Blog
About

3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prognostic differences between routine invasive and conservative strategies for the management of high-risk, non-ST segment acute coronary syndromes: Experience from two consecutive periods in a single center.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The optimal revascularization strategy for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) remains controversial, especially in a real world context. The objective of this work was to assess differences at 1 year in all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint of mortality or acute myocardial infarction (MI) between two management strategies for NSTE-ACS: a conservative strategy (CS) versus a routine invasive strategy (RIS).

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Eur. J. Intern. Med.
          European journal of internal medicine
          Elsevier BV
          0953-6205
          0953-6205
          Sep 2007
          : 18
          : 5
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
          Article
          S0953-6205(07)00142-2
          10.1016/j.ejim.2006.12.011
          17693230

          Comments

          Comment on this article