of the subjects indicated that they understood the instructions and had collected the swabs as instructed. Most subjects (≥90%) indicated that they were comfortable collecting the swabs and oral rinses at home. Approximately15% of the subjects preferred that their providers collected the swabs.

          Conclusion

          In this study, self-collected samples yielded more positive results than provider collected samples, and the performance of oral rinses and pharyngeal swabs were similar. Our results suggest self-testing is a feasible and acceptable method for collecting extra-genital samples. Adoption of self-testing could improve compliance with the guidelines.

          Test Results By Anatomical Site and Collection Method
          Provider Self Self Provider
          Rectal GC 5 (3.4%) 5 (3.4%) Concordant Pharyngeal GC 8 (5.4%) 6 (4.1%) Discordant
          Rectal CT 4 (2.7%) 6 (4.1%) Discordant Pharyngeal CT 1 (0.7%) 2 (1.3%) Discordant
          Disclosures

          All authors: No reported disclosures.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          ofid
          Open Forum Infectious Diseases
          Oxford University Press (US )
          2328-8957
          Fall 2017
          04 October 2017
          04 October 2017
          : 4
          : Suppl 1 , ID Week 2017 Abstracts
          : S668
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine , Bethesda, Maryland
          [2 ] Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Rock, Maryland
          [3 ] Walter Reed National Military Medical Center , Bethesda, Maryland
          [4 ] Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, Maryland
          [5 ] Naval Medical Center San Diego , San Diego, California
          [6 ] San Antonio Military Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
          [7 ] Division of Infectious Diseases, Naval Medical Center San Diego , San Diego, California
          [8 ] Walter Reed Military Medical Center , Bethesda, Maryland
          [9 ] Infectious Disease, San Antonio Military Medical Center , Fort Sam Houston, Texas
          Author notes

          Session: 248. HIV: Sexually Transmitted Infections

          Saturday, October 7, 2017: 12:30 PM

          Article
          ofx163.1783
          10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1783
          5631222
          b9e14107-ac27-4be5-88f0-35df41988cab
          © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

          History
          Page count
          Pages: 1
          Categories
          Abstracts
          Poster Abstract

          Comments

          Comment on this article