45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Pre-existing virus-specific CD8 + T-cells provide protection against pneumovirus-induced disease in mice

      research-article
      a , a , a , b , c , d , e , f , a , * , a , *
      Vaccine
      Elsevier Science
      BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage, BALF, BAL fluid, DC, dendritic cell, BM-DC, bone marrow derived DC, DCp, peptide-loaded DC, FI, formalin inactivated, hRSV, human respiratory syncytial virus, ID, infectious dose, EID, egg ID, i.n., intranasal, i.p., intraperitoneal, i.v., intravenous, MLN, mediastinal lymph node, NK, natural killer, NS, nonstructural, p.i., post infection, pfu, plaque forming units, PVM, pneunomia virus of mice, SEM, standard error of mean, Pneumoviruses, Pneunomia virus of mice, NK cell, CD8+ T-cell, Vaccine

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          ► NK cells and CD8 + T-cells expand relatively late following pneumovirus infection. ► Memory CD8 + T-cells support type 1 skewing of pneumovirus-specific responses. ► Memory CD8 + T-cells prevent pneumovirus-induced immunopathology. ► CD8 + T-cell targeted immunization protects against pneumovirus-induced disease.

          Abstract

          Pneumoviruses such as pneumonia virus of mice (PVM), bovine respiratory syncytial virus (bRSV) or human (h)RSV are closely related pneumoviruses that cause severe respiratory disease in their respective hosts. It is well-known that T-cell responses are essential in pneumovirus clearance, but pneumovirus-specific T-cell responses also are important mediators of severe immunopathology. In this study we determined whether memory- or pre-existing, transferred virus-specific CD8 + T-cells provide protection against PVM-induced disease. We show that during infection with a sublethal dose of PVM, both natural killer (NK) cells and CD8 + T-cells expand relatively late. Induction of CD8 + T-cell memory against a single CD8 + T-cell epitope, by dendritic cell (DC)-peptide immunization, leads to partial protection against PVM challenge and prevents Th2 differentiation of PVM-induced CD4 T-cells. In addition, adoptively transferred PVM-specific CD8 + T-cells, covering the entire PVM-specific CD8 + T-cell repertoire, provide partial protection from PVM-induced disease. From these data we infer that antigen-specific memory CD8 + T-cells offer significant protection to PVM-induced disease. Thus, CD8 + T-cells, despite being a major cause of PVM-associated pathology during primary infection, may offer promising targets of a protective pneumovirus vaccine.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          An epidemiologic study of altered clinical reactivity to respiratory syncytial (RS) virus infection in children previously vaccinated with an inactivated RS virus vaccine.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Role of T lymphocyte subsets in the pathogenesis of primary infection and rechallenge with respiratory syncytial virus in mice.

            The role of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes in terminating respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) replication, causing disease, and protecting from reinfection was investigated using a BALB/c mouse model in which CD4+ or CD8+ lymphocytes or both were depleted by injections of Mab directed against the respective mouse lymphocyte determinants. Kinetics of RSV replication, illness, and pathology were assessed after primary infection and rechallenge. Both CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte subsets were involved in terminating RSV replication after primary infection. When both T lymphocyte subsets were depleted RSV replication was markedly prolonged, yet no illness was evident, suggesting that host immune response rather than viral cytocidal effect was the primary determinant of disease in mice. Both CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes contributed to illness, although CD8+ lymphocytes appeared to play the dominant role in this particular system. Analysis of histological responses suggested that CD4+ lymphocytes were required for the appearance of peribronchovascular lymphocytic aggregates seen in normal mice after rechallenge, and that the presence of alveolar lymphocytes was correlated with illness. It is postulated that antibody is an illness-sparing mechanism for protecting mice from RSV infection, and that T lymphocytes are an important determinant of illness. Further delineation of RSV-induced immunopathogenesis in primary infection and reinfection will provide important information for the development of vaccine strategies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Respiratory virus immunization. I. A field trial of two inactivated respiratory virus vaccines; an aqueous trivalent parainfluenza virus vaccine and an alum-precipitated respiratory syncytial virus vaccine.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Vaccine
                Vaccine
                Vaccine
                Elsevier Science
                0264-410X
                1873-2518
                05 October 2012
                05 October 2012
                : 30
                : 45
                : 6382-6388
                Affiliations
                [a ]Division of Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Utrecht, Yalelaan 1, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [b ]Division of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Utrecht, Yalelaan 1, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [c ]D. Smith Center for Vaccine Biology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
                [d ]School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
                [e ]Department of Vaccinology, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
                [f ]Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Technische Universität München, Trogerstrasse 30, 81675 München, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding authors at: Division of Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Utrecht, Yalelaan 1, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 302532471; fax: +31 302533555. d.zaiss@ 123456uu.nl e.j.a.m.sijts@ 123456uu.nl
                Article
                JVAC13477
                10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.08.027
                3465553
                22940382
                bb9d18f8-350b-42e9-8a5f-c857782ed236
                © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                : 10 April 2012
                : 25 July 2012
                : 15 August 2012
                Categories
                Article

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                vaccine,ns, nonstructural,eid, egg id,pvm, pneunomia virus of mice,cd8+ t-cell,nk, natural killer,nk cell,i.v., intravenous,p.i., post infection,hrsv, human respiratory syncytial virus,pneumoviruses,mln, mediastinal lymph node,bal, bronchoalveolar lavage,pfu, plaque forming units,id, infectious dose,pneunomia virus of mice,i.n., intranasal,dcp, peptide-loaded dc,sem, standard error of mean,dc, dendritic cell,balf, bal fluid,i.p., intraperitoneal,bm-dc, bone marrow derived dc,fi, formalin inactivated

                Comments

                Comment on this article