35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Condiciones de trabajo del personal de salud que enfrenta la pandemia en Latinoamérica: revisión integrativa Translated title: Condições de trabalho dos profissionais de saúde frente à pandemia na América Latina: uma revisão integrativa Translated title: Working conditions of healthcare personnel facing the pandemic in Latin America: an integrative review

      review-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumen Introducción: El personal de salud es el más expuesto al contagio en su atención a pacientes con COVID-19. Conocer los estudios realizados acerca de las condiciones de trabajo del personal de salud en latino américa, permitirá detectar las líneas de investigación necesarias y menos tratadas, deficiencias y trazar líneas de trabajo para su solución. Objetivo: Determinar mediante revisión integrativa de literatura, las condiciones en que se desarrolla el trabajo del personal de salud que enfrentó la pandemia en la región, sus consecuencias y el comportamiento de los actores responsables. Metodología: Revisión integrativa aplicando método Ganong, mediante pares de palabras clave. Los documentos se clasificaron por categorías de estudio: condiciones de trabajo, consecuencias para la salud de condiciones inadecuadas y el papel de los actores responsables de garantizar condiciones de trabajo satisfactorias. Se seleccionaron 12 artículos originales y de revisión que aportaron datos cuantitativos de investigaciones realizadas con personal de salud de la región. Fueron excluidas publicaciones duplicadas, reflexiones, cartas y otros artículos que no aportaron elementos de fundamentación. Resultados: Muestran altos porcentajes de déficit de equipos de protección personal, condiciones de trabajo extremas que provocaron contagio, falta de medidas de bioseguridad, capacitación insuficiente, se violaron derechos laborales y de seguridad social por los actores responsables de garantizarlos. Conclusiones: Las condiciones de trabajo fueron inadecuadas e inseguras. Se produjeron, afectaciones físicas, psicológicas y económicas al personal de salud, lo que demanda que los gobiernos e instituciones de salud cumplan el papel que les corresponde para su solución.

          Translated abstract

          Abstrato Introdução: Os profissionais de saúde são os mais expostos à infecção enquanto cuidam dos pacientes com COVID-19. Conhecer os estudos realizados sobre as condições de trabalho dos profissionais de saúde na América Latina permitirá detectar as linhas de pesquisa necessárias e menos tratadas, deficiências e traçar as principais linhas de trabalho para sua solução. Objetivo: Determinar, por meio de uma revisão integrativa da literatura, as condições de trabalho dos profissionais de saúde que enfrentaram a pandemia na região, suas consequências e o comportamento dos atores responsáveis. Metodologia: Revisão integrativa aplicando o método Ganong, por meio de pares de palavras-chave. Os documentos foram classificados por categorias de estudo como condições de trabalho, consequências para a saúde de condições inadequadas e o papel dos atores responsáveis por garantir condições de trabalho satisfatórias. Foram selecionados 12 artigos originais e de revisão, que forneceram dados quantitativos de pesquisas realizadas com profissionais de saúde da região. Foram excluídas publicações duplicadas, reflexões, cartas e outros artigos que não trouxessem elementos de fundamentação. Resultados: Os resultados mostram altos percentuais de déficit de equipamentos de proteção individual, condições extremas de trabalho que causaram infecção, falta de medidas de biossegurança, treinamento insuficiente, direitos trabalhistas e previdenciários foram violados pelos atores responsáveis por garanti-los. Conclusões: As condições de trabalho eram inadequadas e inseguras. Os profissionais de saúde foram afetados física, psicológica e economicamente, exigindo, assim, que governos e instituições de saúde desempenhem um papel na sua solução.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract Introduction: Healthcare personnel are the most exposed to infection while they care for the patients with COVID-19. Knowing the studies carried out with respect to the working conditions of the healthcare personnel in Latin America, will enable the detection of the necessary and less treated lines of research, deficiencies and to trace the main lines of work for their solution. Objective: To determine, by means of an integrative literature review, the working conditions of healthcare personnel who faced the pandemic in the region, its consequences and the behavior of the responsible stakeholders. Methodology: Integrative review applying the Ganong method, by means of pairs of key words. The documents were classified by categories of study such as working conditions, health consequences of inadequate conditions and the role of the stakeholders responsible for ensuring satisfactory working conditions. Twelve original and review articles were selected, which provided quantitative data from research carried out with healthcare personnel in the region. Duplicate publications, reflections, letters and other articles that did not provide elements of substantiation were excluded. Results: Results show high percentages of deficit of personal protection equipment, extreme working conditions that caused infection, lack of biosecurity measures, insufficient training, labor and social security rights were violated by the stakeholders responsible for guaranteeing them. Conclusions: Working conditions were inadequate and unsafe. Healthcare personnel were affected physically, psychologically and economically, thus, demanding governments and health institutions to play a role in their solution.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Integrative reviews of nursing research.

          Integrative reviews of research are a valuable part of the process of creating and organizing a body of literature. It has been argued that integrative reviews should be held to the same standards of clarity, rigor, and replication as primary research. In this paper methods for conducting an integrative review are discussed. Seventeen reviews from nursing journals were examined and compared with a proposed set of criteria for reviews. The results indicated that the majority of integrative reviews in nursing fell short of primary research standards. Guidelines for conducting more rigorous reviews are presented.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Personal Safety during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Realities and Perspectives of Healthcare Workers in Latin America †

            Healthcare workers exposed to coronavirus (COVID-19) may not have adequate access to personal protective equipment (PPE), safety procedures, and diagnostic protocols. Our objective was to evaluate the reality and perceptions about personal safety among healthcare workers in Latin America. This is a cross-sectional, online survey-based study administered to 936 healthcare professionals in Latin America from 31 March 2020 to 4 April 2020. A 12-item structured questionnaire was developed. A total of 936 healthcare workers completed the online survey. Of them, 899 (95.1%) were physicians, 28 (2.9%) were nurses, and 18 (1.9%) were allied health professionals. Access to protective equipment was as follows: gel hand sanitizer (n = 889; 95%), disposable gloves (n = 853; 91.1%), disposable gowns (n = 630; 67.3%), disposable surgical masks (785; 83.9%), N95 masks (n = 516; 56.1%), and facial protective shields (n = 305; 32.6%). The vast majority (n = 707; 75.5%) had access to personal safety policies and procedures, and 699 (74.7%) participants had access to diagnostic algorithms. On a 1-to-10 Likert scale, the participants expressed limited human resources support (4.92 ± 0.2; mean ± SD), physical integrity protection in the workplace (5.5 ± 0.1; mean ± SD), and support from public health authorities (5.01 ± 0.12; mean ± SD). Healthcare workers in Latin America had limited access to essential PPE and support from healthcare authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Estrés laboral, ansiedad y miedo al COVID-19 en médicos generales colombianos

              Introducción. Las epidemias pueden generar angustia en la población general y en los profesionales de la salud, y la pandemia causada por el virus del COVID-19 no es la excepción. El objetivo del presente estudio es determinar la presencia de síntomas de estrés laboral, ansiedad y miedo al COVID-19 en médicos generales, además de estimar la asociación según el ente territorial donde trabajaban. Metodología. Este es un estudio transversal que exploró síntomas y percepciones durante la pandemia del COVID-19 en médicos generales colombianos sometidos a cuarentena obligatoria que ejercieron su profesión en marzo del 2020. Previo consentimiento informado, anónima y voluntariamente, los participantes diligenciaron un formulario virtual con preguntas generales sobre COVID-19. El cuestionario buscaba encontrar problemas psicosomáticos sirviéndose de la Escala para el Trastorno de Ansiedad Generalizada (GAD-7, por sus siglas en inglés) y el FCV-19S (Fear of COVID-19). Los participantes se clasificaron en Municipio no capital o Municipio capital según el ente territorial en donde laboraban. Regresión logística entre el ente territorial (que acá es tomada como variable independiente) con los síntomas de ansiedad, estrés laboral y miedo al COVID-19 (que en este caso es tomado como variable dependiente). Resultados: Participaron 531 médicos generales con edad promedio de 30 años. El 73.3% laboraban en Municipio capital. Un tercio de los encuestados presentó estrés laboral leve, mientras que el 6% presentó estrés laboral alto o severo, esto sin diferencias entre los grupos (p<0.05). Se identificaron síntomas de ansiedad en el 72.9%, más frecuente entre quienes laboraban en las capitales (p=0.044). El 37.1% presentó síntomas de miedo al COVID-19 (FCV-19S). No se observó asociación en la regresión logística realizada. Discusión: Factores psicosociales y psicosomáticos asociados al miedo son el común denominador de los síntomas de ansiedad y estrés laboral en las pandemias. Conclusión: Siete de cada diez participantes presentó síntomas de ansiedad o estrés laboral, mientras que cuatro presentaron síntomas de FCV-19S. No se observó asociación con la clasificación del municipio donde laboraban.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                sanus
                Sanus
                Sanus
                Universidad de Sonora, División de Ciencias Biológicas y de la Salud, Departamento de enfermería (Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico )
                2448-6094
                December 2022
                : 7
                : e311
                Affiliations
                [1] Quito orgnameUniversidad Central del Ecuador Ecuador
                Article
                S2448-60942022000100111 S2448-6094(22)00700000111
                10.36789/revsanus.vi1.311
                be07a168-a68d-4b5e-8619-8224c5eb389b

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 27 July 2021
                : 26 May 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 34, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Mexico

                Categories
                Revisión

                Public health policies (DeCS),Personal protection equipment,COVID-19,Occupational hazards,Occupational health,Políticas públicas de salud (DeCS),Equipo de protección personal,Riesgos laborales,Salud ocupacional,Políticas publicas de saúde (DeCS),Equipamento de proteção pessoal,Riscos ocupacionais,Saúde ocupacional

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log