4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Is the fast-track process efficient and safe for older adults admitted to the emergency department?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The efficiency of the fast-track (FT) process in the management of patients in Emergency Departments is well demonstrated, but there is a lack of research focused on older adults. The aim of our study was to verify whether the FT process is efficient and safe for older adults admitted to ED.

          Methods

          Observational case-control single-centre study.

          Results

          Five hundred four cases and 504 controls were analysed . The mean age was 75 years, and there was a predominance of women. In total 96% of subjects were classified with a “less-urgent” tag. The length of stay was significantly lower in the fast-track group than in the control group (median 178 min, interquartile range 184 min, and 115 min, interquartile range 69 min, respectively, p < 0.001), as well as the time spent between the ED physician’s visit and patient discharge (median 78 min, interquartile range 120 min, and median 3 min, interquartile range 6 min, respectively, p < 0.001). There weren’t any increases in the number of unplanned readmissions within 48 h, 7 days and 30 days.

          Conclusions

          The fast-track appears to be an efficient and safe strategy to improve the management of older adults admitted to the ED with minor complaints.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A systematic review of triage-related interventions to improve patient flow in emergency departments

          Background Overcrowding in emergency departments is a worldwide problem. A systematic literature review was undertaken to scientifically explore which interventions improve patient flow in emergency departments. Methods A systematic literature search for flow processes in emergency departments was followed by assessment of relevance and methodological quality of each individual study fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Studies were excluded if they did not present data on waiting time, length of stay, patients leaving the emergency department without being seen or other flow parameters based on a nonselected material of patients. Only studies with a control group, either in a randomized controlled trial or in an observational study with historical controls, were included. For each intervention, the level of scientific evidence was rated according to the GRADE system, launched by a WHO-supported working group. Results The interventions were grouped into streaming, fast track, team triage, point-of-care testing (performing laboratory analysis in the emergency department), and nurse-requested x-ray. Thirty-three studies, including over 800,000 patients in total, were included. Scientific evidence on the effect of fast track on waiting time, length of stay, and left without being seen was moderately strong. The effect of team triage on left without being seen was relatively strong, but the evidence for all other interventions was limited or insufficient. Conclusions Introducing fast track for patients with less severe symptoms results in shorter waiting time, shorter length of stay, and fewer patients leaving without being seen. Team triage, with a physician in the team, will probably result in shorter waiting time and shorter length of stay and most likely in fewer patients leaving without being seen. There is only limited scientific evidence that streaming of patients into different tracks, performing laboratory analysis in the emergency department or having nurses to request certain x-rays results in shorter waiting time and length of stay.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Length of Stay in the Emergency Department and Occurrence of Delirium in Older Medical Patients.

            To determine whether emergency department (ED) length of stay before ward admission is associated with incident delirium in older adults.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effects of a fast-track area on emergency department performance.

              To determine if a fast-track area (FTA) would improve Emergency Department (ED) performance, a historical cohort study was performed in the ED of a tertiary care adult hospital in the United States. Two 1-year consecutive periods, pre fast track area (FTA) opening-from February 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002 and after FTA opening-from February 1, 2002 to January 31, 2003 were studied. Daily values of the following variables were obtained from the ED patient tracking system: 1) To assess ED effectiveness: waiting time to be seen (WT), length of stay (LOS); 2) To assess ED care quality: rate of patients left without being seen (LWBS), mortality, and revisits; 3) To assess determinants of patient homogeneity between periods: daily census, age, acuity index, admission rate and emergent patient rate. For comparisons, the Wilcoxon test and the Student's t-test were used to analyze the data. Results showed that despite an increase in the daily census (difference [diff] 8.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6 to 11.41), FTA was associated with a decrease in WT (diff -51 min, 95% CI [-56 to -46]), LOS (diff -28 min, 95% CI [-31 to -23]) and LWBS (diff -4.06, 95% CI [-4.48 to -3.46]), without change in the rates of mortality or revisits. In conclusion, the opening of a FTA improved ED effectiveness, measured by decreased WT and LOS, without deterioration in the quality of care provided, measured by rates of mortality and revisits.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                beatricegasperini@hotmail.com
                Journal
                BMC Geriatr
                BMC Geriatr
                BMC Geriatrics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2318
                28 April 2020
                28 April 2020
                2020
                : 20
                : 154
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.476115.0, Department of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation, , Santa Croce Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, ; Viale Vittorio Veneto 2, 61032 Fano, Italy
                [2 ]GRID grid.9027.c, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 3630, Department of Economics, Statistical Section, , University of Perugia, ; Perugia, Italy
                [3 ]Agenzia Regionale Sanitaria-Regione Marche, Senigallia, Ancona Italy
                [4 ]Emergency Department Ospedale Principe di Piemonte, Area Vasta 2, Senigallia, AN Italy
                [5 ]Geriatria, Accettazione geriatrica e Centro di ricerca per l’invecchiamento, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9981-3460
                Article
                1536
                10.1186/s12877-020-01536-5
                7189513
                32345234
                bd116051-33e6-49d9-afba-9e34f2b41b1e
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 26 September 2019
                : 25 March 2020
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Geriatric medicine
                emergency department,fast-track,older adults,length of stay
                Geriatric medicine
                emergency department, fast-track, older adults, length of stay

                Comments

                Comment on this article