11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Transcription-mediated replication hindrance: a major driver of genome instability

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this review, Gómez-González et al. discuss the underlying causes of transcription–replication conflicts, which are major threats to genome integrity. They also discuss mechanisms by which cells resolve these conflicts to sustain genome integrity.

          Abstract

          Genome replication involves dealing with obstacles that can result from DNA damage but also from chromatin alterations, topological stress, tightly bound proteins or non-B DNA structures such as R loops. Experimental evidence reveals that an engaged transcription machinery at the DNA can either enhance such obstacles or be an obstacle itself. Thus, transcription can become a potentially hazardous process promoting localized replication fork hindrance and stress, which would ultimately cause genome instability, a hallmark of cancer cells. Understanding the causes behind transcription–replication conflicts as well as how the cell resolves them to sustain genome integrity is the aim of this review.

          Related collections

          Most cited references249

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives.

          Damage to our genetic material is an ongoing threat to both our ability to faithfully transmit genetic information to our offspring as well as our own survival. To respond to these threats, eukaryotes have evolved the DNA damage response (DDR). The DDR is a complex signal transduction pathway that has the ability to sense DNA damage and transduce this information to the cell to influence cellular responses to DNA damage. Cells possess an arsenal of enzymatic tools capable of remodeling and repairing DNA; however, their activities must be tightly regulated in a temporal, spatial, and DNA lesion-appropriate fashion to optimize repair and prevent unnecessary and potentially deleterious alterations in the structure of DNA during normal cellular processes. This review will focus on how the DDR controls DNA repair and the phenotypic consequences of defects in these critical regulatory functions in mammals. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cancer etiology. Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions.

            Some tissue types give rise to human cancers millions of times more often than other tissue types. Although this has been recognized for more than a century, it has never been explained. Here, we show that the lifetime risk of cancers of many different types is strongly correlated (0.81) with the total number of divisions of the normal self-renewing cells maintaining that tissue's homeostasis. These results suggest that only a third of the variation in cancer risk among tissues is attributable to environmental factors or inherited predispositions. The majority is due to "bad luck," that is, random mutations arising during DNA replication in normal, noncancerous stem cells. This is important not only for understanding the disease but also for designing strategies to limit the mortality it causes. Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions.

              DNA damage checkpoint genes, such as p53, are frequently mutated in human cancer, but the selective pressure for their inactivation remains elusive. We analysed a panel of human lung hyperplasias, all of which retained wild-type p53 genes and had no signs of gross chromosomal instability, and found signs of a DNA damage response, including histone H2AX and Chk2 phosphorylation, p53 accumulation, focal staining of p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) and apoptosis. Progression to carcinoma was associated with p53 or 53BP1 inactivation and decreased apoptosis. A DNA damage response was also observed in dysplastic nevi and in human skin xenografts, in which hyperplasia was induced by overexpression of growth factors. Both lung and experimentally-induced skin hyperplasias showed allelic imbalance at loci that are prone to DNA double-strand break formation when DNA replication is compromised (common fragile sites). We propose that, from its earliest stages, cancer development is associated with DNA replication stress, which leads to DNA double-strand breaks, genomic instability and selective pressure for p53 mutations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Genes Dev
                Genes Dev
                genesdev
                genesdev
                GAD
                Genes & Development
                Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
                0890-9369
                1549-5477
                1 August 2019
                1 August 2019
                : 33
                : 15-16
                : 1008-1026
                Affiliations
                Centro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa (CABIMER), Universidad de Sevilla-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Universidad Pablo de Olavide., 41092 Seville, Spain
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: aguilo@ 123456us.es
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1655-8407
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4782-1714
                Article
                8711660
                10.1101/gad.324517.119
                6672053
                31123061
                bae39167-b619-4b6c-8626-680b95e2baf4
                © 2019 Gómez-González and Aguilera; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

                This article, published in Genes & Development, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 19
                Funding
                Funded by: European Research Council , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100010663;
                Funded by: Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
                Funded by: Junta de Andalucía , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100011011;
                Funded by: Scientific Foundation of the Spanish Association Against Cancer (AECC)
                Categories
                3 & 1
                Special Section: Review

                dna–rna hybrids,chromosome fragility,genetic instability,replication fork stalling,transcription

                Comments

                Comment on this article