16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Seroepidemiology of Selected Alphaviruses and Flaviviruses in Bats in Trinidad

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          A serosurvey of antibodies against selected flaviviruses and alphaviruses in 384 bats (representing 10 genera and 14 species) was conducted in the Caribbean island of Trinidad. Sera were analysed using epitope‐blocking enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays ( ELISAs) specific for antibodies against West Nile virus ( WNV), Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus ( VEEV) and eastern equine encephalitis virus ( EEEV), all of which are zoonotic viruses of public health significance in the region. Overall, the ELISAs resulted in the detection of VEEV‐specific antibodies in 11 (2.9%) of 384 bats. Antibodies to WNV and EEEV were not detected in any sera. Of the 384 sera, 308 were also screened using hemagglutination inhibition assay ( HIA) for antibodies to the aforementioned viruses as well as St. Louis encephalitis virus ( SLEV; which also causes epidemic disease in humans), Rio Bravo virus ( RBV), Tamana bat virus ( TABV) and western equine encephalitis virus ( WEEV). Using this approach, antibodies to TABV and RBV were detected in 47 (15.3%) and 3 (1.0%) bats, respectively. HIA results also suggest the presence of antibodies to an undetermined flavivirus(es) in 8 (2.6%) bats. Seropositivity for TABV was significantly ( P < 0.05; χ 2) associated with bat species, location and feeding preference, and for VEEV with roost type and location. Differences in prevalence rates between urban and rural locations were statistically significant ( P < 0.05; χ 2) for TABV only. None of the aforementioned factors was significantly associated with RBV seropositivity rates.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus in Bats, Saudi Arabia

          The source of human infection with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus remains unknown. Molecular investigation indicated that bats in Saudi Arabia are infected with several alphacoronaviruses and betacoronaviruses. Virus from 1 bat showed 100% nucleotide identity to virus from the human index case-patient. Bats might play a role in human infection.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Close Relative of Human Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus in Bat, South Africa

            To the Editor: The severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak of 2002–03 and the subsequent implication of bats as reservoir hosts of the causative agent, a coronavirus (CoV), prompted numerous studies of bats and the viruses they harbor. A novel clade 2c betacoronavirus, termed Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)–CoV, was recently identified as the causative agent of a severe respiratory disease that is mainly affecting humans on the Arabian Peninsula ( 1 ). Extending on previous work ( 2 ), we described European Pipistrellus bat–derived CoVs that are closely related to MERS-CoV ( 3 ). We now report the identification of a South Africa bat derived CoV that has an even closer phylogenetic relationship with MERS-CoV. During 2011–2012, fecal pellets were collected from 62 bats representing 13 different species in the KwaZulu-Natal and Western Cape Provinces of South Africa and stored in RNAlater solution (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Details about the bat sample are available in the Technical Appendix. RNA was extracted by using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Screening for CoVs was done by nested reverse transcription PCR using broadly reactive oligonucleotide primers targeting a conserved region in the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) gene (online Technical Appendix). PCR results were positive for 5 (8%) of the 62 specimens. PCR amplicons for 4 positive specimens yielded alphacoronavirus sequences related to recently described bat alphacoronaviruses from South Africa ( 4 ). The other positive specimen, termed PML/2011, was from an adult female Neoromicia cf. zuluensis bat sampled in 2011; the specimen yielded a novel betacoronavirus (GenBank accession no. KC869678). Technical Appendix Figure 1 shows the distribution of this bat species. To obtain better phylogenetic resolution, we extended the 398-nt RdRp fragment generated by the screening PCR to 816 nt, as described ( 5 ). PML/2011 differed from MERS-CoV by only 1 aa exchange (0.3%) in the translated 816-nt RdRp gene fragment. Thus, PML/2011 was much more related to MERS-CoV than any other known virus. The amino acid sequence of the next closest known relatives of MERS-CoV, from European Pipistrellus bats ( 3 ), differed from MERS-CoV by 1.8%. The amino acid sequences of viruses from Nycteris bats in Ghana ( 3 ) and the 2c prototype bat CoVs, HKU4 and HKU5, from China ( 6 ) differed by 5.5%–7.7% from MERS-CoV. The smaller 152- to 396-nt RdRp fragments of 2c bat CoVs from a Hypsugo savii bat in Spain ( 7 ), bat guano in Thailand ( 8 ), and a Nyctinomops bat in Mexico ( 9 ) showed no or only partial overlap with the 816-nt fragment generated in this study; thus, a direct comparison could not be done. However, in their respective RdRp fragments, these CoVs yielded amino acid sequence distances of 3.5%–8.0% and were thus probably more distant from MERS-CoV than the virus described here. A Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of the 816-nt RdRp sequence confirmed the close relationship between PML/2011 and MERS-CoV (Figure). Their phylogenetic relatedness was as close as that of SARS-CoV and the most closely related bat coronavirus known, Rs672 from a Rhinolophus sinicus bat (Figure). Like PML/2011 and MERS-CoV, Rs672 and SARS-CoV showed only 1 aa exchange in the translated 816-nt RdRp fragment. To confirm this relatedness, we amplified and sequenced a short 269-nt sequence encompassing the 3′-terminus of the spike gene for PML/2011 (oligonucleotide primers available upon request from the authors). A partial spike gene–based phylogeny using this sequence yielded the same topology as that using the partial RdRp sequence (Technical Appendix Figure 2). Again, PML/2011 was most closely related to MERS-CoV, showing only a 10.9% aa sequence distance in this gene, which encodes the glycoprotein responsible for CoV attachment and cellular entry. This distance was less than the 13.3% aa sequence distance between MERS-CoV and the European Pipistrellus CoVs ( 3 ) and less than the 20.5%–27.3% aa sequence distance between MERS-CoV and HKU5 and between MERS-CoV and HKU4 ( 6 ) in the same sequence fragment. Figure Partial RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) gene phylogeny, including the novel betacoronavirus from a Neoromicia zuluensis bat in South Africa (GenBank accession no. KC869678 for both partial RdRp and spike gene sequences). The Bayesian phylogeny was done on a translated 816-nt RdRp gene sequence fragment, as described ( 5 ). MrBayes V3.1 (http://mrbayes.sourceforge.net/) was used with a WAG substitution model assumption over 2,000,000 generations sampled every 100 steps, resulting in 20,000 trees, of which 25% were discarded as burn-in. A whale gammacoronavirus was used as an outgroup. The novel N. zuluensis bat virus is highlighted in gray. Values at deep nodes represent statistical support from posterior probabilities. Only values >0.9 are shown. Coronavirus clades are depicted to the right of taxa. Scale bar represents genetic distance. MERS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome; Bt-CoV, bat coronavirus; HCoV, human coronavirus, MHV, mouse hepatitis virus; FCoV, feline coronavirus; TGEV, transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus. Our results further support the hypothesis that, like human CoV-229E and SARS-CoV, ancestors of MERS-CoV might exist in Old World insectivorous bats belonging to the family Vespertilionidae, to which the genera Neoromicia and Pipistrellus belong ( 3 ). Knowledge of the close relatedness of PML/2011 and MERS-CoV, which contrasts with the more distant relatedness of CoVs in bats from the Americas and Asia, enables speculations of an African origin for bat reservoir hosts of MERS-CoV ancestors. This hypothesis is limited by a global sampling bias, the small sample size, and the single clade 2c betacoronavirus detection in this study. Still, a putative transfer of MERS-CoV ancestors from Africa to the Arabian Peninsula would parallel the transfer of other viruses (e.g., the exportation of Rift Valley fever virus from East Africa, which led to a severe outbreak in Saudi Arabia in 2000) ( 10 ). Studies of Vespertilionidae bats and potential intermediate hosts (e.g., carnivores and ungulates, such as camels) are urgently needed to elucidate the emergence of MERS-CoV. Such studies should focus on the Arabian Peninsula and Africa. Technical Appendix Description of bat sampling, screened bat species, distribution of Neoromicia zuluensis bats, and spike gene phylogeny of the 2c betacoronavirus clade.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Bats as a continuing source of emerging infections in humans

              Abstract Amongst the 60 viral species reported to be associated with bats, 59 are RNA viruses, which are potentially important in the generation of emerging and re‐emerging infections in humans. The prime examples of these are the lyssaviruses and Henipavirus. The transmission of Nipah, Hendra and perhaps SARS coronavirus and Ebola virus to humans may involve intermediate amplification hosts such as pigs, horses, civets and primates, respectively. Understanding of the natural reservoir or introductory host, the amplifying host, the epidemic centre and at‐risk human populations are crucial in the control of emerging zoonosis. The association between the bat coronaviruses and certain lyssaviruses with particular bat species implies co‐evolution between specific viruses and bat hosts. Cross‐infection between the huge number of bat species may generate new viruses which are able to jump the trans‐mammalian species barrier more efficiently. The currently known viruses that have been found in bats are reviewed and the risks of transmission to humans are highlighted. Certain families of bats including the Pteropodidae, Molossidae, Phyllostomidae, and Vespertilionidae are most frequently associated with known human pathogens. A systematic survey of bats is warranted to better understand the ecology of these viruses. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Zoonoses Public Health
                Zoonoses Public Health
                10.1111/(ISSN)1863-2378
                ZPH
                Zoonoses and Public Health
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1863-1959
                1863-2378
                17 April 2014
                February 2015
                : 62
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1111/zph.2015.62.issue-1 )
                : 53-60
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] School of Veterinary Medicine The University of the West Indies St. Augustine Trinidad and Tobago
                [ 2 ] Department of Pre‐Clinical Sciences The University of the West Indies St. Augustine Trinidad and Tobago
                [ 3 ] Institute for Human Infections and Immunity and Center for Tropical Diseases University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston TX USA
                [ 4 ] Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Preventive Medicine College of Veterinary Medicine Iowa State University Ames IA USA
                [ 5 ] Department of Life Sciences The University of the West Indies St. Augustine Trinidad and Tobago
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence:

                A. Adesiyun. School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago. Tel.: 868 645 4481, Fax: 868 645 7428, E‐mail: aadesiyun@ 123456sta.uwi.edu .

                Article
                ZPH12118
                10.1111/zph.12118
                7165661
                24751420
                ba8a0350-7659-4146-9020-125cac7a266b
                © 2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 06 October 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: UWI Campus Research and Publications Fund
                Award ID: CRP.1.MAY08.5
                Funded by: Robert E. Shope International Fellowship in Infectious Diseases
                Funded by: James W. McLaughlin Endowment fund
                Funded by: Ministry of Agriculture, Land and Marine Resources
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2015
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.0 mode:remove_FC converted:15.04.2020

                arbovirus,bats,seroepidemiology,alphavirus,flavivirus,antibodies,trinidad

                Comments

                Comment on this article