6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Open-Label Placebo Treatment: Outcome Expectations and General Acceptance in the Lay Population

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Most physicians sometimes apply therapies without specific active ingredients. Although patients seem to judge such placebo treatments as acceptable under certain circumstances, deception is still an ethical problem. Open-label placebos (OLPs) might be a promising approach to solve this dilemma. This study compared general acceptance and outcome expectations of OLPs and deceptive placebos (DPs).

          Methods

          In an experimental online study, 814 participants read a case vignette of a person with insomnia receiving a pill. The participants were then randomly allocated into two groups, where the second part of the vignette described the pill as either a deceptive placebo (DP group) or as an open-label placebo (OLP group). The Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) assessed outcome expectations after the first (pre-assessment) and the second (post-assessment) parts of the vignette. Treatment acceptance was measured at post-assessment. Data from 798 participants were analyzed by a mixed multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), t-tests, and post-hoc mediation analyses.

          Results

          The MANOVA revealed a significant group main effect and a significant time × group interaction effect. At post-assessment, outcome expectations were higher in the DP group than in the OLP group. Acceptance of the placebo treatment was also higher in the DP group than in the OLP group. Mediation analyses confirmed that higher acceptance in the DP group was mediated by higher expectations.

          Conclusions

          When laypersons read about placebo treatment, their outcome expectations toward DPs were higher than toward OLPs. Surprisingly, the application of DPs was rated as more acceptable than OLPs. This result might be explained by indirect effects of treatment expectations.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s12529-020-09933-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

          G*Power (Erdfelder, Faul, & Buchner, 1996) was designed as a general stand-alone power analysis program for statistical tests commonly used in social and behavioral research. G*Power 3 is a major extension of, and improvement over, the previous versions. It runs on widely used computer platforms (i.e., Windows XP, Windows Vista, and Mac OS X 10.4) and covers many different statistical tests of the t, F, and chi2 test families. In addition, it includes power analyses for z tests and some exact tests. G*Power 3 provides improved effect size calculators and graphic options, supports both distribution-based and design-based input modes, and offers all types of power analyses in which users might be interested. Like its predecessors, G*Power 3 is free.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The beliefs about medicines questionnaire: The development and evaluation of a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of medication

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                julia.wittkowski@uni-marburg.de
                Journal
                Int J Behav Med
                Int J Behav Med
                International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
                Springer US (New York )
                1070-5503
                1532-7558
                22 October 2020
                22 October 2020
                2021
                : 28
                : 4
                : 444-454
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.10253.35, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9756, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, , Philipps-University of Marburg, ; Marburg, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.440923.8, ISNI 0000 0001 1245 5350, Department of Clinical and Biological Psychology, , Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, ; Eichstätt, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6501-0221
                Article
                9933
                10.1007/s12529-020-09933-1
                8263407
                33094438
                be3cac9d-f632-42ef-911b-5fbcb4ce17cb
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 27 September 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft;
                Award ID: RI 574/22-1
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Philipps-Universität Marburg (1009)
                Categories
                Full Length Manuscript
                Custom metadata
                © International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2021

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                placebo,online experiments,vignette measure,attitude measurement

                Comments

                Comment on this article