28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Patient-centred innovation to ensure access to diabetes care in Cambodia: the case of MoPoTsyo

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The increasing prevalence of chronic diseases puts a high burden on the health care systems of Low and Middle Income Countries which are often not adapted to provide the care needed. Peer support programmes are promoted to address health system constraints. This case study analyses a peer educator diabetes programme in Cambodia, MoPoTsyo, from a health system’s perspective. Which strategies were used and how did these strategies change? How is the programme perceived?

          Methods

          Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with patients, MoPoTsyo staff and peer educators, contracted pharmacy staff and health workers, health care workers and non-contracted pharmacists and managers and policy makers at district, provincial and national level. Four areas were purposively selected to do the interviews. An inductive content analysis was done independently by two researchers.

          Results

          MoPoTsyo developed into three stages: a focus on diabetes self-management; a widening scope to ensure affordable medicines and access to other health care services; and aiming for sustainability through more integration with the Cambodian public system and further upscaling. All respondents acknowledged the peer educators’ role and competence in patient education, but their ideas about additional tasks and their place in the system differed. Indirectly involved stakeholders and district managers emphasized the particular roles and responsibilities of all actors in the system and the particular role of the peer educator in the community. MoPoTsyo’s diagnostics and laboratory services were perceived as useful, especially by patients and project staff. Respondents were positive about the revolving drug fund, but expressed concerns about its integration into the government system. The degree of collaboration between health care staff and peer educators varied.

          Conclusion

          MoPoTsyo responds to the needs of people with diabetes in Cambodia. Key success factors were: consistent focus on and involvement of the target group, backed up by a strong organisation; simultaneous reduction of other barriers to care; and the ongoing maintenance of relations at all levels within the health system. Despite resistance, MoPoTsyo has established a more balanced relationship between patients and health service providers, empowering patients to self-manage and access services that meet their needs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease.

          For patients with chronic disease, there is growing interest in "self-management" programs that emphasize the patients' central role in managing their illness. A recent randomized clinical trial demonstrated the potential of self-management to improve health status and reduce health care utilization in patients with chronic diseases. To evaluate outcomes of a chronic disease self-management program in a real-world" setting. Before-after cohort study. Of the 613 patients from various Kaiser Permanente hospitals and clinics recruited for the study, 489 had complete baseline and follow-up data. The Chronic Disease Self-Management Program is a 7-week, small-group intervention attended by people with different chronic conditions. It is taught largely by peer instructors from a highly structured manual. The program is based on self-efficacy theory and emphasizes problem solving, decision making, and confidence building. Health behavior, self-efficacy (confidence in ability to deal with health problems), health status, and health care utilization, assessed at baseline and at 12 months by self-administered questionnaires. At 1 year, participants in the program experienced statistically significant improvements in health behaviors (exercise, cognitive symptom management, and communication with physicians), self-efficacy, and health status (fatigue, shortness of breath, pain, role function, depression, and health distress) and had fewer visits to the emergency department (ED) (0.4 visits in the 6 months prior to baseline, compared with 0.3 in the 6 months prior to follow-up; P = 0.05). There were slightly fewer outpatient visits to physicians and fewer days in hospital, but the differences were not statistically significant. Results were of about the same magnitude as those observed in a previous randomized, controlled trial. Program costs were estimated to be about $200 per participant. We replicated the results of our previous clinical trial of a chronic disease self-management program in a "real-world" setting. One year after exposure to the program, most patients experienced statistically significant improvements in a variety of health outcomes and had fewer ED visits.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Building the Field of Health Policy and Systems Research: Framing the Questions

            In the first of a series of articles addressing the current challenges and opportunities for the development of Health Policy & Systems Research (HPSR), Kabir Sheikh and colleagues lay out the main questions vexing the field.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Peer support for self-management of diabetes improved outcomes in international settings.

              Self-management of diabetes is essential to reducing the risks of associated disabilities. But effective self-management is often short-lived. Peers can provide the kind of ongoing support that is needed for sustained self-management of diabetes. In this context, peers are nonprofessionals who have diabetes or close familiarity with its management. Key functions of effective peer support include assistance in daily management, social and emotional support, linkage to clinical care, and ongoing availability of support. Using these four functions as a template of peer support, project teams in Cameroon, South Africa, Thailand, and Uganda developed and then evaluated peer support interventions for adults with diabetes. Our initial assessment found improvements in symptom management, diet, blood pressure, body mass index, and blood sugar levels for many of those taking part in the programs. For policy makers, the broader message is that by emphasizing the four key peer support functions, diabetes management programs can be successfully introduced across varied cultural settings and within diverse health systems.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jvanolmen@itg.be
                natalie.eggermont@gmail.com
                mauritsvanpelt@gmail.com
                mopo.meofficer@gmail.com
                jero.deman@gmail.com
                F.Schellevis@vumc.nl
                dpeters@jhu.edu
                BigdeliM@who.int
                Journal
                J Pharm Policy Pract
                J Pharm Policy Pract
                Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
                BioMed Central (London )
                2052-3211
                21 January 2016
                21 January 2016
                2016
                : 9
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Public Health Antwerp, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
                [ ]Department of General Practice & Elderly Medicine, EMGO, Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]University Hospital, University Hospital Brussels, Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, Belgium
                [ ]MoPoTsyo, #9E, Street 3C, Phum Trea 1, Stung Meanchey, 12352 Phnom Penh Cambodia
                [ ]NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Otterstraat 118-124, Utrecht, 3513 CR The Netherlands
                [ ]Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
                [ ]World Health Organisation, Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, 20 avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
                Article
                50
                10.1186/s40545-016-0050-1
                4720995
                26798483
                bb9e58c1-c20b-427c-8079-d8e8416c3808
                © van Olmen et al. 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 14 August 2015
                : 11 January 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: WHO Alliance for Health Systems and Policy Research
                Funded by: International Diabetes Federation
                Award ID: LT10-341
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                chronic diseases,chronic conditions,chronic care,diabetes care,patient-centred,self management,peer educator,health systems research,health system analysis,stakeholder analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article