13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      “The kids get haggled over”: how institutional practices contribute to segregation in elementary schools

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          School segregation is a key topic in urban, educational and inequality research. While previous studies have mainly focused on the effects of both parental school choice and residential segregation patterns on the composition of schools, we draw attention to institutional players steering access to elementary schools as one important dimension of institutional discrimination. Combining expert interviews with school principals and the local schools department with a quantitative survey among parents, we scrutinize the interplay between institutional structures and practices and parental school choice strategies. We identify three dimensions of institutional discrimination as being particularly relevant for school access, and thus for school segregation and inequality: a school’s guidelines and strategic objectives in dealing with segregation, the enrollment process, and a school’s profiling and information policies. These factors prove to be rather subtle, yet crucial facets of institutional discrimination, co-producing and perpetuating spatial inequalities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references99

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines

          Evaluating the intercoder reliability (ICR) of a coding frame is frequently recommended as good practice in qualitative analysis. ICR is a somewhat controversial topic in the qualitative research community, with some arguing that it is an inappropriate or unnecessary step within the goals of qualitative analysis. Yet ICR assessment can yield numerous benefits for qualitative studies, which include improving the systematicity, communicability, and transparency of the coding process; promoting reflexivity and dialogue within research teams; and helping convince diverse audiences of the trustworthiness of the analysis. Few guidelines exist to help researchers negotiate the assessment of ICR in qualitative analysis. The current article explains what ICR is, reviews common arguments for and against its incorporation in qualitative analysis and offers guidance on the practical elements of performing an ICR assessment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Talk Is Cheap

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              School choice, social class and distinction: the realization of social advantage in education

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Sociol
                Front Sociol
                Front. Sociol.
                Frontiers in Sociology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-7775
                31 October 2023
                2023
                : 8
                : 1250158
                Affiliations
                [1] 1ILS – Research Institute for Regional and Urban Development, Research Group “Urban Social Space” , Dortmund, Germany
                [2] 2Institute of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Planning, Building, Environment, Technical University of Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Pieter-Paul Verhaeghe, Vrije University Brussels, Belgium

                Reviewed by: Peter Stevens, Ghent University, Belgium; Lore Van Praag, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands

                *Correspondence: Heike Hanhörster, h.hanhoerster@ 123456tu-berlin.de
                Article
                10.3389/fsoc.2023.1250158
                10644677
                be37b574-af24-4b76-ae7e-bc70da8998ef
                Copyright © 2023 Ramos Lobato, Goldbach and Hanhörster.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 29 June 2023
                : 03 October 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 79, Pages: 15, Words: 14098
                Funding
                This article is based on a three-year research project funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – 445595495.
                Categories
                Sociology
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Race and Ethnicity

                institutional discrimination,school segregation,school composition,institutional practices,school choice,educational inequality

                Comments

                Comment on this article