27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recent Advances in Bioink Design for 3D Bioprinting of Tissues and Organs

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is a growing demand for alternative fabrication approaches to develop tissues and organs as conventional techniques are not capable of fabricating constructs with required structural, mechanical, and biological complexity. 3D bioprinting offers great potential to fabricate highly complex constructs with precise control of structure, mechanics, and biological matter [i.e., cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) components]. 3D bioprinting is an additive manufacturing approach that utilizes a “bioink” to fabricate devices and scaffolds in a layer-by-layer manner. 3D bioprinting allows printing of a cell suspension into a tissue construct with or without a scaffold support. The most common bioinks are cell-laden hydrogels, decellulerized ECM-based solutions, and cell suspensions. In this mini review, a brief description and comparison of the bioprinting methods, including extrusion-based, droplet-based, and laser-based bioprinting, with particular focus on bioink design requirements are presented. We also present the current state of the art in bioink design including the challenges and future directions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues.

          Bioprinting is a 3D fabrication technology used to precisely dispense cell-laden biomaterials for the construction of complex 3D functional living tissues or artificial organs. While still in its early stages, bioprinting strategies have demonstrated their potential use in regenerative medicine to generate a variety of transplantable tissues, including skin, cartilage, and bone. However, current bioprinting approaches still have technical challenges in terms of high-resolution cell deposition, controlled cell distributions, vascularization, and innervation within complex 3D tissues. While no one-size-fits-all approach to bioprinting has emerged, it remains an on-demand, versatile fabrication technique that may address the growing organ shortage as well as provide a high-throughput method for cell patterning at the micrometer scale for broad biomedical engineering applications. In this review, we introduce the basic principles, materials, integration strategies and applications of bioprinting. We also discuss the recent developments, current challenges and future prospects of 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Combined with recent advances in human pluripotent stem cell technologies, 3D-bioprinted tissue models could serve as an enabling platform for high-throughput predictive drug screening and more effective regenerative therapies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Tissue engineering--current challenges and expanding opportunities.

            Tissue engineering can be used to restore, maintain, or enhance tissues and organs. The potential impact of this field, however, is far broader-in the future, engineered tissues could reduce the need for organ replacement, and could greatly accelerate the development of new drugs that may cure patients, eliminating the need for organ transplants altogether.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels

              Although cell-matrix adhesive interactions are known to regulate stem cell differentiation, the underlying mechanisms, in particular for direct three-dimensional (3D) encapsulation within hydrogels, are poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that in covalently crosslinked hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogels, the differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) is directed by the generation of degradation-mediated cellular-traction, independent of cell morphology or matrix mechanics. hMSCs within HA hydrogels of equivalent elastic moduli that either permit (restrict) cell-mediated degradation exhibited high (low) degrees of cell spreading and high (low) tractions, and favoured osteogenesis (adipogenesis). In addition, switching the permissive hydrogel to a restrictive state via delayed secondary crosslinking reduced further hydrogel degradation, suppressed traction, and caused a switch from osteogenesis to adipogenesis in the absence of changes to the extended cellular morphology. Also, inhibiting tension-mediated signalling in the permissive environment mirrored the effects of delayed secondary crosslinking, whereas upregulating tension induced osteogenesis even in the restrictive environment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Bioeng Biotechnol
                Front Bioeng Biotechnol
                Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
                Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-4185
                05 April 2017
                2017
                : 5
                : 23
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Instructive Biomaterials and Additive Manufacturing (IBAM) Laboratory, Otto H. York Department of Chemical Biological and Pharmaceutical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology , Newark, NJ, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Giovanni Vozzi, University of Pisa, Italy

                Reviewed by: Piergiorgio Gentile, University of Sheffield, UK; Arti Ahluwalia, University of Pisa, Italy

                *Correspondence: Murat Guvendiren, muratg@ 123456njit.edu

                Specialty section: This article was submitted to Bionics and Biomimetics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

                Article
                10.3389/fbioe.2017.00023
                5380738
                28424770
                baf66566-3d02-488b-b80e-0cc9cdc1792c
                Copyright © 2017 Ji and Guvendiren.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 25 January 2017
                : 21 March 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 92, Pages: 8, Words: 6581
                Funding
                Funded by: National Science Foundation 10.13039/100000001
                Award ID: DMR-1714882
                Categories
                Bioengineering and Biotechnology
                Mini Review

                additive manufacturing,biofabrication,tissue engineering,regenerative medicine,hydrogel,cell printing,extracellular matrix

                Comments

                Comment on this article