1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Paternal indifference and neglect in early life and creativity: Exploring the moderating role of TPH1 genotype and offspring gender

      research-article
      , , , *
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          For further understanding the joint contribution of environment, heredity and gender to creativity, the present research examined the prospective impact of paternal indifference & neglect in early life, TPH1 rs623580, offspring gender, and the interaction effects thereof on creativity in five hundred and thirty-nine unrelated healthy Chinese undergraduate students. Paternal indifference & neglect in early life was assessed on the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) and creativity on the Runco Creativity Assessment Battery (rCAB). Two primary findings emerged. Firstly, significant paternal indifference & neglect × TPH1 genotype interaction effects were identified in predicting all three dimensions of creativity (fluency, originality, and flexibility). Paternal indifference & neglect in early life negatively predicted fluency, originality, and flexibility when individuals carry A allele of TPH1 (rs623580). Secondly, there was a significant interaction effect of TPH1 genotype by offspring gender on flexibility. Only in males, individuals who carry A allele were linked with lower level of flexibility compared to TT homozygote individuals. No significant three-way interaction was found. In conclusion, the current findings provided the first preliminary evidence for the moderation effect of TPH1 on the relationship between parenting and creativity, and TPH1- offspring gender interaction on creativity; future studies are needed to validate these findings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Why Isn't Creativity More Important to Educational Psychologists? Potentials, Pitfalls, and Future Directions in Creativity Research

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fathers and mothers at play with their 2- and 3-year-olds: contributions to language and cognitive development.

            Father-child and mother-child engagements were examined longitudinally in relation to children's language and cognitive development at 24 and 36 months. The study involved a racially/ethnically diverse sample of low-income, resident fathers (and their partners) from the National Early Head Start evaluation study (n=290). Father-child and mother-child engagements were videotaped for 10 min at home during semistructured free play, and children's language and cognitive status were assessed at both ages. Fathers' and mothers' supportive parenting independently predicted children's outcomes after covarying significant demographic factors. Moreover, fathers' education and income were uniquely associated with child measures, and fathers' education consistently predicted the quality of mother-child engagements. Findings suggest direct and indirect effects of fathering on child development.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: the integration of product, person, and process perspectives.

              Psychologists have primarily investigated scientific creativity from 2 contrasting in vitro perspectives: correlational studies of the creative person and experimental studies of the creative process. Here the same phenomenon is scrutinized using a 3rd, in vivo perspective, namely, the actual creative products that emerge from individual scientific careers and communities of creative scientists. This behavioral analysis supports the inference that scientific creativity constitutes a form of constrained stochastic behavior. That is, it can be accurately modeled as a quasi-random combinatorial process. Key findings from both correlational and experimental research traditions corroborate this conclusion. The author closes the article by arguing that all 3 perspectives--regarding the product, person, and process--must be integrated into a unified view of scientific creativity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – review & editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                29 July 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 7
                : e0221383
                Affiliations
                [001]Department of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
                Southwest University, CHINA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5033-1559
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7396-5821
                Article
                PONE-D-19-21789
                10.1371/journal.pone.0221383
                7390402
                32726303
                bbf13306-adc6-437c-831a-46e2bd3d7a16
                © 2020 Yu et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 2 August 2019
                : 17 May 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, Pages: 15
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809, National Natural Science Foundation of China;
                Award ID: 31470999
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809, National Natural Science Foundation of China;
                Award ID: 31771235
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Key special project of national key research and development program of China
                Award ID: SQ2017YFB1400102
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Shandong Provincial Institute of Qilu Cultural Studies
                Award Recipient :
                This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31470999, 31771235), Key special project of national key research and development program of China (SQ2017YFB1400102) and Shandong Provincial Institute of Qilu Cultural Studies to JZ. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Creativity
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Creativity
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Creativity
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Age Groups
                Children
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Families
                Children
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Parenting Behavior
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Parenting Behavior
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Intelligence
                Human Intelligence
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Intelligence
                Human Intelligence
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Intelligence
                Human Intelligence
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Families
                Fathers
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Emotions
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Emotions
                Custom metadata
                We have uploaded the minimal anonymized data set as Supporting Information files (S1_DATA).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article