0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Drug Design, Development and Therapy (submit here)

      This international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal by Dove Medical Press focuses on the design and development of drugs, as well as the clinical outcomes, patient safety, and programs targeted at the effective and safe use of medicines. Sign up for email alerts here.

      88,007 Monthly downloads/views I 4.319 Impact Factor I 6.6 CiteScore I 1.12 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) I 0.784 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

       

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Nalbuphine May Be Superior to Sufentanil in Relieving Postcesarean Uterine Contraction Pain in Multiparas: A Retrospective Cohort Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Postcesarean pain remains a major complaint from puerperium women who have undergone cesarean section, especially uterine contraction induced visceral pain. The optimal opioid for pain relief after cesarean section (CS) is still unclear. The goal of this study was to compare the analgesic effect of Nalbuphine to Sufentanil in patients who underwent CS.

          Patients and Methods

          In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we included patients who received Nalbuphine or Sufentanil Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA) after CS between 1 January 2018 and 30 November 2020. Data on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at uterine contraction, at rest, and at movement, analgesic consumption, and side effects were collected. We performed logistic regression to identify predictors of severe uterine contraction pain.

          Results

          A total of 674 patients were identified in the unmatched cohort, and 612 patients in the matched one. Compared to the Sufentanil group, lower VAS-contraction was recorded in the Nalbuphine group in both the unmatched and matched cohorts, the mean difference (MD) on POD1 was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.54, p<0.001) and 0.28 (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.47, p<0.001), respectively, and the MD of POD2 was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.40, P=0.019) and 0.12 (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.41, P=0.026), respectively. On POD1 but not POD2, VAS-movement was lower in the Nalbuphine group as compared to the Sufentanil group. No difference was found between VAS-rest on POD1 and POD2 in both unmatched and matched cohorts. Less analgesic consumption, and side effects were recorded in the Nalbuphine group. Logistic regression indicated that multipara and analgesic consumption were risk factors for severe uterine contraction pain. In subgroup analysis, VAS-contraction was meaningfully reduced in the Nalbuphine group compared with the Sufentanil group in multipara patients, but not primiparas.

          Conclusion

          Compared to Sufentanil, Nalbuphine may provide better analgesia on uterine contraction pain. The superior analgesia may only exhibit in multiparas.

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates

          Background The caesarean section (CS) rate continues to increase across high-income, middle-income and low-income countries. We present current global and regional CS rates, trends since 1990 and projections for 2030. Methods We obtained nationally representative data on the CS rate from countries worldwide from 1990 to 2018. We used routine health information systems reports and population-based household surveys. Using the latest available data, we calculated current regional and subregional weighted averages. We estimated trends by a piecewise analysis of CS rates at the national, regional and global levels from 1990 to 2018. We projected the CS rate and the number of CS expected in 2030 using autoregressive integrated moving-average models. Results Latest available data (2010–2018) from 154 countries covering 94.5% of world live births shows that 21.1% of women gave birth by caesarean worldwide, averages ranging from 5% in sub-Saharan Africa to 42.8% in Latin America and the Caribbean. CS has risen in all regions since 1990. Subregions with the greatest increases were Eastern Asia, Western Asia and Northern Africa (44.9, 34.7 and 31.5 percentage point increase, respectively) while sub-Saharan Africa and Northern America (3.6 and 9.5 percentage point increase, respectively) had the lowest rise. Projections showed that by 2030, 28.5% of women worldwide will give birth by CS (38 million caesareans of which 33.5 million in LMIC annually) ranging from 7.1% in sub-Saharan Africa to 63.4% in Eastern Asia. Conclusion The use of CS has steadily increased worldwide and will continue increasing over the current decade where both unmet need and overuse are expected to coexist. In the absence of global effective interventions to revert the trend, Southern Asia and sub-Saharan Africa will face a complex scenario with morbidity and mortality associated with the unmet need, the unsafe provision of CS and with the concomitant overuse of the surgical procedure which drains resources and adds avoidable morbidity and mortality. If the Sustainable Development Goals are to be achieved, comprehensively addressing the CS issue is a global priority.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Limitations of the randomized controlled trial in evaluating population-based health interventions.

            Population- and systems-based interventions need evaluation, but the randomized controlled trial (RCT) research design has significant limitations when applied to their complexity. After some years of being largely dismissed in the ranking of evidence in medicine, alternatives to the RCT have been debated recently in public health and related population and social service fields to identify the trade-offs in their use when randomization is impractical or unethical. This review summarizes recent debates and considers the pragmatic and economic issues associated with evaluating whole-population interventions while maintaining scientific validity and credibility.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Declaration of Helsinki.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Drug Des Devel Ther
                Drug Des Devel Ther
                dddt
                Drug Design, Development and Therapy
                Dove
                1177-8881
                08 May 2023
                2023
                : 17
                : 1405-1415
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anesthesiology, Nanjing Pukou District Hospital of Chinese Medicine , Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
                [2 ]Central Laboratory, Pukou District of Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine , Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
                [3 ]Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University , Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
                [4 ]Department of Anesthesiology, Southeast University Zhongda Hospital , Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Jie Sun, Department of Anesthesiology, Southeast University Zhongda Hospital , Nanjing, 210009, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 25 83262523, Fax +86 25 83262526, Email dgsunjie@hotmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6778-2607
                Article
                394664
                10.2147/DDDT.S394664
                10178296
                bd364e14-63b6-4605-bcf6-276875554310
                © 2023 Zheng et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 12 January 2023
                : 01 May 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 9, References: 52, Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funded by: funding;
                The authors have no funding in this research.
                Categories
                Original Research

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                nalbuphine,patient-controlled intravenous analgesia,postcesarean pain,uterine contraction pain,multiparous patients

                Comments

                Comment on this article