10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Auditory spatial representations of the world are compressed in blind humans

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Compared to sighted listeners, blind listeners often display enhanced auditory spatial abilities such as localization in azimuth. However, less is known about whether blind humans can accurately judge distance in extrapersonal space using auditory cues alone. Using virtualization techniques, we show that auditory spatial representations of the world beyond the peripersonal space of blind listeners are compressed compared to those for normally sighted controls. Blind participants overestimated the distance to nearby sources and underestimated the distance to remote sound sources, in both reverberant and anechoic environments, and for speech, music, and noise signals. Functions relating judged and actual virtual distance were well fitted by compressive power functions, indicating that the absence of visual information regarding the distance of sound sources may prevent accurate calibration of the distance information provided by auditory signals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children.

          Linguistic guidelines for the design of sentences for speech audiometry with children are described, and new lists of test sentences which are based on such guidelines--the Bamford-Kowal-Bench Sentence Lists for Children--are introduced. Audiometric data relating to the use of the new lists are presented and discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness.

            Many current neurophysiological, psychophysical, and psychological approaches to vision rest on the idea that when we see, the brain produces an internal representation of the world. The activation of this internal representation is assumed to give rise to the experience of seeing. The problem with this kind of approach is that it leaves unexplained how the existence of such a detailed internal representation might produce visual consciousness. An alternative proposal is made here. We propose that seeing is a way of acting. It is a particular way of exploring the environment. Activity in internal representations does not generate the experience of seeing. The outside world serves as its own, external, representation. The experience of seeing occurs when the organism masters what we call the governing laws of sensorimotor contingency. The advantage of this approach is that it provides a natural and principled way of accounting for visual consciousness, and for the differences in the perceived quality of sensory experience in the different sensory modalities. Several lines of empirical evidence are brought forward in support of the theory, in particular: evidence from experiments in sensorimotor adaptation, visual "filling in," visual stability despite eye movements, change blindness, sensory substitution, and color perception.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects.

              Do blind persons develop capacities of their remaining senses that exceed those of sighted individuals? Besides anecdotal suggestions, two views based on experimental studies have been advanced. The first proposes that blind individuals should be severely impaired, given that vision is essential to develop spatial concepts. The second suggests that compensation occurs through the remaining senses, allowing them to develop an accurate concept of space. Here we investigate how an ecologically critical function, namely three-dimensional spatial mapping, is carried out by early-blind individuals with or without residual vision. Subjects were tested under monaural and binaural listening conditions. We find that early-blind subjects can map the auditory environment with equal or better accuracy than sighted subjects. Furthermore, unlike sighted subjects, they can correctly localize sounds monaurally. Surprisingly, blind individuals with residual peripheral vision localized sounds less precisely than sighted or totally blind subjects, confirming that compensation varies according to the aetiology and extent of blindness. Our results resolve a long-standing controversy in that they provide behavioural evidence that totally blind individuals have better auditory ability than sighted subjects, enabling them to compensate for their loss of vision.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                0845 196 2642 , ak771@cam.ac.uk , http://hearing.psychol.cam.ac.uk
                Journal
                Exp Brain Res
                Exp Brain Res
                Experimental Brain Research
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0014-4819
                1432-1106
                11 November 2016
                11 November 2016
                2017
                : 235
                : 2
                : 597-606
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000121885934, GRID grid.5335.0, Department of Psychology, , University of Cambridge, ; Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2299 5510, GRID grid.5115.0, Vision and Eye Research Unit (VERU), Postgraduate Medical Institute, , Anglia Ruskin University, ; YST 215, Young Street, Cambridge, CB1 1PT UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2161 2573, GRID grid.4464.2, Centre for the Study of the Senses, Institute of Philosophy, , University of London, ; Senate House, Malet Street, London, WC1E 7HU UK
                Article
                4823
                10.1007/s00221-016-4823-1
                5272902
                27837259
                be585303-cafd-4679-ab48-d0546025d537
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 8 June 2016
                : 5 November 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265, Medical Research Council;
                Award ID: G0701870
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

                Neurosciences
                blindness,spatial hearing,auditory distance,multisensory plasticity,sound localization

                Comments

                Comment on this article