17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What do we really know about age-related stereotypes and well-being of older adults? A commentary on the state of the art

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is a considerable body of literature on harmful consequences of age-related stereotypes—including consequences on physical and mental health. However, this commentary critically argues that the current state of the art disregards consequences of these stereotypes specifically for the well-being of older adults (i.e., outcome that is not to be confounded with mental health). To this end, the content of age-related stereotypes and the mechanisms through which they operate on physical and mental health are first outlined. The commentary then focuses on the very scarce evidence documenting how and when the well-being of older adults (as assessed directly and not as inferred from other indicators) is influenced by self-directed stereotypes. After setting out possible ways well-being may be involved in the relationship between self-directed stereotypes and physical and mental health of older adults, the present commentary argues that a better understanding of well-being would benefit strategies targeting the reduction of age-related stereotypes. Overall, this commentary on the state of the art highlights that future research is still needed to better understand both the direct and indirect relationships between age-related stereotypes and well-being that is not reducible to positive experiences of life (or hedonic well-being) but also comprises an eudaimonic component.

          Related collections

          Most cited references107

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The structure of psychological well-being revisited.

          A theoretical model of psychological well-being that encompasses 6 distinct dimensions of wellness (Autonomy, Environmental Mastery, Personal Growth, Positive Relations with Others, Purpose in Life, Self-Acceptance) was tested with data from a nationally representative sample of adults (N = 1,108), aged 25 and older, who participated in telephone interviews. Confirmatory factor analyses provided support for the proposed 6-factor model, with a single second-order super factor. The model was superior in fit over single-factor and other artifactual models. Age and sex differences on the various well-being dimensions replicated prior findings. Comparisons with other frequently used indicators (positive and negative affect, life satisfaction) demonstrated that the latter neglect key aspects of positive functioning emphasized in theories of health and well-being.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.

              Currently, there is massive production of unnecessary, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Instead of promoting evidence-based medicine and health care, these instruments often serve mostly as easily produced publishable units or marketing tools. Suboptimal systematic reviews and meta-analyses can be harmful given the major prestige and influence these types of studies have acquired. The publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses should be realigned to remove biases and vested interests and to integrate them better with the primary production of evidence.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2602614/overviewRole: Role:
                Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/636521/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                13 May 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 1358403
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Univ Rennes, Université Rennes 2, LP3C (Laboratoire de Psychologie: Cognition, Comportement, Communication)-UR1285 , Rennes, France
                [2] 2Laboratoire de Psychologie de Caen Normandie (LPCN UR7452), Psychology Department, Université de Caen Normandie , Caen, France
                [3] 3Centre de Recherche sur les Fonctionnements et Dysfonctionnements Psychologiques (CRFDP UR7475), Université de Rouen Normandie , Rouen, France
                Author notes

                Edited by: Georgios Abakoumkin, University of Thessaly, Greece

                Reviewed by: Nanna Notthoff, Leipzig University, Germany

                Werner Greve, University of Hildesheim, Germany

                *Correspondence: Pauline Rasset, pauline.rasset@ 123456univ-rennes2.fr
                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1358403
                11130559
                38807961
                bdf15f99-599e-441e-8a1c-b8e867dd3c7e
                Copyright © 2024 Rasset, Mange and Augustinova.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 19 December 2023
                : 24 April 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 113, Pages: 10, Words: 9354
                Funding
                Funded by: Région Normandie
                Award ID: 19E00851
                The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The work reported was supported by ANR-19-CE28-0013 Grant from Agence Nationale de la Recherche and RIN Tremplin Grant 19E00851 from Normandie Region.
                Categories
                Psychology
                Review
                Custom metadata
                Personality and Social Psychology

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                age-related stereotypes,self-directed stereotypes,stereotype threat,internalization of stereotypes,hedonic well-being,eudaimonic well-being

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log