13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Foveal Damage Due to Subfoveal Hemorrhage Associated with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To investigate the functional and morphologic prognoses of eyes with subfoveal hemorrhage from acute branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), and to examine the effect of intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IVR) on these prognoses, we assessed 81 eyes with acute BRVO, of which 38 did not receive IVR [IVR(-) group], and 43 were treated with IVR [IVR(+) group] for macular edema. The foveal morphologic changes were examined via optical coherence tomography (OCT). At initial examination, 63 eyes exhibited subfoveal hemorrhage. At final examination, the defect lengths in the foveal external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid lines in these eyes were longer, and final VA was significantly poorer, compared with eyes without subfoveal hemorrhage. In comparisons between the final measurements in eyes with subfoveal hemorrhage in the IVR(-) and IVR(+) groups, while there were no differences in initial ocular conditions, final VA was significantly better in the IVR(+) group. The defects in the ELM and ellipsoid lines in the IVR(+) group were shorter than those of the IVR(-) group ( p = 0.002 in both). Final VA was correlated with the defect lengths of foveal ELM and ellipsoid lines in both the IVR(-) and IVR(+) groups (both p < 0.001). In addition, the defect lengths of foveal ELM and ellipsoid lines were closely correlated with the duration of subfoveal hemorrhage (both p < 0.001). BRVO-associated subfoveal hemorrhage caused damage to the foveal photoreceptors, and visual dysfunction. However, IVR improved these prognoses, by accelerating the absorption of the subfoveal hemorrhage.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Sustained benefits from ranibizumab for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion: 12-month outcomes of a phase III study.

          Assess 12-month efficacy and safety of intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab in patients with macular edema after branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Prospective, randomized, sham injection-controlled, double-masked, multicenter trial. A total of 397 patients with macular edema after BRVO. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1 to 6 monthly injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab or sham injections. After 6 months, all patients with study eye best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤20/40 or central subfield thickness ≥250 μm were to receive ranibizumab. Patients could receive rescue laser treatment once during the treatment period and once during the observation period if criteria were met. The main efficacy outcome reported is mean change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 12. Additional visual and anatomic parameters were assessed. Mean (95% confidence interval) change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 12 was 16.4 (14.5-18.4) and 18.3 (15.8-20.9) in the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg groups, respectively, and 12.1 (9.6-14.6) in the sham/0.5 mg group (P<0.01, each ranibizumab group vs. sham/0.5 mg). The percentage of patients who gained ≥15 letters from baseline BCVA at month 12 was 56.0% and 60.3% in the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg groups, respectively, and 43.9% in the sham/0.5 mg group. On average, there was a marked reduction in central foveal thickness (CFT) after the first as-needed injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab in the sham/0.5 mg group, which was sustained through month 12. No new ocular or nonocular safety events were identified. At month 12, treatment with ranibizumab as needed during months 6-11 maintained, on average, the benefits achieved by 6 monthly ranibizumab injections in patients with macular edema after BRVO, with low rates of ocular and nonocular safety events. In the sham/0.5 mg group, treatment with ranibizumab as needed for 6 months resulted in rapid reduction in CFT to a similar level as that in the 0.3 mg ranibizumab treatment group and an improvement in BCVA, but not to the extent of that in the 2 ranibizumab groups. Intraocular injections of ranibizumab provide an effective treatment for macular edema after BRVO. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ranibizumab for macular edema due to retinal vein occlusions: long-term follow-up in the HORIZON trial.

            To assess long-term safety and efficacy of intraocular ranibizumab injections in patients with macular edema after retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Open-label extension trial of the 12-month Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety (BRAVO) and Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Study: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety (CRUISE) trials. We included 304 patients who completed BRAVO and 304 patients who completed CRUISE. Patients were seen at least every 3 months and given an intraocular injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab if they met prespecified retreatment criteria. Primary outcomes were incidence and severity of ocular and nonocular adverse events (AEs). Key efficacy outcomes included mean change from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol and central foveal thickness. In patients who completed month 12, the mean number of injections (excluding month 12 injection) in the sham/0.5-, 0.3/0.5-, and 0.5-mg groups was 2.0, 2.4, and 2.1 (branch RVO) and 2.9, 3.8, and 3.5 (central RVO), respectively. The incidence of study eye ocular serious AEs (SAEs) and SAEs potentially related to systemic vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition across treatment arms was 2% to 9% and 1% to 6%, respectively. The mean change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 12 in branch RVO patients was 0.9 (sham/0.5 mg), -2.3 (0.3/0.5 mg), and -0.7 (0.5 mg), respectively. The mean change from baseline BCVA at month 12 in central RVO patients was -4.2 (sham/0.5 mg), -5.2 (0.3/0.5 mg), and -4.1 (0.5 mg), respectively. No new safety events were identified with long-term use of ranibizumab; rates of SAEs potentially related to treatment were consistent with prior ranibizumab trials. Reduced follow-up and fewer ranibizumab injections in the second year of treatment were associated with a decline in vision in central RVO patients, but vision in branch RVO patients remained stable. Results suggest that during the second year of ranibizumab treatment of RVO patients, follow-up and injections should be individualized and, on average, central RVO patients may require more frequent follow-up than every 3 months. Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Long-term outcomes in patients with retinal vein occlusion treated with ranibizumab: the RETAIN study.

              To determine long-term outcomes of patients with ranibizumab-treated retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Prospective follow-up of a subset of patients from 2 phase 3 trials. Thirty-four patients with branch RVO (BRVO) and 32 with central RVO (CRVO) who completed the Genentech-sponsored ranibizumab study RVO trials. Patients seen every month in year 1 and at least every 3 months in year 2 were treated with ranibizumab for intraretinal fluid. Patients requiring injections on consecutive visits were treated with ranibizumab plus scatter photocoagulation. Mean improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and percentage of patients with edema resolution. With a mean follow-up of 49.0 months, 17 of 34 BRVO patients (50%) had edema resolution defined as no intraretinal fluid for 6 months or more after the last injection. The last injection was given within 2 years of treatment initiation in 76%. The mean number of injections required in unresolved patients in year 4 was 3.2. In patients with resolved edema mean improvement in BCVA was 25.9 letters versus 17.1 letters (P = 0.09) in unresolved patients, and in both groups, approximately 80% had a final BCVA of 20/40 or better. With a mean follow-up of 49.7 months, 14 of 32 CRVO patients (44%) had edema resolution, with 71% receiving their last injection within 2 years of treatment initiation. The mean number of injections in unresolved patients in year 4 was 5.9. Compared with patients with unresolved CRVO, patients with resolved disease had greater improvement in BCVA (25.2 vs. 4.3 letters; P = 0.002), and a greater percentage had a final BCVA of 20/40 or better (64.3% vs. 27.8%; P = 0.04). Nine patients with BRVO and 9 with CRVO received scatter photocoagulation, and with mean follow-up of 9 months (BRVO) and 11 months (CRVO) after last laser, only 1 in each group had resolution of edema. Long-term outcomes in BRVO patients treated with ranibizumab were excellent, and although half still required occasional injections after 4 years, they maintained good visual potential. A substantial minority (44%) of patients with ranibizumab-treated CRVO had edema resolution and a good outcome within 4 years, but most (56%) still required frequent injections, had reduced visual potential, and have a guarded prognosis. Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                14 December 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 12
                : e0144894
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
                [2 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa, Japan
                LV Prasad Eye Institute, INDIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: A. Tsujikawa has received grant support from Pfizer, Novartis Pharma K.K., Alcon, and Bayer (unrelated to this study). Kiyoshi Suzuma has received grant support from Novartis Pharma K.K. (unrelated to this study). Nagahisa Yoshimura has received financial support from Topcon Corporation, Nidek and Canon (unrelated to this study) and has provided consultancy services to Nidek. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: YM. Performed the experiments: YM A. Tsujikawa TM SO. Analyzed the data: YM A. Tsujikawa A. Takahashi YI TM SO KS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: YM A. Tsujikawa A. Takahashi YI TM SO KS AU NY. Wrote the paper: YM A. Tsujikawa.

                Article
                PONE-D-15-42340
                10.1371/journal.pone.0144894
                4677927
                26661582
                bbaddb76-12bc-4210-8ded-635ef6072b7f
                © 2015 Muraoka et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 25 September 2015
                : 24 November 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 5, Pages: 16
                Funding
                This study was supported in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Tokyo, Japan (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research, no. 21592256), the Japan National Society for the Prevention of Blindness, Tokyo, Japan, Novartis Pharma K.K., Tokyo, Japan, the Innovative Techno-Hub for Integrated Medical Bio-Imaging of the Project for Developing Innovation Systems, from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan. No additional external funding was received for this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are available in the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article