3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pulmonary vein encirclement using an Ablation Index-guided point-by-point workflow: cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of left atrial scar formation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims 

          A point-by-point workflow for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) targeting pre-defined Ablation Index values (a composite of contact force, time, and power) and minimizing interlesion distance may optimize the creation of contiguous ablation lesions whilst minimizing scar formation. We aimed to compare ablation scar formation in patients undergoing PVI using this workflow to patients undergoing a continuous catheter drag workflow.

          Methods and results

          Post-ablation cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging was performed in patients undergoing 1st-time PVI using a parameter-guided point-by-point workflow ( n = 26). Total left atrial scar burden and the width and continuity of the pulmonary vein encirclement were determined on analysis of atrial late gadolinium enhancement sequences. Comparison was made with a cohort of patients ( n = 20) undergoing PVI using continuous drag lesions. Mean post-ablation scar burden and scar width were significantly lower in the point-by-point group than in the control group (6.6 ± 6.8% vs. 9.6 ± 5.0%, P = 0.03 and 7.9 ± 3.6 mm vs. 10.7 ± 2.3 mm, P = 0.003). More complete bilateral pulmonary vein encirclements were seen in the point-by-point group ( P = 0.038). All patients achieved acute PVI.

          Conclusion

          Pulmonary vein isolation using a point-by-point workflow is feasible and results in a lower scar burden and scar width with more complete pulmonary vein encirclements than a conventional drag lesion approach.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study.

          Pulmonary vein isolation is the most prevalent approach for catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Long-term success of the procedure is diminished by arrhythmia recurrences occurring predominantly because of reconnections in previously isolated pulmonary veins. The aim of the EFFICAS I multicenter study was to demonstrate the correlation between contact force (CF) parameters during initial procedure and the incidence of isolation gaps (gap) at 3-month follow-up.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ablation index, a novel marker of ablation lesion quality: prediction of pulmonary vein reconnection at repeat electrophysiology study and regional differences in target values.

            Force-Time Integral (FTI) is commonly used as a marker of ablation lesion quality during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), but does not incorporate power. Ablation Index (AI) is a novel lesion quality marker that utilizes contact force, time, and power in a weighted formula. Furthermore, only a single FTI target value has been suggested despite regional variation in left atrial wall thickness. We aimed to study AI's and FTI's relationships with PV reconnection at repeat electrophysiology study, and regional threshold values that predicted no reconnection.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Improving procedural and one-year outcome after contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation: the role of interlesion distance, ablation index, and contact force variability in the ‘CLOSE’-protocol

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Europace
                Europace
                europace
                Europace
                Oxford University Press
                1099-5129
                1532-2092
                December 2019
                05 September 2019
                05 September 2019
                : 21
                : 12
                : 1817-1823
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London , 4th Floor North Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
                [2 ] Department of Cardiology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust , London SE1 7EH, UK
                Author notes
                Corresponding author. E-mail address: louisa.oneill@ 123456kcl.ac.uk
                Article
                euz226
                10.1093/europace/euz226
                6887923
                31793653
                bde21f98-952f-469f-bc5c-8329e66e9935
                © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 April 2019
                : 24 July 2019
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Funding
                Funded by: British Heart Foundation 10.13039/501100000274
                Award ID: PG/13/37/30280
                Funded by: Wellcome and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council for Medical Engineering at King's College London
                Award ID: WT 203148/Z/16/Z
                Funded by: National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's
                Funded by: NHS Foundation Trust
                Funded by: King's College London
                Funded by: British Heart Foundation Clinical Research Training Fellowship
                Award ID: FS/18/27/33543
                Funded by: Medical Research Council 10.13039/501100000265
                Funded by: Clinical Research Training Fellowship
                Award ID: MR/N001877/1
                Categories
                Clinical Research
                Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                pulmonary vein isolation,ablation index,point-by-point ablation,cardiac magnetic resonance imaging,atrial ablation scar

                Comments

                Comment on this article