6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Long term effects of Chernobyl contamination on DNA repair function and plant resistance to different biotic and abiotic stress factors

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references93

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Transgeneration memory of stress in plants.

          Owing to their sessile nature, plants are constantly exposed to a multitude of environmental stresses to which they react with a battery of responses. The result is plant tolerance to conditions such as excessive or inadequate light, water, salt and temperature, and resistance to pathogens. Not only is plant physiology known to change under abiotic or biotic stress, but changes in the genome have also been identified. However, it was not determined whether plants from successive generations of the original, stressed plants inherited the capacity for genomic change. Here we show that in Arabidopsis thaliana plants treated with short-wavelength radiation (ultraviolet-C) or flagellin (an elicitor of plant defences), somatic homologous recombination of a transgenic reporter is increased in the treated population and these increased levels of homologous recombination persist in the subsequent, untreated generations. The epigenetic trait of enhanced homologous recombination could be transmitted through both the maternal and the paternal crossing partner, and proved to be dominant. The increase of the hyper-recombination state in generations subsequent to the treated generation was independent of the presence of the transgenic allele (the recombination substrate under consideration) in the treated plant. We conclude that environmental factors lead to increased genomic flexibility even in successive, untreated generations, and may increase the potential for adaptation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            ATR and ATM play both distinct and additive roles in response to ionizing radiation.

            The ATR and ATM protein kinases are known to be involved in a wide variety of responses to DNA damage. The Arabidopsis thaliana genome includes both ATR and ATM orthologs, and plants with null alleles of these genes are viable. Arabidopsis atr and atm mutants display hypersensitivity to gamma-irradiation. To further characterize the roles of ATM and ATR in response to ionizing radiation, we performed a short-term global transcription analysis in wild-type and mutant lines. We found that hundreds of genes are upregulated in response to gamma-irradiation, and that the induction of virtually all of these genes is dependent on ATM, but not ATR. The transcript of CYCB1;1 is unique among the cyclin transcripts in being rapidly and powerfully upregulated in response to ionizing radiation, while other G(2)-associated transcripts are suppressed. We found that both ATM and ATR contribute to the induction of a CYCB1;1:GUS fusion by IR, but only ATR is required for the persistence of this response. We propose that this upregulation of CYCB1;1 does not reflect the accumulation of cells in G(2), but instead reflects a still unknown role for this cyclin in DNA damage response.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The interacting pathways for prevention and repair of oxidative DNA damage.

              Genomes are damaged by spontaneous decay, chemicals, radiation and replication errors. DNA damage may cause mutations resulting in inheritable disease, cancer and ageing. Oxidative stress from ionising radiation and oxidative metabolism causes base damage, as well as strand breaks in DNA. Base damage is mostly indirect and caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated, e.g. O2(.-) (superoxide radical), OH. (hydroxyl radical) and H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide). ROS also oxidise RNA, lipids, proteins and nucleotides. The first line of defence against ROS is enzymatic inactivation of superoxide by superoxide dismutase and inactivation of the less toxic hydrogen peroxide by catalase. As a second line of defence, incorporation of damaged bases into DNA is prevented by enzymes that hydrolyse oxidised dNTPs (e.g. 8-oxodGTP) to the corresponding dNMP. The third line of defence is repair of oxidative damage in DNA by an intricate network of DNA repair mechanisms. Base excision repair (BER), transcription-coupled repair (TCR), global genome repair (GGR), mismatch repair (MMR), translesion synthesis (TLS), homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) all contribute to repair of oxidative DNA damage. These mechanisms are also integrated with other cellular processes such as cell cycle regulation, transcription and replication and even use some common proteins. BER is the major pathway for repair of oxidative base damage, with TCR and MMR being important backup pathways for repair of transcribed strands and newly replicated strands, respectively. In recent years, several new DNA glycosylases that initiate BER of oxidative damage have been identified. These have specificities overlapping with previously known DNA glycosylases and serve as backups, and may have distinct roles as well. Thus, there is both inter- and intra-pathway complementation in repair of oxidative base damage, explaining the limited effects of absence of single DNA glycosylases in animal model systems.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cytology and Genetics
                Cytol. Genet.
                Allerton Press
                0095-4527
                1934-9440
                November 2016
                November 24 2016
                November 2016
                : 50
                : 6
                : 381-399
                Article
                10.3103/S0095452716060049
                be0da2db-69ff-4480-bb77-efe20bb4807c
                © 2016

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article