61
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluating the dissemination and scale-up of two evidence-based parenting interventions to reduce violence against children: study protocol

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Eliminating violence against children is a prominent policy goal, codified in the Sustainable Development Goals, and parenting programs are one approach to preventing and reducing violence. However, we know relatively little about dissemination and scale-up of parenting programs, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The scale-up of two parenting programs, Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH) for Young Children and PLH for Parents and Teens, developed under Creative Commons licensing and tested in randomized trials, provides a unique opportunity to study their dissemination in 25 LMICs.

          Methods

          The Scale-Up of Parenting Evaluation Research (SUPER) study uses a range of methods to study the dissemination of these two programs. The study will examine (1) process and extent of dissemination and scale-up, (2) how the programs are implemented and factors associated with variation in implementation, (3) violence against children and family outcomes before and after program implementation, (4) barriers and facilitators to sustained program delivery, and (5) costs and resources needed for implementation.

          Primary data collection, focused on three case study projects, will include interviews and focus groups with program facilitators, coordinators, funders, and other stakeholders, and a summary of key organizational characteristics. Program reports and budgets will be reviewed as part of relevant contextual information. Secondary data analysis of routine data collected within ongoing implementation and existing research studies will explore family enrolment and attendance, as well as family reports of parenting practices, violence against children, child behavior, and child and caregiver wellbeing before and after program participation. We will also examine data on staff sociodemographic and professional background, and their competent adherence to the program, collected as part of staff training and certification.

          Discussion

          This project will be the first study of its kind to draw on multiple data sources and methods to examine the dissemination and scale-up of a parenting program across multiple LMIC contexts. While this study reports on the implementation of two specific parenting programs, we anticipate that our findings will be of relevance across the field of parenting, as well as other violence prevention and social programs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

            Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups). We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population

              L Radloff (1977)

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                yulia.shenderovich@spi.ox.ac.uk , y.shenderovich@gmail.com
                Journal
                Implement Sci Commun
                Implement Sci Commun
                Implementation Science Communications
                BioMed Central (London )
                2662-2211
                7 December 2020
                7 December 2020
                2020
                : 1
                : 109
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4991.5, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, , University of Oxford, ; Oxford, UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.7836.a, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 1151, Department of Psychology, , University of Cape Town, ; Cape Town, South Africa
                [3 ]GRID grid.8756.c, ISNI 0000 0001 2193 314X, MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, , University of Glasgow, ; Glasgow, Scotland
                [4 ]GRID grid.420479.c, ISNI 0000 0001 0754 3962, Catholic Relief Services, ; Baltimore, USA
                [5 ]Clowns Without Borders South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa
                [6 ]GRID grid.11956.3a, ISNI 0000 0001 2214 904X, Institute for Life Course Health Research, Department of Global Health, , Stellenbosch University, ; Stellenbosch, South Africa
                [7 ]School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queens University, Belfast, UK
                [8 ]GRID grid.7362.0, ISNI 0000000118820937, School of Psychology, , Bangor University, ; Bangor, Wales
                [9 ]GRID grid.7836.a, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 1151, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, , University of Cape Town, ; Cape Town, South Africa
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0254-3397
                Article
                86
                10.1186/s43058-020-00086-6
                7719848
                32885176
                bc3da35d-e7d6-451a-b439-61fbabda26c2
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 22 September 2020
                : 12 October 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: UK Research and Innovation Global Challenges Research Fund
                Award ID: ES/S008101/1
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Complexity in Health Improvement Program of the Medical Research Council UK
                Award ID: MC_UU 12017/14
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010663, European Research Council;
                Award ID: No. 737476 and No. 771468
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Research Foundation of South Africa
                Award ID: 118571
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100001275, Oak Foundation;
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                evidence-based practice implementation,parenting,violence against children,scale-up,dissemination

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log