18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Inhibition of MCP-1/CCR2 Signaling Does Not Inhibit Intimal Proliferation in a Mouse Aortic Transplant Model

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Transplant arteriopathy is the leading cause of long term morbidity and mortality following heart transplantation. Animal models have demonstrated that monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 is induced early after transplant in cardiac and aortic allografts. We have previously reported that deficiency of MCP-1 or its receptor, CC chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2), is associated with a reduction in intimal proliferation in a mouse femoral artery injury model. Using knockout mice, we have now examined the role of MCP-1 and CCR2 in the development of the intimal proliferation of transplant arteriopathy. Methods: C57Bl/6 CCR2 and MCP-1 wild-type and knockout mice were used in the studies and aortic transplants were performed between Balb/c mice and C57Bl/6 mice. Aortas from recipient animals were harvested 8 weeks after transplant. Results: Unlike arterial injury, in an aortic transplant model inhibition of MCP-1/CCR2 signaling did not result in reduced intimal proliferation. Conclusions: Despite a pathology that appears similar, the inflammatory mediators that regulate transplant arteriopathy differ from those regulating intimal proliferation secondary to wire injury. Our results suggest that targeting MCP-1/CCR2 signaling is not sufficient to block transplant arteriopathy across a complete MHC-mismatch barrier.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Everolimus for the prevention of allograft rejection and vasculopathy in cardiac-transplant recipients.

          Everolimus, a novel proliferation inhibitor and immunosuppressive agent, may suppress cardiac-allograft vasculopathy. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial comparing everolimus with azathioprine in recipients of a first heart transplant. A total of 634 patients were randomly assigned to receive 1.5 mg of everolimus per day (209 patients), 3.0 mg of everolimus per day (211 patients), or 1.0 to 3.0 mg of azathioprine per kilogram of body weight per day (214 patients), in combination with cyclosporine, corticosteroids, and statins. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death, graft loss or retransplantation, loss to follow-up, biopsy-proved acute rejection of grade 3A, or rejection with hemodynamic compromise. At six months, the percentage of patients who had reached the primary efficacy end point was significantly smaller in the group given 3.0 mg of everolimus (27.0 percent, P<0.001) and the group given 1.5 mg of everolimus (36.4 percent, P=0.03) than in the azathioprine group (46.7 percent). Intravascular ultrasonography showed that the average increase in maximal intimal thickness 12 months after transplantation was significantly smaller in the two everolimus groups than in the azathioprine group. The incidence of vasculopathy was also significantly lower in the 1.5-mg group (35.7 percent, P=0.045) and the 3.0-mg group (30.4 percent, P=0.01) than in the azathioprine group (52.8 percent). The rates of cytomegalovirus infection were significantly lower in the 1.5-mg group (7.7 percent, P<0.001) and the 3.0-mg group (7.6 percent, P<0.001) than in the azathioprine group (21.5 percent). Rates of bacterial infection were significantly higher in the 3.0-mg group than in the azathioprine group. Serum creatinine levels were also significantly higher in the two everolimus groups than in the azathioprine group. Everolimus was more efficacious than azathioprine in reducing the severity and incidence of cardiac-allograft vasculopathy, suggesting that everolimus therapy may alleviate this serious problem. Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Chronic Rejection

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Targeting of the chemokine receptor CCR1 suppresses development of acute and chronic cardiac allograft rejection.

              Although mononuclear cell infiltration is a hallmark of cellular rejection of a vascularized allograft, efforts to inhibit rejection by blocking leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesion have proved largely unsuccessful, perhaps in part because of persistent generation of chemokines within rejecting grafts. We now provide, to our knowledge, the first evidence that in vivo blockade of specific chemokine receptors is of therapeutic significance in organ transplantation. Inbred mice with a targeted deletion of the chemokine receptor CCR1 showed significant prolongation of allograft survival in 4 models. First, cardiac allografts across a class II mismatch were rejected by CCR1(+/+) recipients but were accepted permanently by CCR1(-/-) recipients. Second, CCR1(-/-) mice rejected completely class I- and class II-mismatched BALB/c cardiac allografts more slowly than control mice. Third, levels of cyclosporin A that had marginal effects in CCR1(+/+) mice resulted in permanent allograft acceptance in CCR1(-/-) recipients. These latter allografts showed no sign of chronic rejection 50-200 days after transplantation, and transfer of CD4(+) splenic T cells from these mice to naive allograft recipients significantly prolonged allograft survival, whereas cells from CCR1(+/+) mice conferred no such benefit. Finally, both CCR1(+/+) and CCR1(-/-) allograft recipients, when treated with a mAb to CD4, showed permanent engraftment, but these allografts showed florid chronic rejection in the former strain and were normal in CCR1(-/-) mice. We conclude that therapies to block CCR1/ligand interactions may prove useful in preventing acute and chronic rejection clinically.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JVR
                J Vasc Res
                10.1159/issn.1018-1172
                Journal of Vascular Research
                S. Karger AG
                1018-1172
                1423-0135
                2008
                October 2008
                07 May 2008
                : 45
                : 6
                : 538-546
                Affiliations
                aAab Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, N.Y., bZena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute and cDepartment of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, N.Y., dDepartment of Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., and eGladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif., USA; fSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
                Article
                129688 J Vasc Res 2008;45:538–546
                10.1159/000129688
                18463419
                bcc0fbcf-ace8-4353-b03a-7fc662e855a7
                © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 17 May 2007
                : 21 January 2008
                Page count
                Figures: 5, References: 41, Pages: 9
                Categories
                Research Paper

                General medicine,Neurology,Cardiovascular Medicine,Internal medicine,Nephrology
                MCP-1,Chemokines,Transplantation,Intimal hyperplasia,Smooth muscle cell

                Comments

                Comment on this article