5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Impact of High-risk Features and Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Urothelial Cancer Patients with Invasion into the Lamina Propria on Transurethral Resection in the Absence of Deep Muscle Invasion

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4077911e171">Background</h5> <p id="P2">High-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) that invades into the lamina propria is frequently understaged and is associated with a risk of lymph node metastasis and death. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4077911e176">Objective</h5> <p id="P3">To identify high-risk features (HRFs) for NMIBC that may identify patients with poorer prognosis who may benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to radical cystectomy (RC). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4077911e181">Design, setting, and participants</h5> <p id="P4">We performed a single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent RC for NMIBC with invasion into the lamina propria between 1995 and 2013. HRFs included hydronephrosis, abnormal examination under anesthesia, lymphovascular invasion, or variant histology. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4077911e186">Outcome measurements and statistical analysis</h5> <p id="P5">Pathology at RC, and overall (OS) and disease-specific (DSS) survival were evaluated and analyzed by Fisher’s exact test, Student <i>t</i> test, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, and the Kaplan–Meier method. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S5"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4077911e194">Results and limitations</h5> <p id="P6">We identified 336 patients with a median follow-up of 130 mo. Of these, 159 (47%) had no HRF, 140 (41.5%) had one HRF, and 37 (11%) had ≥2 HRFs. At RC, patients with ≥2 HRFs had a significantly higher rate of pathologic T stage upstaging and lymph node metastasis ( <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Median OS was 139 mo for those with no HRF, 127 mo for those with one HRF, and 56 mo for those with ≥2 HRF ( <i>p</i> = 0.0057). HRFs are also associated with a decreased DSS ( <i>p</i> = 0.0009). Patients with ≥2 HRFs (11/37) who received NAC showed improved OS (21% vs 55% 5-yr OS, <i>p</i> = 0.0353) and trended toward an improvement in DSS (25% vs 56% 5-yr OS, <i>p</i> = 0.0716) compared with RC alone. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S6"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4077911e214">Conclusions</h5> <p id="P7">The presence of ≥2 HRFs in NMIBC invading the lamina propria is associated with worse pathology at RC and a significant decrease in OS and DSS. NAC appears to provide benefit for these patients. Limitations include retrospective design and limited sample size. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S7"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4077911e219">Patient summary</h5> <p id="P8">The presence of high-risk features in urothelial cancer with invasion into the lamina propria has a worse prognosis that may be mitigated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          European Urology Focus
          European Urology Focus
          Elsevier BV
          24054569
          December 2017
          December 2017
          : 3
          : 6
          : 577-583
          Article
          10.1016/j.euf.2017.06.004
          5767145
          28753816
          bbb387df-a11c-4c7d-9d7f-e134a48051cc
          © 2017

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article