2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      K-wire Fixation of Closed Hand Fractures Outside the Main Operating Room Does Not Increase Infections

      research-article
      , MD * , , , BN , , MD , , MD § , , MD
      (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab)
      Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
      Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Background:

          Closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) of closed hand fractures in the main operating room (OR) is much more expensive than outside of the OR. However, there is a reluctance to fix fractures out of the OR due to the perceived increase in infections. Our goal was to prospectively analyze the infection rates of performing CRIF of closed metacarpal and phalangeal fractures in these two settings.

          Methods:

          A multicenter prospective analysis of patients undergoing CRIF of metacarpal or phalangeal fractures inside or outside the OR was performed. Demographic data, injury characteristics, surgery information and postoperative infectious complications were recorded, including cellulitis, frank pus, and osteomyelitis.

          Results:

          The study involved 1042 patients with a total of 2265 Kirschner-wires (K-wires). Infection rates were not statistically higher in the 719 patients who had CRIF outside of the OR (cellulitis 2.5%, frank pus 1.4%) compared with the 323 patients with CRIF in the OR group (cellulitis 3.4%, frank pus 2.5%). The OR group had a longer time to operation and a longer procedure time, but a shorter time with the K-wires in place.

          Conclusion:

          K-wire fixation of closed hand fractures outside of the OR under field sterility is safe because it does not increase infectious complications compared to CRIF in the main OR under full sterility.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States.

          The purpose of this study was to estimate the frequency and describe the epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. We extracted cases with ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes of 813.0 to 817.1 from the 1998 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. In 1998 there were 1,465,874 estimated cases of hand/forearm fractures, accounting for 1.5% of all emergency department cases. Radius and/or ulna fractures comprised the largest proportion of fractures (44%). The most affected age group was 5 to 14 years of age (26%). Private insurance paid for 49% of the cases. Most of the fractures occurred at home (30%); the street/highway was the second most likely fracture location (14%). Accidental falls caused the majority (47%) of fractures. Large database analysis provides important information that can be used to target interventions toward vulnerable populations and to allocate adequate resources for treating upper extremity fractures.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pin tract infection with contemporary external fixation: how much of a problem?

            To determine the incidence of pin tract infection.DESIGN Retrospective chart review. Level 1 trauma center in an urban community. A total of 285 patients with 285 fractures over a 4-year period (1997-2001). External fixation. Incidence of pin tract infection. Of 285 fractures, 32 (11.2%) were complicated by infection. The incidence of infection according to montage was 3.9% (3/77) for ring fixators, which was significantly different (P < 0.04) from the 12.9% incidence (23/178) for unilateral fixators and the 20.0% incidence (6/30) for hybrid fixators (P = 0.004). The incidences of pin tract infection for the unilateral fixator group and the hybrid fixator group were not significantly different. Patients with hybrid external fixators had a similar risk of pin tract infection as patients who had unilateral fixators. The infection rate in the ring fixator group was significantly lower than the hybrid external and unilateral fixator groups.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Is main operating room sterility really necessary in carpal tunnel surgery? A multicenter prospective study of minor procedure room field sterility surgery.

              Over 70% of Canadian carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) operations are performed outside of the main operating room (OR) with field sterility and surgeon-administered pure local anesthesia [LeBlanc et al., Hand 2(4):173-8, 14]. Is main OR sterility necessary to avoid infection for this operation? This study evaluates the infection rate in carpal tunnel release (CTR) using minor procedure room field sterility.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                GOX
                Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                2169-7574
                21 November 2022
                November 2022
                : 10
                : 11
                : e4679
                Affiliations
                From the [* ]Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada
                []Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
                []Division of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Luke’s Medical Centre, Quezon City, Philippines
                [§ ]Division of Plastic Surgery, Montreal, Canada.
                Author notes
                Joshua A. Gillis, MD, Associate Professor, Division of Plastic Surgery, Eastern Health, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John’s, NL, A1B3V6, E-mail: jgillis@ 123456dal.ca
                Article
                00046
                10.1097/GOX.0000000000004679
                9682614
                36438460
                bb0144d7-6c61-4c04-80d6-7e72183ad675
                Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 21 June 2022
                : 29 September 2022
                Categories
                Hand
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                CANADA
                T

                Comments

                Comment on this article