6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Non-uniform tropical forest responses to the ‘Columbian Exchange’ in the Neotropics and Asia-Pacific

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          It has been suggested that Iberian arrival in the Americas in 1492 and subsequent dramatic depopulation led to forest regrowth that had global impacts on atmospheric CO 2 concentrations and surface temperatures. Despite tropical forests representing the most important terrestrial carbon stock globally, systematic examination of historical afforestation in these habitats in the Neotropics is lacking. Additionally, there has been no assessment of similar depopulation–afforestation dynamics in other parts of the global tropics that were incorporated into the Spanish Empire. Here, we compile and semi-quantitatively analyse pollen records from the regions claimed by the Spanish in the Atlantic and Pacific to provide pan-tropical insights into European colonial impacts on forest dynamics. Our results suggest that periods of afforestation over the past millennium varied across space and time and depended on social, economic and biogeographic contexts. We argue that this reveals the unequal and divergent origins of the Anthropocene as a socio-political and biophysical process, highlighting the need for higher-resolution, targeted analyses to fully elucidate pre-colonial and colonial era human–tropical landscape interactions.

          Abstract

          The authors assess the impact of Spanish colonization on forest dynamics across the tropics, finding variable responses according to regional land use strategies, as well as other cultural, social and biophysical factors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references111

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests.

              The terrestrial carbon sink has been large in recent decades, but its size and location remain uncertain. Using forest inventory data and long-term ecosystem carbon studies, we estimate a total forest sink of 2.4 ± 0.4 petagrams of carbon per year (Pg C year(-1)) globally for 1990 to 2007. We also estimate a source of 1.3 ± 0.7 Pg C year(-1) from tropical land-use change, consisting of a gross tropical deforestation emission of 2.9 ± 0.5 Pg C year(-1) partially compensated by a carbon sink in tropical forest regrowth of 1.6 ± 0.5 Pg C year(-1). Together, the fluxes comprise a net global forest sink of 1.1 ± 0.8 Pg C year(-1), with tropical estimates having the largest uncertainties. Our total forest sink estimate is equivalent in magnitude to the terrestrial sink deduced from fossil fuel emissions and land-use change sources minus ocean and atmospheric sinks.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                hamilton@shh.mpg.de
                roberts@shh.mpg.de
                Journal
                Nat Ecol Evol
                Nat Ecol Evol
                Nature Ecology & Evolution
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2397-334X
                10 June 2021
                10 June 2021
                2021
                : 5
                : 8
                : 1174-1184
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.469873.7, ISNI 0000 0004 4914 1197, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, ; Jena, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.1001.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2180 7477, School of Culture, History and Language, College of Asia and the Pacific, , Australian National University, ; Canberra, Australian Capital Territory Australia
                [3 ]GRID grid.1001.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2180 7477, Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, , Australian National University, ; Canberra, Australian Capital Territory Australia
                [4 ]GRID grid.1003.2, ISNI 0000 0000 9320 7537, School of Social Science, , University of Queensland, ; Brisbane, Queensland Australia
                [5 ]GRID grid.22072.35, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7697, Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, , University of Calgary, ; Calgary, Alberta Canada
                [6 ]GRID grid.453560.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2192 7591, Department of Anthropology, , National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, ; Washington DC, USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.8391.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8024, Department of Archaeology, College of Humanities, , University of Exeter, ; Exeter, UK
                [8 ]GRID grid.194645.b, ISNI 0000000121742757, Department of Earth Sciences, , The University of Hong Kong, ; Hong Kong, China
                [9 ]GRID grid.443239.b, ISNI 0000 0000 9950 521X, Archaeological Studies Programme, , University of the Philippines, ; Quezon City, the Philippines
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5443-8353
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1354-4870
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7871-2230
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7783-4199
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8155-5360
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9919-7613
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9640-7275
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4403-7548
                Article
                1474
                10.1038/s41559-021-01474-4
                8324576
                34112995
                bafb80f7-0513-4a49-b0b8-63dc848125ab
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 26 November 2020
                : 21 April 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100010661, EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020);
                Award ID: 850709
                Award ID: 850709
                Award ID: 850709
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021

                palaeoecology,environmental impact,archaeology
                palaeoecology, environmental impact, archaeology

                Comments

                Comment on this article