2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Single-cell qPCR on dispersed primary pituitary cells -an optimized protocol

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 2 , 1 , 2 ,
      BMC Molecular Biology
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The incidence of false positives is a potential problem in single-cell PCR experiments. This paper describes an optimized protocol for single-cell qPCR measurements in primary pituitary cell cultures following patch-clamp recordings. Two different cell harvesting methods were assessed using both the GH 4 prolactin producing cell line from rat, and primary cell culture from fish pituitaries.

          Results

          Harvesting whole cells followed by cell lysis and qPCR performed satisfactory on the GH 4 cell line. However, harvesting of whole cells from primary pituitary cultures regularly produced false positives, probably due to RNA leakage from cells ruptured during the dispersion of the pituitary cells. To reduce RNA contamination affecting the results, we optimized the conditions by harvesting only the cytosol through a patch pipette, subsequent to electrophysiological experiments. Two important factors proved crucial for reliable harvesting. First, silanizing the patch pipette glass prevented foreign extracellular RNA from attaching to charged residues on the glass surface. Second, substituting the commonly used perforating antibiotic amphotericin B with β-escin allowed efficient cytosol harvest without loosing the giga seal. Importantly, the two harvesting protocols revealed no difference in RNA isolation efficiency.

          Conclusion

          Depending on the cell type and preparation, validation of the harvesting technique is extremely important as contaminations may give false positives. Here we present an optimized protocol allowing secure harvesting of RNA from single cells in primary pituitary cell culture following perforated whole cell patch clamp experiments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences.

          Gene expression is a fundamentally stochastic process, with randomness in transcription and translation leading to cell-to-cell variations in mRNA and protein levels. This variation appears in organisms ranging from microbes to metazoans, and its characteristics depend both on the biophysical parameters governing gene expression and on gene network structure. Stochastic gene expression has important consequences for cellular function, being beneficial in some contexts and harmful in others. These situations include the stress response, metabolism, development, the cell cycle, circadian rhythms, and aging.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Detection, clinical relevance and specific biological properties of disseminating tumour cells.

            Most cancer deaths are caused by haematogenous metastatic spread and subsequent growth of tumour cells at distant organs. Disseminating tumour cells present in the peripheral blood and bone marrow can now be detected and characterized at the single-cell level. These cells are highly relevant to the study of the biology of early metastatic spread and provide a diagnostic source in patients with overt metastases. Here we review the evidence that disseminating tumour cells have a variety of uses for understanding tumour biology and improving cancer treatment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Laser capture microdissection.

              Laser capture microdissection (LCM) under direct microscopic visualization permits rapid one-step procurement of selected human cell populations from a section of complex, heterogeneous tissue. In this technique, a transparent thermoplastic film (ethylene vinyl acetate polymer) is applied to the surface of the tissue section on a standard glass histopathology slide; a carbon dioxide laser pulse then specifically activates the film above the cells of interest. Strong focal adhesion allows selective procurement of the targeted cells. Multiple examples of LCM transfer and tissue analysis, including polymerase chain reaction amplification of DNA and RNA, and enzyme recovery from transferred tissue are demonstrated.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Mol Biol
                BMC Molecular Biology
                BioMed Central
                1471-2199
                2010
                12 November 2010
                : 11
                : 82
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Department of Basic Sciences and Aquatic Medicine, PO Box 8146 Dep, 0033 Oslo, Norway
                [2 ]University of Oslo, Department of Molecular Biosciences, PO Box 1041 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway
                Article
                1471-2199-11-82
                10.1186/1471-2199-11-82
                2994858
                21073722
                ba7d91cd-f2ad-451b-83a8-4192dd57e908
                Copyright ©2010 Hodne et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 July 2010
                : 12 November 2010
                Categories
                Methodology Article

                Molecular biology
                Molecular biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article