112
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares

      We invite you to submit your manuscript to APA's open access journal, Technology, Mind, and Behavior.

      Learn more and submit.

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Recognition of Emotions Conveyed by Emoticons and Emojis: A Systematic Literature Review

      article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The growing interest for emoticons and emojis has recently led to research examining their use and impact on various behaviors. As emoticons and emojis may lead to misinterpretations and misunderstandings between senders and recipients in online communication, it is necessary to examine whether emotions conveyed by these symbols are well recognized by individuals. In this perspective, a systematic review from 2001 to 2021 using the Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method was conducted to determine which emoticons and emojis can help individuals to recognize emotions, and how the recognition of emotions based on emoticons and emojis is studied. A total of 501 articles were screened from three major databases in psychology, and 23 articles met the predefined inclusion criteria. The results suggest that the recognition of emotions should be examined before using emoticons in larger studies. They also revealed that the recognition varied according to the methods used to assess the valence of emoticons or to attribute a specific emotion to them (self-report, free expression, or categorization). Finally, a summary Table of the emotions conveyed by emoticons and emojis is proposed in this review.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

            Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Technology, Mind, and Behavior
                American Psychological Association
                2689-0208
                April 21, 2022
                : 3
                : 2
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Psychology, University Rennes, LP3C (Psychology Laboratory: Cognition, Behavior, Communication)
                Author notes
                Action Editor: Danielle S. McNamara was the action editor for this article.
                Funding: This work was supported by the French Investment program for the future (Digital innovation for educational excellence action). This research is a part of the ACTIF-eFRAN project (Digital training, research, and animation area).
                Disclosures: The authors have no competing interests to declare, and this research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
                Open Science Disclosures:

                The data are available at https://osf.io/qj8nr/

                The experimental materials are available at https://osf.io/qj8nr/

                [*] Anthony Cherbonnier, Department of Psychology, University Rennes, LP3C (Psychology Laboratory: Cognition, Behavior, Communication), F-35000 Rennes, France anthony.cherbonnier@gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3922-0150
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-8061
                Article
                2022-53885-001
                10.1037/tmb0000067
                bbf651ca-434a-484d-8d4a-e1e879086039
                © 2022 The Author(s)

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-ND). This license permits copying and redistributing the work in any medium or format for noncommercial use provided the original authors and source are credited and a link to the license is included in attribution. No derivative works are permitted under this license.

                History

                Education,Psychology,Vocational technology,Engineering,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                emojis,PRISMA,emotion,recognition of emotions,emoticons

                Comments

                Comment on this article