59
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dissecting functional components of reproductive isolation among closely related sympatric species of the Anopheles gambiae complex

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Explaining how and why reproductive isolation evolves and determining which forms of reproductive isolation have the largest impact on the process of population divergence are major goals in the study of speciation. By studying recent adaptive radiations in incompletely isolated taxa, it is possible to identify barriers involved at early divergence before other confounding barriers emerge after speciation is complete. Sibling species of the Anopheles gambiae complex offer opportunities to provide insights into speciation mechanisms. Here, we studied patterns of reproductive isolation among three taxa, Anopheles coluzzii, An. gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis, to compare its strength at different spatial scales, to dissect the relative contribution of pre‐ versus postmating isolation, and to infer the involvement of ecological divergence on hybridization. Because F1 hybrids are viable, fertile and not uncommon, understanding the dynamics of hybridization in this trio of major malaria vectors has important implications for how adaptations arise and spread across the group, and in planning studies of the safety and efficacy of gene drive as a means of malaria control. We first performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of published surveys reporting on hybrid prevalence, showing strong reproductive isolation at a continental scale despite geographically restricted exceptions. Second, we exploited our own extensive field data sets collected at a regional scale in two contrasting environmental settings, to assess: (i) levels of premating isolation; (ii) spatio/temporal and frequency‐dependent dynamics of hybridization, (iii) relationship between reproductive isolation and ecological divergence and (iv) hybrid viability penalty. Results are in accordance with ecological speciation theory predicting a positive association between the strength of reproductive isolation and degree of ecological divergence, and indicate that postmating isolation does contribute to reproductive isolation among these species. Specifically, only postmating isolation was positively associated with ecological divergence, whereas premating isolation was correlated with phylogenetic distance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references87

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Identification of single specimens of the Anopheles gambiae complex by the polymerase chain reaction.

          A ribosomal DNA-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method has been developed for species identification of individuals of the five most widespread members of the Anopheles gambiae complex, a group of morphologically indistinguishable sibling mosquito species that includes the major vectors of malaria in Africa. The method, which is based on species-specific nucleotide sequences in the ribosomal DNA intergenic spacers, may be used to identify both species and interspecies hybrids, regardless of life stage, using either extracted DNA or fragments of a specimen. Intact portions of a mosquito as small as an egg or the segment of one leg may be placed directly into the PCR mixture for amplification and analysis. The method uses a cocktail of five 20-base oligonucleotides to identify An. gambiae, An. arabiensis, An. quadriannnulatus, and either An. melas in western Africa or An. melas in eastern and southern Africa.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material.

            Procedures utilizing Chelex 100 chelating resin have been developed for extracting DNA from forensic-type samples for use with the PCR. The procedures are simple, rapid, involve no organic solvents and do not require multiple tube transfers for most types of samples. The extraction of DNA from semen and very small bloodstains using Chelex 100 is as efficient or more efficient than using proteinase K and phenol-chloroform extraction. DNA extracted from bloodstains seems less prone to contain PCR inhibitors when prepared by this method. The Chelex method has been used with amplification and typing at the HLA DQ alpha locus to obtain the DQ alpha genotypes of many different types of samples, including whole blood, bloodstains, seminal stains, buccal swabs, hair and post-coital samples. The results of a concordance study are presented in which the DQ alpha genotypes of 84 samples prepared using Chelex or using conventional phenol-chloroform extraction are compared. The genotypes obtained using the two different extraction methods were identical for all samples tested.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Increased proportions of outdoor feeding among residual malaria vector populations following increased use of insecticide-treated nets in rural Tanzania

              Background Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) represent the front-line tools for malaria vector control globally, but are optimally effective where the majority of baseline transmission occurs indoors. In the surveyed area of rural southern Tanzania, bed net use steadily increased over the last decade, reducing malaria transmission intensity by 94%. Methods Starting before bed nets were introduced (1997), and then after two milestones of net use had been reached-75% community-wide use of untreated nets (2004) and then 47% use of ITNs (2009)-hourly biting rates of malaria vectors from the Anopheles gambiae complex and Anopheles funestus group were surveyed. Results In 1997, An. gambiae s.l. and An. funestus mosquitoes exhibited a tendency to bite humans inside houses late at night. For An. gambiae s.l., by 2009, nocturnal activity was less (p = 0.0018). At this time, the sibling species composition of the complex had shifted from predominantly An. gambiae s.s. to predominantly An. arabiensis. For An. funestus, by 2009, nocturnal activity was less (p = 0.0054) as well as the proportion biting indoors (p < 0.0001). At this time, An. funestus s.s. remained the predominant species within this group. As a consequence of these altered feeding patterns, the proportion (mean ± standard error) of human contact with mosquitoes (bites per person per night) occurring indoors dropped from 0.99 ± 0.002 in 1997 to 0.82 ± 0.008 in 2009 for the An. gambiae complex (p = 0.0143) and from 1.00 ± <0.001 to only 0.50 ± 0.048 for the An. funestus complex (p = 0.0004) over the same time period. Conclusions High usage of ITNs can dramatically alter African vector populations so that intense, predominantly indoor transmission is replaced by greatly lowered residual transmission, a greater proportion of which occurs outdoors. Regardless of the underlying mechanism, the residual, self-sustaining transmission will respond poorly to further insecticidal measures within houses. Additional vector control tools which target outdoor biting mosquitoes at the adult or immature stages are required to complement ITNs and IRS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                marco.pombi@uniroma1.it
                carlo.costantini@ird.fr
                Journal
                Evol Appl
                Evol Appl
                10.1111/(ISSN)1752-4571
                EVA
                Evolutionary Applications
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1752-4571
                05 October 2017
                December 2017
                : 10
                : 10 ( doiID: 10.1111/eva.2017.10.issue-10 )
                : 1102-1120
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica e Malattie Infettive Università di Roma “Sapienza” Rome Italy
                [ 2 ] Istituto Pasteur Italia‐Fondazione Cenci‐Bolognetti Rome Italy
                [ 3 ] Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) UMR MIVEGEC (University of Montpellier, CNRS 5290 IRD 224) Centre IRD de Montpellier Montpellier France
                [ 4 ] Organisation de Coordination pour la lutte contre les Endemies en Afrique Centrale (OCEAC) Yaoundé Cameroon
                [ 5 ] CIRAD UMR INTERTRYP Montpellier France
                [ 6 ] Centre International de Recherches Médicales de Franceville Franceville Gabon
                [ 7 ] Department of Entomology University of California Riverside CA USA
                [ 8 ] Centre National de Recherche et Formation sur le Paludisme (CNRFP) Ouagadougou Burkina Faso
                [ 9 ] Institut Pasteur du Cambodge Phnom Penh Cambodia
                [ 10 ] Eck Institute for Global Health & Department of Biological Sciences University of Notre Dame Notre Dame IN USA
                [ 11 ] Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS) Bobo‐Dioulasso Burkina Faso
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Marco Pombi, Università di Roma “Sapienza”Rome, Italy.

                Email: marco.pombi@ 123456uniroma1.it

                and

                Carlo Costantini Institut de Recherche pour le Développement Centre IRD de Montpellier Montpellier Cedex 5 France.

                Email: carlo.costantini@ 123456ird.fr

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4382-9922
                Article
                EVA12517
                10.1111/eva.12517
                5680640
                29151864
                bb157c8f-2b30-4f3a-b40e-079a9f59aedd
                © 2017 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 06 March 2017
                : 10 July 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 7, Pages: 19, Words: 16883
                Funding
                Funded by: Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
                Funded by: Istituto Pasteur—Cenci Bolognetti
                Funded by: World Health Organization special programme on Tropical Diseases Research
                Funded by: French Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
                Funded by: Ministry of Health of Burkina Faso
                Funded by: NIH
                Award ID: R01‐AI063508
                Award ID: R01‐AI76584
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                eva12517
                December 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.2.4.1 mode:remove_FC converted:10.11.2017

                Evolutionary Biology
                ecological speciation,hybridization,postmating,premating,reproductive isolation,species complex

                Comments

                Comment on this article