25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Anchored Design of Protein-Protein Interfaces

      research-article
      , *
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Few existing protein-protein interface design methods allow for extensive backbone rearrangements during the design process. There is also a dichotomy between redesign methods, which take advantage of the native interface, and de novo methods, which produce novel binders.

          Methodology

          Here, we propose a new method for designing novel protein reagents that combines advantages of redesign and de novo methods and allows for extensive backbone motion. This method requires a bound structure of a target and one of its natural binding partners. A key interaction in this interface, the anchor, is computationally grafted out of the partner and into a surface loop on the design scaffold. The design scaffold's surface is then redesigned with backbone flexibility to create a new binding partner for the target. Careful choice of a scaffold will bring experimentally desirable characteristics into the new complex. The use of an anchor both expedites the design process and ensures that binding proceeds against a known location on the target. The use of surface loops on the scaffold allows for flexible-backbone redesign to properly search conformational space.

          Conclusions and Significance

          This protocol was implemented within the Rosetta3 software suite. To demonstrate and evaluate this protocol, we have developed a benchmarking set of structures from the PDB with loop-mediated interfaces. This protocol can recover the correct loop-mediated interface in 15 out of 16 tested structures, using only a single residue as an anchor.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules.

          We have recently completed a full re-architecturing of the ROSETTA molecular modeling program, generalizing and expanding its existing functionality. The new architecture enables the rapid prototyping of novel protocols by providing easy-to-use interfaces to powerful tools for molecular modeling. The source code of this rearchitecturing has been released as ROSETTA3 and is freely available for academic use. At the time of its release, it contained 470,000 lines of code. Counting currently unpublished protocols at the time of this writing, the source includes 1,285,000 lines. Its rapid growth is a testament to its ease of use. This chapter describes the requirements for our new architecture, justifies the design decisions, sketches out central classes, and highlights a few of the common tasks that the new software can perform. © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Protein structure prediction using Rosetta.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites.

              The non-covalent assembly of proteins that fold separately is central to many biological processes, and differs from the permanent macromolecular assembly of protein subunits in oligomeric proteins. We performed an analysis of the atomic structure of the recognition sites seen in 75 protein-protein complexes of known three-dimensional structure: 24 protease-inhibitor, 19 antibody-antigen and 32 other complexes, including nine enzyme-inhibitor and 11 that are involved in signal transduction.The size of the recognition site is related to the conformational changes that occur upon association. Of the 75 complexes, 52 have "standard-size" interfaces in which the total area buried by the components in the recognition site is 1600 (+/-400) A2. In these complexes, association involves only small changes of conformation. Twenty complexes have "large" interfaces burying 2000 to 4660 A2, and large conformational changes are seen to occur in those cases where we can compare the structure of complexed and free components. The average interface has approximately the same non-polar character as the protein surface as a whole, and carries somewhat fewer charged groups. However, some interfaces are significantly more polar and others more non-polar than the average. Of the atoms that lose accessibility upon association, half make contacts across the interface and one-third become fully inaccessible to the solvent. In the latter case, the Voronoi volume was calculated and compared with that of atoms buried inside proteins. The ratio of the two volumes was 1.01 (+/-0.03) in all but 11 complexes, which shows that atoms buried at protein-protein interfaces are close-packed like the protein interior. This conclusion could be extended to the majority of interface atoms by including solvent positions determined in high-resolution X-ray structures in the calculation of Voronoi volumes. Thus, water molecules contribute to the close-packing of atoms that insure complementarity between the two protein surfaces, as well as providing polar interactions between the two proteins. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2011
                17 June 2011
                : 6
                : 6
                : e20872
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
                University of South Florida, United States of America
                Author notes

                Conceived and designed the experiments: SML BAK. Performed the experiments: SML. Analyzed the data: SML BAK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SML. Wrote the paper: SML BAK.

                Article
                PONE-D-11-03259
                10.1371/journal.pone.0020872
                3117852
                21698112
                be16c0be-cf5f-4203-b295-a504909e9b0d
                Lewis, Kuhlman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 2 February 2011
                : 11 May 2011
                Page count
                Pages: 14
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Biochemistry
                Biochemistry Simulations
                Biophysics
                Biophysics Simulations
                Computational Biology
                Macromolecular Structure Analysis
                Protein Structure
                Biochemical Simulations
                Biophysic Al Simulations
                Chemistry
                Computational Chemistry
                Molecular Mechanics

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article