5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Colonoscopy with polypectomy is associated with a low rate of complications in patients with cirrhosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and study aims: Cirrhotic patients are at a theoretically increased risk of bleeding. The safety of polypectomy in cirrhosis is poorly defined.

          Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with cirrhosis who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy at a tertiary-care hospital. Patient characteristics and polyp data were collected. Development of complications including immediate bleeding, delayed bleeding, hospitalization, blood transfusion, perforation, and death were recorded to 30-day follow-up. Clinical characteristics between bleeders and non-bleeders were compared, and predictors of bleeding were determined.

          Results: A total of 307 colonoscopies with 638 polypectomies were identified. Immediate bleeding occurred in 7.5 % (95 % CI 4.6 % – 10.4 %) and delayed bleeding occurred in 0.3 % (95 % CI 0.0 % – 0.9 %) of colonoscopies. All cases of immediate bleeding were controlled endoscopically and none resulted in serious complication. The rate of hospitalization was 0.7 % (95 % CI 0.0 % – 1.6 %) and repeat colonoscopy 0.3 % (95 % CI 0.0 % – 0.9 %); no cases of perforation, blood transfusion, or death occurred. Lower platelet count, higher INR, presence of ascites, and presence of esophageal varices were associated with increased risk of bleeding. Use of electrocautery was associated with a lower risk of immediate bleeding. There was no significant difference between bleeding and non-bleeding polyps with regard to size, morphology, and histology.

          Conclusions: Colonoscopy with polypectomy appears safe in patients with cirrhosis. There is a low risk of major complications. The risk of immediate bleeding appears higher than an average risk population; however, most bleeding is self-limited or can be controlled endoscopically. Bleeding tends to occur with more advanced liver disease. Both the sequelae of portal hypertension and coagulation abnormalities are predictive of bleeding.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected].

          This document is the first update of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations since 2000. The CRC screening tests are now grouped into cancer prevention tests and cancer detection tests. Colonoscopy every 10 years, beginning at age 50, remains the preferred CRC screening strategy. It is recognized that colonoscopy is not available in every clinical setting because of economic limitations. It is also realized that not all eligible persons are willing to undergo colonoscopy for screening purposes. In these cases, patients should be offered an alternative CRC prevention test (flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5-10 years, or a computed tomography (CT) colonography every 5 years) or a cancer detection test (fecal immunochemical test for blood, FIT).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice.

            The most widely quoted complication rates for colonoscopy are from case series performed by expert endoscopists. Our objectives were to evaluate the rates of bleeding, perforation, and death associated with outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in a population-based study. We identified all individuals 50 to 75 years old who underwent an outpatient colonoscopy during April 1, 2002, to March 31, 2003, in British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, and Nova Scotia, Canada. Using administrative data, we identified all individuals who were admitted to hospital with bleeding or perforation within 30 days following the colonoscopy in each province. We calculated the pooled rates of bleeding and perforation from the 4 provinces. In Ontario, we abstracted the hospital charts of all deaths that occurred within 30 days following the procedure. We used generalized estimating equations models to evaluate factors associated with bleeding and perforation. We identified 97,091 persons who had an outpatient colonoscopy. The pooled rates of colonoscopy-related bleeding and perforation were 1.64/1000 and 0.85/1000, respectively. The death rate was 0.074/1000 or approximately 1/14,000. Older age, male sex, having a polypectomy, and having the colonoscopy performed by a low-volume endoscopist were associated with increased odds of bleeding or perforation. Although colonoscopy has established benefits for the detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, the procedure is associated with risks of serious complications, including death. Older age, male sex, having a polypectomy, and having the procedure done by a low-volume endoscopist were independently associated with colonoscopy-related bleeding and perforation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Endosc Int Open
                Endosc Int Open
                10.1055/s-00025476
                Endoscopy International Open
                © Georg Thieme Verlag KG (Stuttgart · New York )
                2364-3722
                2196-9736
                September 2016
                08 August 2016
                : 4
                : 9
                : E947-E952
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
                [2 ]Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
                [3 ]Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX
                [4 ]Gastroenterology Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author Robert J. Huang, MD Alway Building, Room M211 300 Pasteur Drive, MC: 5187Stanford, CA 94305-5187 rjhuang@ 123456stanford.edu
                Article
                10.1055/s-0042-111317
                5025305
                bd828b7b-bf8c-48d7-860a-0250ad6d1b06
                © Thieme Medical Publishers
                History
                : 04 December 2015
                : 23 June 2016
                Categories
                Original article

                Comments

                Comment on this article