6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Sex and Gender in Neurodegenerative Diseases

      Submit here before September 30, 2024

      About Neurodegenerative Diseases: 3.0 Impact Factor I 4.3 CiteScore I 0.695 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Cognitive Predictors of Donepezil Therapy Response in Alzheimer Disease

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives: To examine whether the presence of domain-specific cognitive impairments would predict a response to donepezil medication in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease (AD). Methods: The protocol was an open-label study of 30 AD subjects (mean age 74 years; education 11 years; Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) 23 of 30) beginning a 6-month course of treatment with donepezil. Global response to treatment was determined using a combination algorithm based on changes over 6 months in the ADAS-cog, MMSE and CIBIC. In addition, a set of neuropsychological and experimental cognitive tests designed to test five domains of cognition were administered before beginning therapy in order to determine which domain of testing would be predictive to response to treatment. The tests examined attention, short-term and working memory, learning and memory, visuo-spatial motor skills, and lexical-semantic knowledge. Results: Eighteen of the thirty subjects were rated as having responded (stable or improved scores on the combination algorithm) to the therapy. Responders were significantly less impaired prior to treatment on the following tests: the Clock Drawing Test, a Visual-Spatial Motor Tracking Test, and the Boston Picture Naming Test. No significant initial group differences were noted on the other neuropsychological or experimental cognitive measures. Conclusion: The tests that most reliably predicted response to donepezil in AD subjects were in the domains of visual-spatial motor abilities and lexical-semantic functioning.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Alzheimer's disease and senile dementia: loss of neurons in the basal forebrain

          Recent evidence indicates that the nucleus basalis of Meynert, a distinct population of basal forebrain neurons, is a major source of cholinergic innervation of the cerebral cortex. Postmortem studies have previously demonstrated profound reduction in the presynaptic markers for cholinergic neurons in the cortex of patients with Alzheimer's disease and senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type. The results of this study show that neurons of the nucleus basalis of Meynert undergo a profound (greater than 75 percent) and selective degeneration in these patients and provide a pathological substrate of the cholinergic deficiency in their brains. Demonstration of selective degeneration of such neurons represents the first documentation of a loss of a transmitter-specific neuronal population in a major disorder of higher cortical function and, as such, points to a critical subcortical lesion in Alzheimer's patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory

            John Brown (1958)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Apolipoprotein E4 allele as a predictor of cholinergic deficits and treatment outcome in Alzheimer disease.

              Apolipoprotein E (apoE) is critical in the modulation of cholesterol and phospholipid transport between cells of different types. Human apoE is a polymorphic protein with three common alleles, APO epsilon 2, APO epsilon 3, and APO epsilon 4. ApoE4 is associated with sporadic and late-onset familial Alzheimer disease (AD). Gene dose was shown to have an effect on risk of developing AD, age of onset, accumulation of senile plaques in the brain, and reduction of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) activity in the hippocampus of AD subjects. To characterize the possible impact of the apoE4 allele on cholinergic markers in AD, we examined the effect of apoE4 allele copy number on pre- and postsynaptic markers of cholinergic activity. ApoE4 allele copy number showed an inverse relationship with residual brain ChAT activity and nicotinic receptor binding sites in both the hippocampal formation and the temporal cortex of AD subjects. AD cases lacking the apoE4 allele showed ChAT activities close or within age-matched normal control values. The effect of the apoE4 allele on cholinomimetic drug responsiveness was assessed next in a group (n = 40) of AD patients who completed a double-blind, 30-week clinical trial of the cholinesterase inhibitor tacrine. Results showed that > 80% of apoE4-negative AD patients showed marked improvement after 30 weeks as measured by the AD assessment scale (ADAS), whereas 60% of apoE4 carriers had ADAS scores that were worse compared to baseline. These results strongly support the concept that apoE4 plays a crucial role in the cholinergic dysfunction associated with AD and may be a prognostic indicator of poor response to therapy with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in AD patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                DEM
                Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord
                10.1159/issn.1420-8008
                Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
                S. Karger AG
                1420-8008
                1421-9824
                2007
                June 2007
                10 May 2007
                : 24
                : 1
                : 28-35
                Affiliations
                aBloomfield Centre for Research in Aging and Lady Davis Institute, McGill University, and bCentre de Recherche, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, Que., cDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto Ont., dDepartment of Psychology, Concordia University, eDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences and the Division of Geriatric Medicine, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, and fDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Que., Canada
                Article
                102569 Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2007;24:28–35
                10.1159/000102569
                17495473
                bd468238-95f0-4bf0-8e41-c7582e026e63
                © 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 28 February 2006
                Page count
                Tables: 2, References: 44, Pages: 8
                Categories
                Original Research Article

                Geriatric medicine,Neurology,Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurosciences,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry,Public health
                Donepezil,Alzheimer’s Disease,Treatment outcome

                Comments

                Comment on this article