58
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Binocular treatment of amblyopia using videogames (BRAVO): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Amblyopia is a common neurodevelopmental disorder of vision that is characterised by visual impairment in one eye and compromised binocular visual function. Existing evidence-based treatments for children include patching the nonamblyopic eye to encourage use of the amblyopic eye. Currently there are no widely accepted treatments available for adults with amblyopia. The aim of this trial is to assess the efficacy of a new binocular, videogame-based treatment for amblyopia in older children and adults. We hypothesise that binocular treatment will significantly improve amblyopic eye visual acuity relative to placebo treatment.

          Methods/design

          The BRAVO study is a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled multicentre trial to assess the effectiveness of a novel videogame-based binocular treatment for amblyopia. One hundred and eight participants aged 7 years or older with anisometropic and/or strabismic amblyopia (defined as ≥0.2 LogMAR interocular visual acuity difference, ≥0.3 LogMAR amblyopic eye visual acuity and no ocular disease) will be recruited via ophthalmologists, optometrists, clinical record searches and public advertisements at five sites in New Zealand, Canada, Hong Kong and Australia. Eligible participants will be randomised by computer in a 1:1 ratio, with stratification by age group: 7–12, 13–17 and 18 years and older. Participants will be randomised to receive 6 weeks of active or placebo home-based binocular treatment. Treatment will be in the form of a modified interactive falling-blocks game, implemented on a 5th generation iPod touch device viewed through red/green anaglyphic glasses. Participants and those assessing outcomes will be blinded to group assignment. The primary outcome is the change in best-corrected distance visual acuity in the amblyopic eye from baseline to 6 weeks post randomisation. Secondary outcomes include distance and near visual acuity, stereopsis, interocular suppression, angle of strabismus (where applicable) measured at baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 weeks post randomisation. Treatment compliance and acceptability will also be assessed along with quality of life for adult participants.

          Discussion

          The BRAVO study is the first randomised controlled trial of a home-based videogame treatment for older children and adults with amblyopia. The results will indicate whether a binocular approach to amblyopia treatment conducted at home is effective for patients aged 7 years or older.

          Trial registration

          This trial was registered in Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12613001004752) on 10 September 2013.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Amblyopia and binocular vision.

          Gary Birch (2013)
          Amblyopia is the most common cause of monocular visual loss in children, affecting 1.3%-3.6% of children. Current treatments are effective in reducing the visual acuity deficit but many amblyopic individuals are left with residual visual acuity deficits, ocular motor abnormalities, deficient fine motor skills, and risk for recurrent amblyopia. Using a combination of psychophysical, electrophysiological, imaging, risk factor analysis, and fine motor skill assessment, the primary role of binocular dysfunction in the genesis of amblyopia and the constellation of visual and motor deficits that accompany the visual acuity deficit has been identified. These findings motivated us to evaluate a new, binocular approach to amblyopia treatment with the goals of reducing or eliminating residual and recurrent amblyopia and of improving the deficient ocular motor function and fine motor skills that accompany amblyopia. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Amblyopia.

            Results from recent randomised clinical trials in amblyopia should change our approach to screening for and treatment of amblyopia. Based on the current evidence, if one screening session is used, screening at school entry could be the most reasonable time. Clinicians should preferably use age-appropriate LogMAR acuity tests, and treatment should only be considered for children who are clearly not in the typical range for their age. Any substantial refractive error should be corrected before further treatment is considered and the child should be followed in spectacles until no further improvement is recorded, which can take up to 6 months. Parents and carers should then be offered an informed choice between patching and atropine drops. Successful patching regimens can last as little as 1 h or 2 h a day, and successful atropine regimens as little as one drop twice a week. Intense and extended regimens might not be needed in initial therapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dichoptic training enables the adult amblyopic brain to learn.

              Adults with amblyopia, a common visual cortex disorder caused primarily by binocular disruption during an early critical period, do not respond to conventional therapy involving occlusion of one eye. But it is now clear that the adult human visual cortex has a significant degree of plasticity, suggesting that something must be actively preventing the adult brain from learning to see through the amblyopic eye. One possibility is an inhibitory signal from the contralateral eye that suppresses cortical inputs from the amblyopic eye. Such a gating mechanism could explain the apparent lack of plasticity within the adult amblyopic visual cortex. Here we provide direct evidence that alleviating suppression of the amblyopic eye through dichoptic stimulus presentation induces greater levels of plasticity than forced use of the amblyopic eye alone. This indicates that suppression is a key gating mechanism that prevents the amblyopic brain from learning to see. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                c.guo@auckland.ac.nz
                raiju.babu@uwaterloo.ca
                j.black@auckland.ac.nz
                wbobier@uwaterloo.ca
                carly.lam@polyu.edu.hk
                ShuanD@adhb.govt.nz
                t.gao@auckland.ac.nz
                r.hess@mcgill.ca
                m.jenkins@auckland.ac.nz
                y.jiang@auckland.ac.nz
                strabism@netspace.net.au
                v.parag@auckland.ac.nz
                j.south@auckland.ac.nz
                sandra.staffieri@unimelb.edu.au
                n.walker@auckland.ac.nz
                a.wadham@auckland.ac.nz
                ben.thompson@uwaterloo.ca
                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central (London )
                1745-6215
                18 October 2016
                18 October 2016
                2016
                : 17
                : 504
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Optometry and Vision Science, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
                [2 ]School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON Canada
                [3 ]School of Optometry, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR China
                [4 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Starship Children’s Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
                [5 ]Department of Ophthalmology, McGill Vision Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC Canada
                [6 ]National Institute for Health Innovation, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
                [7 ]Department of Surgery, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital; Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
                Article
                1635
                10.1186/s13063-016-1635-3
                5069878
                27756405
                bcaf5c54-4809-408a-884c-866c04394b09
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 28 April 2016
                : 30 September 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001505, Health Research Council of New Zealand;
                Award ID: 13/169
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100005847, Health and Medical Research Fund;
                Award ID: FHB / H 41 / 70
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Medicine
                amblyopia,binocular vision,suppression,plasticity,videogame,perceptual learning
                Medicine
                amblyopia, binocular vision, suppression, plasticity, videogame, perceptual learning

                Comments

                Comment on this article