4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      On the challenges associated with the study of police use of deadly force in the United States: A response to Schwartz & Jahn

      research-article
      *
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In response to Gabriel Schwartz and Jaquelyn Jahn’s descriptive study, “Mapping fatal police violence across U.S. metropolitan areas: Overall rates and racial/ethnic inequalities, 2013–2017,” I provide three reflections. First, the framing of this issue is vitally important. Second, police-involved fatalities represent a nonrandom sample of all incidents involving police use of deadly force (i.e., physical force that causes or is likely to cause death), and unfortunately, we lack comprehensive data on use of deadly force that does not result in fatalities. Finally, to make sense of who is killed by the police, researchers must also identify who was exposed to the risk of being killed by the police.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Framing Theory

          We review the meaning of the concept of framing, approaches to studying framing, and the effects of framing on public opinion. After defining framing and framing effects, we articulate a method for identifying frames in communication and a psychological model for understanding how such frames affect public opinion. We also discuss the relationship between framing and priming, outline future research directions, and describe the normative implications of framing.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality.

            Hospitals have difficulty justifying the expense of maintaining trauma centers without strong evidence of their effectiveness. To address this gap, we examined differences in mortality between level 1 trauma centers and hospitals without a trauma center (non-trauma centers). Mortality outcomes were compared among patients treated in 18 hospitals with a level 1 trauma center and 51 hospitals non-trauma centers located in 14 states. Patients 18 to 84 years old with a moderate-to-severe injury were eligible. Complete data were obtained for 1104 patients who died in the hospital and 4087 patients who were discharged alive. We used propensity-score weighting to adjust for observable differences between patients treated at trauma centers and those treated at non-trauma centers. After adjustment for differences in the case mix, the in-hospital mortality rate was significantly lower at trauma centers than at non-trauma centers (7.6 percent vs. 9.5 percent; relative risk, 0.80; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.66 to 0.98), as was the one-year mortality rate (10.4 percent vs. 13.8 percent; relative risk, 0.75; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.95). The effects of treatment at a trauma center varied according to the severity of injury, with evidence to suggest that differences in mortality rates were primarily confined to patients with more severe injuries. Our findings show that the risk of death is significantly lower when care is provided in a trauma center than in a non-trauma center and argue for continued efforts at regionalization. Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Racial Health Disparities and Covid-19 — Caution and Context

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                28 July 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 7
                : e0236158
                Affiliations
                [001]School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
                London School of Economics, UNITED KINGDOM
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3812-8590
                Article
                PONE-D-20-07969
                10.1371/journal.pone.0236158
                7386827
                32722714
                baf0d82f-3a43-48fb-ac8f-553dee24e5d9
                © 2020 Justin Nix

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 19 March 2020
                : 24 June 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Pages: 11
                Funding
                The author received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Formal Comment
                Social Sciences
                Law and Legal Sciences
                Criminal Justice System
                Law Enforcement
                Police
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Police
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Medical Risk Factors
                Traumatic Injury Risk Factors
                Violent Crime
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Traumatic Injury Risk Factors
                Violent Crime
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Criminology
                Crime
                Violent Crime
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Medical Risk Factors
                Engineering and Technology
                Equipment
                Weapons
                Firearms
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Criminology
                Crime
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Population Biology
                Population Metrics
                Death Rates
                Earth Sciences
                Geography
                Human Geography
                Urban Geography
                Urban Areas
                Social Sciences
                Human Geography
                Urban Geography
                Urban Areas
                Earth Sciences
                Geography
                Geographic Areas
                Urban Areas

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article