27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Exoplanet Biosignatures: Future Directions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We introduce a Bayesian method for guiding future directions for detection of life on exoplanets. We describe empirical and theoretical work necessary to place constraints on the relevant likelihoods, including those emerging from better understanding stellar environment, planetary climate and geophysics, geochemical cycling, the universalities of physics and chemistry, the contingencies of evolutionary history, the properties of life as an emergent complex system, and the mechanisms driving the emergence of life. We provide examples for how the Bayesian formalism could guide future search strategies, including determining observations to prioritize or deciding between targeted searches or larger lower resolution surveys to generate ensemble statistics and address how a Bayesian methodology could constrain the prior probability of life with or without a positive detection. Key Words: Exoplanets—Biosignatures—Life detection—Bayesian analysis. Astrobiology 18, 779–824.

          Table of Contents

          Related collections

          Most cited references198

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A negative feedback mechanism for the long-term stabilization of Earth's surface temperature

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The large-scale organization of metabolic networks

            In a cell or microorganism the processes that generate mass, energy, information transfer, and cell fate specification are seamlessly integrated through a complex network of various cellular constituents and reactions. However, despite the key role these networks play in sustaining various cellular functions, their large-scale structure is essentially unknown. Here we present the first systematic comparative mathematical analysis of the metabolic networks of 43 organisms representing all three domains of life. We show that, despite significant variances in their individual constituents and pathways, these metabolic networks display the same topologic scaling properties demonstrating striking similarities to the inherent organization of complex non-biological systems. This suggests that the metabolic organization is not only identical for all living organisms, but complies with the design principles of robust and error-tolerant scale-free networks, and may represent a common blueprint for the large-scale organization of interactions among all cellular constituents.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size.

              Networks from a wide range of physical, biological, and social systems have been recently described as "small-world" and "scale-free." However, studies disagree whether ecological networks called food webs possess the characteristic path lengths, clustering coefficients, and degree distributions required for membership in these classes of networks. Our analysis suggests that the disagreements are based on selective use of relatively few food webs, as well as analytical decisions that obscure important variability in the data. We analyze a broad range of 16 high-quality food webs, with 25-172 nodes, from a variety of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Food webs generally have much higher complexity, measured as connectance (the fraction of all possible links that are realized in a network), and much smaller size than other networks studied, which have important implications for network topology. Our results resolve prior conflicts by demonstrating that although some food webs have small-world and scale-free structure, most do not if they exceed a relatively low level of connectance. Although food-web degree distributions do not display a universal functional form, observed distributions are systematically related to network connectance and size. Also, although food webs often lack small-world structure because of low clustering, we identify a continuum of real-world networks including food webs whose ratios of observed to random clustering coefficients increase as a power-law function of network size over 7 orders of magnitude. Although food webs are generally not small-world, scale-free networks, food-web topology is consistent with patterns found within those classes of networks.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Astrobiology
                Astrobiology
                ast
                Astrobiology
                Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. (140 Huguenot Street, 3rd FloorNew Rochelle, NY 10801USA )
                1531-1074
                1557-8070
                01 June 2018
                01 June 2018
                01 June 2018
                : 18
                : 6
                : 779-824
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University , Tempe, Arizona.
                [ 2 ]Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University , Tempe, Arizona.
                [ 3 ]ASU-Santa Fe Institute Center for Biosocial Complex Systems, Arizona State University , Tempe, Arizona.
                [ 4 ]Blue Marble Space Institute of Science , Seattle, Washington.
                [ 5 ]EAPS (Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Science), MIT , Cambridge, Massachusetts.
                [ 6 ]Rufus Scientific Ltd. , Royston, United Kingdom.
                [ 7 ]School of Chemistry, University of Glasgow , Glasgow, United Kingdom.
                [ 8 ]Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland.
                [ 9 ]Department of Materials and Life Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Sophia University , Tokyo, Japan.
                [ 10 ]Earth Life Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology , Tokyo, Japan.
                [ 11 ]NASA Goddard Space Flight Center , Greenbelt, Maryland.
                [ 12 ]NASA Astrobiology Institute, Virtual Planetary Laboratory Team, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
                [ 13 ]Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University , Cambridge, Massachusetts.
                [ 14 ]NASA Astrobiology Institute, Reliving the Past Team, University of Montana , Missoula, Montana.
                [ 15 ]Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Arizona , Tucson, Arizona.
                [ 16 ]Department of Astronomy and Steward Observatory, University of Arizona , Tucson, Arizona.
                [ 17 ]NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies , New York, New York.
                [ 18 ]Department of Earth Science, Rice University , Houston, Texas.
                [ 19 ]School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta, Georgia.
                [ 20 ]NASA Astrobiology Institute, Alternative Earths Team, University of California , Riverside, California.
                [ 21 ]Department of Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Hampton University , Hampton, Virginia.
                [ 22 ]National Institute of Aerospace , Hampton, Virginia.
                [ 23 ]Department of Earth Sciences, University of California , Riverside, California.
                [ 24 ]NASA Postdoctoral Program, Universities Space Research Association , Columbia, Maryland.
                Author notes

                Authors are listed alphabetically with the exception of the first author.

                This article is part of a series of five review articles produced from the 2016 NExSS Exoplanet Biosignatures Workshop Without Walls. All articles in the series are open for community comment until June 2, 2017, at ( https://nexss.info/groups/ebwww/)

                Address correspondence to: Sara I. Walker, School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University PO Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404, E-mail: sara.i.walker@ 123456asu.edu
                Article
                10.1089/ast.2017.1738
                10.1089/ast.2017.1738
                6016573
                29938538
                be5af2d1-6078-41a4-ae44-6c8e735b4f9a
                © Sara I. Walker et al., 2018; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

                This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

                History
                : 08 August 2017
                : 13 March 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 20, Tables: 4, Equations: 17, References: 239, Pages: 46
                Categories
                Special Collection: Exoplanet Biosignatures

                Guest Editors: Mary N. Parenteau, Nancy Y. Kiang, Shawn Domagal-Goldman (in reverse alphabetical order)



                Review Articles

                Comments

                Comment on this article