145
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    4
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Social capital and health – implications for health promotion

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article is a review of the PhD Thesis of Malin Eriksson, entitled ‘Social capital, health and community action – implications for health promotion.’ The article presents a theoretical overview of social capital and its relation to health, reviews empirical findings of the links between social capital and (self-rated) health, and discusses the usefulness of social capital in health promotion interventions at individual and community levels. Social capital, conceptualized as an individual characteristic, can contribute to the field of health promotion by adding new knowledge on how social network interventions may best be designed to meet the needs of the target group. The distinction of different forms of social capital, i.e. bonding, bridging, and linking, can be useful in mapping the kinds of networks that are available and health-enhancing (or damaging) and for whom. Further, social capital can advance social network interventions by acknowledging the risk for unequal distribution of investments and returns from social network involvement. Social capital, conceptualized as characterizing whole communities, provides a useful framework for what constitutes health-supporting environments and guidance on how to achieve them. Mapping and mobilization of social capital in local communities may be one way of achieving community action for health promotion. Social capital is context-bound by necessity. Thus, from a global perspective, it cannot be used as a ‘cookbook’ on how to achieve supportive environments and community action smoothly. However, social capital can provide new ideas on the processes that influence human interactions, cooperation, and community action for health promotion in various contexts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Social capital, income inequality, and mortality.

            Recent studies have demonstrated that income inequality is related to mortality rates. It was hypothesized, in this study, that income inequality is related to reduction in social cohesion and that disinvestment in social capital is in turn associated with increased mortality. In this cross-sectional ecologic study based on data from 39 states, social capital was measured by weighted responses to two items from the General Social Survey: per capita density of membership in voluntary groups in each state and level of social trust, as gauged by the proportion of residents in each state who believed that people could be trusted. Age-standardized total and cause-specific mortality rates in 1990 were obtained for each state. Income inequality was strongly correlated with both per capita group membership (r = -.46) and lack of social trust (r = .76). In turn, both social trust and group membership were associated with total mortality, as well as rates of death from coronary heart disease, malignant neoplasms, and infant mortality. These data support the notion that income inequality leads to increased mortality via disinvestment in social capital.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential.

              Contemporary public health emphasizes a community-based approach to health promotion and disease prevention. The evidence from the past 20 years indicates, however, that many community-based programs have had only modest impact, with the notable exception of a number of HIV prevention programs. To better understand the reasons for these outcomes, we conducted a systematic literature review of 32 community-based prevention programs. Reasons for poor performance include methodological challenges to study design and evaluation, concurrent secular trends, smaller-than-expected effect sizes, limitations of the interventions, and limitations of theories used. The effectiveness of HIV programs appears to be related in part to extensive formative research and an emphasis on changing social norms.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Glob Health Action
                GHA
                Global Health Action
                CoAction Publishing
                1654-9716
                1654-9880
                08 February 2011
                2011
                : 4
                : 10.3402/gha.v4i0.5611
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
                [2 ]Department of Social Work, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
                Author notes
                [* ] Malin Eriksson, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Social Work, Umeå University, SE-901 85 Umeå, Sweden. Tel: +46 (0) 90 785 3346. Fax: +46 (0) 90 13 8977. Email: malin.eriksson@ 123456socw.umu.se , malin.eriksson@ 123456epiph.umu.se
                Article
                GHA-4-5611
                10.3402/gha.v4i0.5611
                3036711
                21311607
                bc77a07f-2314-4551-be55-70cdb28a4fde
                © 2011 Malin Eriksson

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 10 September 2010
                : 29 November 2010
                : 02 December 2010
                Categories
                PhD REVIEW

                Health & Social care
                supportive environments,social capital,community action,social network interventions,health promotion,self-rated health

                Comments

                Comment on this article