21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Sexual double standards: a review and methodological critique of two decades of research.

      1 ,
      Journal of sex research
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A review of 30 studies published since 1980 found evidence for the continued existence of sexual double standards: different standards of sexual permissiveness for women and men. Experimental studies have included predominantly White North American college students; ethnographies, focus group and interview studies, and linguistic analyses have included more diverse samples. Studies show that sexual double standards are influenced by situational and interpersonal factors (e.g., the target's age, level of relationship commitment, and number of partners), and that double standards are local constructions, differing across ethnic and cultural groups. This review discusses methodological issues, including the strengths and limitations of quantitative and qualitative approaches. It also discusses implications for women s high-risk sexual behavior and sexual identity, and suggests directions for future research.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Sex Res
          Journal of sex research
          Informa UK Limited
          0022-4499
          0022-4499
          Feb 2003
          : 40
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Psychology, 406 Babbidge Road, U-20, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-1020, USA. mary.crawford@uconn.edu.
          Article
          10.1080/00224490309552163
          12806528
          bd6f2e71-294a-4c2f-8b4b-630059893f26

          Comments

          Comment on this article