14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Assessing Patient Risk from Cancer and COVID-19: Managing Patient Distress

      review-article
      , MD, MSc 1 , 2 , * , , MD, PhD, FRCSC 3
      Urologic Oncology
      Elsevier Inc.
      COVID-19, urology, mental health illness, patient distress, cancer

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The rapid spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) beginning in Spring 2020 necessitated significant changes to day-to-day interactions in society, as well as to the practice of medicine. Particularly in patients with cancer, these changes can exacerbate the pre-existing psychological stress associated with cancer diagnosis and treatment.

          Methods

          We performed a narrative review, encompassing changes to cancer care as a result of COVID-19, the psychological effects of treatment delays, and strategies to mitigate these effects.

          Results

          A number of review articles and guideline bodies have provided guidance on patients for whom treatment may be safely delayed, including low-risk bladder, prostate and kidney tumors, as well as intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. Mental health diagnoses are prevalent in patients with genitourinary malignancies. Evidence regarding psychologic effects of deferred treatment is limited to those with low risk of disease related morbidity. In this population, psychologic distress attenuated with time. However, in the COVID-19 context, patients with advanced disease are particularly prone to psychologic distress, as are women and younger patients. Strategies to mitigate this distress are emerging and center on recognition from the treating oncologist with appropriate referral as necessary to psycho-oncology providers and engagement of peer-supports.

          Conclusions

          The COVID-19 pandemic has reshaped social structures and health care delivery. For patients with genitourinary malignancies, this may be associated with significant distress, particularly among those with advanced disease and those undergoing active treatment. Physicians treating these patients need to be aware of the psychologic stress the combined effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, cancer diagnosis, and cancer treatment can have and make appropriate referrals to support the holistic care of their patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes of 1591 Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 Admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy

          In December 2019, a novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2]) emerged in China and has spread globally, creating a pandemic. Information about the clinical characteristics of infected patients who require intensive care is limited.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patients with Cancer Appear More Vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2: A Multicenter Study during the COVID-19 Outbreak

            In a study of 105 patients with cancer and 536 without, all with confirmed COVID-19, cancer was predictive of more severe disease, with stage IV cancer, hematologic cancer, and lung cancer being associated with worse outcomes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Americans’ COVID-19 Stress, Coping, and Adherence to CDC Guidelines

              Importance Documenting Americans’ stress responses to an unprecedented pandemic and their degree of adherence to CDC guidelines is essential for mental health interventions and policy-making. Objective To provide the first snapshot of immediate impact of COVID-19 on Americans’ stress, coping, and guideline adherence. Design Data were collected from an online workers’ platform for survey research (Amazon’s Mechanical Turk) from April 7 to 9, 2020. The current data represents the baseline of a longitudinal study. Best practices for ensuring high-quality data were employed. Participants Individuals who are 18 years of age or older, living in the USA, and English-speaking were eligible for the study. Of 1086 unique responses, 1015 completed responses are included. Setting Population-based. Main Outcomes Exposure to and stressfulness of COVID-19 stressors, coping strategies, and adherence to CDC guidelines. Results The sample was 53.9% women (n = 547), with an average age of 38.9 years (SD = 13.50, range = 18–88), most of whom were White (n = 836, 82.4%), non-Hispanic (n = 929, 91.5%), and straight/heterosexual (n = 895, 88.2%); 40% were currently married (n = 407), and 21.6% (n = 219) were caregivers. About half (50.5%) endorsed having at least “mostly” enough money to meet their needs. Respondents’ locations across the USA ranged from 18.5% in the Northeast to 37.8% in the South. The most commonly experienced stressors were reading/hearing about the severity and contagiousness of COVID-19, uncertainty about length of quarantine and social distancing requirements, and changes to social and daily personal care routines. Financial concerns were rated most stressful. Younger age, female gender, and caregiver status increased risk for stressor exposure and greater degree of stressfulness. The most frequently reported strategies to manage stress were distraction, active coping, and seeking emotional social support. CDC guideline adherence was generally high, but several key social distancing and hygiene behaviors showed suboptimal adherence, particularly for men and younger adults. Conclusions and Relevance Americans have high COVID-19 stress exposure and some demographic subgroups appear particularly vulnerable to stress effects. Subgroups less likely to adhere to CDC guidelines may benefit from targeted information campaigns. these findings may guide mental health interventions and inform policy-making regarding implications of specific public health measures.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Urol Oncol
                Urol Oncol
                Urologic Oncology
                Elsevier Inc.
                1078-1439
                1873-2496
                26 January 2021
                26 January 2021
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Georgia – Augusta University, Augusta, GA
                [2 ]Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta, GA
                [3 ]Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding Author. Zachary Klaassen, MD, MSc, Assistant Professor, Surgery/Urology, Medical College of Georgia – Augusta University; Georgia Cancer Center, 1120 15 th Street BA-8414, Augusta, GA 30912. Tel: 706-721-2519; Fax: 706-721-2548
                Article
                S1078-1439(21)00050-8
                10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.023
                7834973
                33558139
                bc2d66c6-4817-45c3-ad48-19da77f2b7c2
                © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 16 August 2020
                : 14 January 2021
                : 21 January 2021
                Categories
                Seminars Article

                covid-19,urology,mental health illness,patient distress,cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article