9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Patient Preferences for Test Result Notification

      research-article
      , B.S. , , M.D. M.S., , M.S., , M.S., , M.D. M.B.A.
      Journal of General Internal Medicine
      Springer US
      test results notification, patient preferences

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Patients are increasingly being given access to their test results, but little is known about how preferences vary with the test under consideration or the results of the test (normal or abnormal).

          Objective

          This study was conducted to examine preferences for test result communication.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          We surveyed adults to explore their preferences for test result notification for three common diagnostic tests of varying “emotional impact” (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA], genital herpes, and cancer biopsy) when test results were 1) normal and 2) abnormal. We conducted our survey between June and August 2012 on the campus of an academic medical center. For each scenario, subjects were asked to rank seven methods that might be used to communicate test results (letter, unsecured email, secured email, text message, telephone call, secure Web portal, office visit) in order of acceptability.

          Main Outcome Measures

          The main measures were the percentage of respondents who ranked a particular test result notification method favorably and the percentage who ranked it as unacceptable.

          Results

          When test results were normal, subjects’ notification preferences were generally similar for DXA, herpes and cancer biopsy, with telephone and letter ranked most favorably for all three tests. Conversely, text message and unsecured email were viewed as unacceptable notification methods for normal results by 45.0–55.0 % of subjects across all three tests. When test results were abnormal, office visits became more popular. A higher proportion of subjects ranked office visits as their most preferred notification method for our test with high “emotional impact” (cancer biopsy) (38.4 %) as compared to DXA (28.2 %) and herpes (27.9 %) ( P = 0.02). For most test scenarios, younger subjects appeared to rank electronic communication modalities (secure email or Web portal) higher than older subjects, though this difference did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.29).

          Conclusions

          Preferences for test result notification can differ substantially depending upon the test under consideration and results of the test. Providers and health care systems should consider these factors when deciding how to communicate results to patients.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3344-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          319-331-3455 , samuel-shultz@uiowa.edu
          Journal
          J Gen Intern Med
          J Gen Intern Med
          Journal of General Internal Medicine
          Springer US (New York )
          0884-8734
          1525-1497
          6 May 2015
          November 2015
          : 30
          : 11
          : 1651-1656
          Affiliations
          [ ]Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, 520 Clark St., Iowa City, IA 52240 USA
          [ ]Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
          [ ]Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Mt. Sinai/UHN Hospitals, Toronto, ON Canada
          [ ]CADRE, Iowa City VA Medical Center, Iowa City, IA USA
          Article
          PMC4617924 PMC4617924 4617924 3344
          10.1007/s11606-015-3344-0
          4617924
          25944020
          bb208a09-7665-4aa6-9e31-bf34b212d26e
          © Society of General Internal Medicine 2015
          History
          Categories
          Original Research
          Custom metadata
          © Society of General Internal Medicine 2015

          test results notification,patient preferences
          test results notification, patient preferences

          Comments

          Comment on this article