1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Outcome Predictors and Safety of Home Dobutamine Intravenous Infusion in End Stage Heart Failure Patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Patients in end-stage heart failure can experiment cardiogenic shock and may not be weanable from dobutamine. The fate of these patients is a challenge for doctors, patients, family, and the institution. Dobutamine use at home can be a solution. The aim of the present study was to assess the outcome, biological predictors, and safety of dobutamine use at home in dobutamine-dependent patients. All consecutive dobutamine-dependent patients discharged with continuous home intravenous dobutamine, from a single tertiary center between February 2014 and November 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 19 patients (age 65 ± 10 years) were followed for one year. At one-year, the survival rate was 32%, (6/19). Five (26%) patients had an adverse event related to the intravenous catheter. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the combination of a glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min and a brain natriuretic peptide level <1000 ng/L, were highly predictive of one-year survival (HR = 10.87, IC95% (5.78–36.44), p < 0.001). Management of dobutamine-unweanable patients after cardiogenic shock may involve dobutamine at home to permit a home return. This strategy allows a significant survival and few readmissions, and, if eligible, access to surgical strategies, such as heart transplantation. Simple biological markers at discharge can identify severe patients to refer to palliative care and good responders.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure.

          Implantable left ventricular assist devices have benefited patients with end-stage heart failure as a bridge to cardiac transplantation, but their long-term use for the purpose of enhancing survival and the quality of life has not been evaluated. We randomly assigned 129 patients with end-stage heart failure who were ineligible for cardiac transplantation to receive a left ventricular assist device (68 patients) or optimal medical management (61). All patients had symptoms of New York Heart Association class IV heart failure. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a reduction of 48 percent in the risk of death from any cause in the group that received left ventricular assist devices as compared with the medical-therapy group (relative risk, 0.52; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.78; P=0.001). The rates of survival at one year were 52 percent in the device group and 25 percent in the medical-therapy group (P=0.002), and the rates at two years were 23 percent and 8 percent (P=0.09), respectively. The frequency of serious adverse events in the device group was 2.35 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.86 to 2.95) times that in the medical-therapy group, with a predominance of infection, bleeding, and malfunction of the device. The quality of life was significantly improved at one year in the device group. The use of a left ventricular assist device in patients with advanced heart failure resulted in a clinically meaningful survival benefit and an improved quality of life. A left ventricular assist device is an acceptable alternative therapy in selected patients who are not candidates for cardiac transplantation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            B-type natriuretic peptide and prognosis in heart failure patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction.

            This study sought to determine the prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF), in comparison to data in HF patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) EF (≤40%). Management of patients with HFPEF is difficult. BNP is a useful biomarker in patients with reduced LVEF, but data in HFPEF are scarce. In this study, 615 patients with mild to moderate HF (mean age 70 years, LVEF 33%) were followed for 18 months. BNP concentrations were measured at baseline and were related to the primary outcome, that is, a composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization, and to mortality alone. The population was divided in quintiles, according to LVEF, and patients with reduced LVEF were compared with those with HFPEF. There were 257 patients (42%) who had a primary endpoint and 171 (28%) who died. BNP levels were significantly higher in patients with reduced LVEF than in those with HFPEF (p < 0.001). BNP was a strong predictor of outcome, but LVEF was not. Importantly, if similar levels of BNP were compared across the whole spectrum of LVEF, and for different cutoff levels of LVEF, the associated risk of adverse outcome was similar in HFPEF patients as in those with reduced LVEF. BNP levels are lower in patients with HFPEF than in patients with HF with reduced LVEF, but for a given BNP level, the prognosis in patients with HFPEF is as poor as in those with reduced LVEF. Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              How well does B-type natriuretic peptide predict death and cardiac events in patients with heart failure: systematic review.

              To assess how well B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) predicts prognosis in patients with heart failure. Systematic review of studies assessing BNP for prognosis in patients with heart failure or asymptomatic patients. Electronic searches of Medline and Embase from January 1994 to March 2004 and reference lists of included studies. We included all studies that estimated the relation between BNP measurement and the risk of death, cardiac death, sudden death, or cardiovascular event in patients with heart failure or asymptomatic patients, including initial values and changes in values in response to treatment. Multivariable models that included both BNP and left ventricular ejection fraction as predictors were used to compare the prognostic value of each variable. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. 19 studies used BNP to estimate the relative risk of death or cardiovascular events in heart failure patients and five studies in asymptomatic patients. In heart failure patients, each 100 pg/ml increase was associated with a 35% increase in the relative risk of death. BNP was used in 35 multivariable models of prognosis. In nine of the models, it was the only variable to reach significance-that is, other variables contained no prognostic information beyond that of BNP. Even allowing for the scale of the variables, it seems to be a strong indicator of risk. Although systematic reviews of prognostic studies have inherent difficulties, including the possibility of publication bias, the results of the studies in this review show that BNP is a strong prognostic indicator for both asymptomatic patients and for patients with heart failure at all stages of disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                10 June 2021
                June 2021
                : 10
                : 12
                : 2571
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Heart Failure and Transplant Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, “Louis Pradel” Cardiologic Hospital, 69002 Lyon, France; guillaume.baudry@ 123456chu-lyon.fr (G.B.); elisabeth.hugon-vallet@ 123456chu-lyon.fr (E.H.-V.); nathan.mewton@ 123456chu-lyon.fr (N.M.); laurent.sebbag@ 123456chu-lyon.fr (L.S.)
                [2 ]Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, “Louis Pradel” Cardiologic Hospital, 69002 Lyon, France; thomas.bochaton@ 123456chu-lyon.fr (T.B.); eric.bonnefoy-cudraz@ 123456chu-lyon.fr (E.B.-C.); danka.tomasevic@ 123456chu-lyon.fr (D.T.)
                [3 ]Department of Cardiac Surgery, Hospices Civils de Lyon, “Louis Pradel” Cardiologic Hospital, 69002 Lyon, France; matteo.pozzi@ 123456chu-lyon.fr (M.P.); jean-francois.obadia@ 123456chu-lyon.fr (J.-F.O.)
                [4 ]Clinical Investigation Center, Hospices Civils de Lyon, “Louis Pradel” Cardiologic Hospital, 69002 Lyon, France; camille.amaz@ 123456chu-lyon.fr
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5889-7506
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9200-2729
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1644-9542
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4811-3859
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4526-8129
                Article
                jcm-10-02571
                10.3390/jcm10122571
                8229659
                bd0cce6a-2d40-4fd4-a192-826aa50ddb7f
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 12 April 2021
                : 07 June 2021
                Categories
                Article

                end-stage heart failure,home dobutamine,mortality,safety

                Comments

                Comment on this article