2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Amiodarone and the risk of cancer : A nationwide population-based study

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In postmarketing surveillance, the US Food and Drug Administration has reported the development of lung masses, thyroid cancer, and skin cancer after amiodarone therapy. Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research database, the authors conducted a population-based cohort study. Patients who were treated with amiodarone between 1997 and 2008 were enrolled. Those with antecedent cancer were excluded. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of cancers were calculated to compare the cancer incidence of the study cohort with that of the general population. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to evaluate the association between cumulative defined daily doses (cDDDs) of amiodarone and cancer occurrence. The study included 6418 subjects, with a median follow-up of 2.57 years. A total of 280 patients developed cancer. The risk of cancer increased with borderline significance (SIR, 1.12; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.99-1.26 [P = .067]). Male patients had a higher risk (SIR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.02-1.36 [P = .022]). The total cohort of patients and the male patients with > 180 cDDDs within the first year were found to have SIRs of 1.28 (95% CI, 1.00-1.61; P = .046) and 1.46 (95% CI, 1.11-1.89; P = .008), respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, and comorbidities, the hazards ratio was 1.98 (95% CI, 1.22-3.22; P = .006) for the high tertile of cDDDs compared with the low tertile. The results of the current study indicate that amiodarone may be associated with an increased risk of incident cancer, especially in males, with a dose-dependent effect. Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Immortal time bias in pharmaco-epidemiology.

          Immortal time is a span of cohort follow-up during which, because of exposure definition, the outcome under study could not occur. Bias from immortal time was first identified in the 1970s in epidemiology in the context of cohort studies of the survival benefit of heart transplantation. It recently resurfaced in pharmaco-epidemiology, with several observational studies reporting that various medications can be extremely effective at reducing morbidity and mortality. These studies, while using different cohort designs, all involved some form of immortal time and the corresponding bias. In this paper, the author describes various cohort study designs leading to this bias, quantifies its magnitude under different survival distributions, and illustrates it by using data from a cohort of lung cancer patients. The author shows that for time-based, event-based, and exposure-based cohort definitions, the bias in the rate ratio resulting from misclassified or excluded immortal time increases proportionately to the duration of immortal time. The bias is more pronounced with a decreasing hazard function for the outcome event, as illustrated with the Weibull distribution compared with a constant hazard from the exponential distribution. In conclusion, observational studies of drug benefit in which computerized databases are used must be designed and analyzed properly to avoid immortal time bias.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Amiodarone for the prevention of sudden cardiac death: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

            Not all patients at risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) are eligible for, or have access to implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. There are conflicting data regarding the efficacy and safety of amiodarone for the prevention of SCD. We conducted a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials examining the use of amiodarone vs. placebo/control for the prevention of SCD. We identified 15 trials, which randomized 8522 patients to amiodarone or placebo/control. Amiodarone decreased the incidence of SCD [7.1 vs. 9.7%; OR 0.71 (0.61-0.84), P < 0.001] and cardiovascular death (CVD) [14.0 vs. 16.3%; OR 0.82 (0.71-0.94), P = 0.004]. There was a 1.5% absolute risk reduction in all-cause mortality which did not meet statistical significance (P = 0.093). Amiodarone therapy increased the risk of pulmonary [2.9 vs. 1.5%; OR 1.97, (1.27-3.04), P = 0.002], and thyroid [3.6 vs. 0.4%; OR 5.68, (2.94-10.98), P < 0.001] toxicity. Amiodarone reduces the risk of SCD by 29% and CVD by 18%, and therefore, represents a viable alternative in patients who are not eligible for or who do not have access to ICD therapy for the prevention of SCD. However, amiodarone therapy is neutral with respect to all-cause mortality and is associated with a two- and five-fold increased risk of pulmonary and thyroid toxicity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Statins and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis B virus infection.

              Statins have potential protective effects against cancers, but no studies have focused on patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the use of statins in HBV-infected patients and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We conducted a population-based cohort study from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. A total of 33,413 HBV-infected patients were included as the study cohort. Each patient was individually tracked from 1997 to 2008 to identify incident cases of HCC since 1999. Subsequent use of statin, other lipid-lowering agents, aspirin, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors was identified. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for the association between the use of statins and the occurrence of HCC in the HBV-infected cohort. There were 1,021 HCCs in the HBV cohort during the follow-up period of 328,946 person-years; the overall incidence rate was 310.4 HCCs per 100,000 person-years. There was a dose-response relationship between statin use and the risk of HCC in the HBV cohort. The adjusted HRs were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.44 to 0.99), 0.41 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.61), and 0.34 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.67) for statin use of 28 to 90, 91 to 365, and more than 365 cumulative defined daily doses (cDDDs), respectively, relative to no statin use (< 28 cDDDs). Statin use may reduce the risk for HCC in HBV-infected patients in a dose-dependent manner. Further mechanistic research is needed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cancer
                Cancer
                Wiley
                0008543X
                May 01 2013
                May 01 2013
                April 08 2013
                : 119
                : 9
                : 1699-1705
                Article
                10.1002/cncr.27881
                23568847
                ba9f8c68-e525-4a51-808d-db91d03d67b0
                © 2013

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article