9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prospective and randomized study to evaluate the clinical impact of cap assisted colonoscopy (CAC).

      Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie
      Colonic Polyps, pathology, Colonoscopes, Colonoscopy, instrumentation, methods, Colorectal Neoplasms, Equipment Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Female, Humans, Image Enhancement, Male, Middle Aged, Observer Variation, Prospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although colonoscopy is the standard procedure in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia, a significant number of clinical relevant lesions may be missed even by experienced endoscopists using current technology. A transparent cap mounted at the tip of a colonoscope may be an easy way to extend the visual field during colonoscopy and may improve the detection rate of mucosal lesions. The significance of cap assisted (CAC) vs. conventional colonoscopy (CC) on polyp detection rate was evaluated in a prospective randomized controlled trial in 504 patients. CC and CAC detected polyps in 39.3 % and 31.8, not significantly different. There was also no significant difference between CAC and CC according to age, sex, indication for colonoscopy, diverticulosis, sedation, bowel cleansing, withdrawal time, time/number of attempts to intubate the cecal walve, number, localization, size or histology of polyps,. However, the time to reach the cecal floor and the overall time of colonoscopy were significantly lower for CAC (1 minute). CAC was without clinical impact on polyp detection rate or performance of colonoscopy. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article