34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies?

      Journal of public health medicine
      Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, therapeutic use, Female, Health Status, Health Surveys, Heart Failure, drug therapy, Hernia, Inguinal, surgery, Humans, Laparoscopy, standards, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Positive-Pressure Respiration, Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, therapy

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The SF-36 is a generic health status measure which has gained popularity as a measure of outcome in a wide variety of patient groups and social surveys. However, there is a need for even shorter measures, which reduce respondent burden. The developers of the SF-36 have consequently suggested that a 12-item sub-set of the items may accurately reproduce the two summary component scores which can be derived from the SF-36 [the Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) and Mental Health Component Summary Score (MCS)]. In this paper, we adopt scoring algorithms for the UK SF-36 and SF-12 summary scores to evaluate the picture of change gained in various treatment groups. The SF-36 was administered in three treatment groups (ACE inhibitors for congestive heart failure, continuous positive airways therapy for sleep apnoea, and open vs laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia). PCS and MCS scores calculated from the SF-36 or a sub-set of 12 items (the 'SF-12') were virtually identical, and indicated the same magnitude of ill-health and degree of change over time. The results suggest that where two summary scores of health status are adequate than the SF-12 may be the instrument of choice.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article