8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Review of the Rare GenusPhrynomedusaMiranda-Ribeiro, 1923 (Anura: Phyllomedusidae) With Description of a New Species

      , , ,
      Herpetological Monographs
      Herpetologists League

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evolutionary and ecological causes of the latitudinal diversity gradient in hylid frogs: treefrog trees unearth the roots of high tropical diversity.

          Why are there more species in the tropics than in temperate regions? In recent years, this long-standing question has been addressed primarily by seeking environmental correlates of diversity. But to understand the ultimate causes of diversity patterns, we must also examine the evolutionary and biogeographic processes that directly change species numbers (i.e., speciation, extinction, and dispersal). With this perspective, we dissect the latitudinal diversity gradient in hylid frogs. We reconstruct a phylogeny for 124 hylid species, estimate divergence times and diversification rates for major clades, reconstruct biogeographic changes, and use ecological niche modeling to identify climatic variables that potentially limit dispersal. We find that hylids originated in tropical South America and spread to temperate regions only recently (leaving limited time for speciation). There is a strong relationship between the species richness of each region and when that region was colonized but not between the latitudinal positions of clades and their rates of diversification. Temperature seasonality seemingly limits dispersal of many tropical clades into temperate regions and shows significant phylogenetic conservatism. Overall, our study illustrates how two general principles (niche conservatism and the time-for-speciation effect) may help explain the latitudinal diversity gradient as well as many other diversity patterns across taxa and regions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Variation and distribution in the tree‐frog genusPhyllomedusain Costa Rica, central America

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Asynchronous colonization of Madagascar by the four endemic clades of primates, tenrecs, carnivores, and rodents as inferred from nuclear genes.

              Madagascar harbors four large adaptive radiations of endemic terrestrial mammals: lemurs, tenrecs, carnivorans, and rodents. These rank among the most spectacular examples of evolutionary diversification, but their monophyly and origins are debated. The lack of Tertiary fossils from Madagascar leaves molecular studies as most promising to solve these controversies. We provide a simultaneous reconstruction of phylogeny and age of the four radiations based on a 3.5-kb data set from three nuclear genes (ADRA2B, vWF, and AR). The analysis supports each as a monophyletic clade, sister to African taxa, and thereby identifies four events of colonization out of Africa. To infer the time windows for colonization, we take into account both the divergence from the closest non-insular sister group and the initial intra-insular radiation, which is a novel but conservative approach in studies of the colonization history of Madagascar. We estimate that lemurs colonized Madagascar between 60 million years ago (Mya) (split from lorises) and 50 Mya (lemur radiation) (70-41 Mya taking 95% credibility intervals into account), tenrecs between 42 and 25 Mya (50-20 Mya), carnivorans between 26 and 19 Mya (33-14 Mya), and rodents between 24 and 20 Mya (30-15 Mya). These datings suggest at least two asynchronous colonization events: by lemurs in the Late Cretaceous-Middle Eocene, and by carnivorans and rodents in the Early Oligocene-Early Miocene. The colonization by tenrecs may have taken place simultaneously with either of these two events, or in a third event in the Late Eocene-Oligocene. Colonization by at least lemurs, rodents, and carnivorans appears to have occurred by overseas rafting rather than via a land bridge hypothesized to have existed between 45 and 26 Mya, but the second scenario cannot be ruled out if credibility intervals are taken into account.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Herpetological Monographs
                Herpetological Monographs
                Herpetologists League
                0733-1347
                1938-5137
                November 16 2016
                June 20 2016
                November 16 2016
                June 20 2016
                : 30
                : 1
                : 49-78
                Article
                10.1655/HERPMONOGRAPHS-D-15-00009.1
                bb5e3e11-c1e9-4112-8081-fbdd63b8861e
                © 2016

                http://www.bioone.org/page/resources/researchers/rights_and_permissions

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article