3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Diplopia-Related Ambulatory and Emergency Department Visits in the United States, 2003-2012

      1 , 2 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 2
      JAMA Ophthalmology
      American Medical Association (AMA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d9651086e288">This secondary analysis of cross-sectional, population-based survey data collected in the United States from 2003 through 2012 assesses the frequency, diagnostic practices, and patient and physician characteristics in diplopia presentations to emergency department and ambulatory settings. </p><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-eoi170093-1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9651086e294">Question</h5> <p id="d9651086e296">How common are diplopia-related visits to ambulatory and emergency department settings in the United States? </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-eoi170093-2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9651086e299">Findings</h5> <p id="d9651086e301">In this prespecified secondary analysis of cross-sectional, population-based survey data collected from 2003 through 2012, there were 804 647 ambulatory and 49 790 emergency department visits annually for diplopia. Most ambulatory visits occurred with ophthalmologists (70.4%), and diplopia was frequently the primary reason for ambulatory setting (48.6%) or emergency department (36.5%) visits. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-eoi170093-3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9651086e304">Meaning</h5> <p id="d9651086e306">Diplopia-related visits are common in the United States, suggesting that future studies defining patient outcomes and association of practice patterns with outcomes should be largely aimed at practices providing eye care. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-eoi170093-4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9651086e310">Importance</h5> <p id="d9651086e312">Diplopia is believed to be a common eye-related symptom. However, to date, there are no available population-based estimates, which are necessary to understand the impact of this disabling symptom on the health care system and to identify steps to optimize patient care. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-eoi170093-5"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9651086e315">Objective</h5> <p id="d9651086e317">To describe diplopia presentations in US ambulatory and emergency department (ED) settings. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-eoi170093-6"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9651086e320">Design, Setting, and Participants</h5> <p id="d9651086e322">Ambulatory and ED visits in the United States by patients with diplopia were analyzed in this prespecified secondary analysis of National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data collected for a 10-year period (2003-2012). Data were analyzed for the present study from October 6, 2016 to August 18, 2017. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-eoi170093-7"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9651086e325">Main Outcomes and Measures</h5> <p id="d9651086e327">Numbers of ambulatory and ED diplopia presentations were estimated using weighted sample data. Weighted proportions of patient and clinician (ie, ophthalmologists, general practitioners, and specialty physicians) characteristics, diagnoses, and imaging use were calculated. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-eoi170093-8"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9651086e330">Results</h5> <p id="d9651086e332">In total, 804 647 (95% CI, 662 075-947 218) ambulatory and 49 790 (95% CI, 38 318-61 262) diplopia-related ED visits occurred annually; 12.3% of ambulatory visits were primarily for acute- or subacute-onset diplopia. Mean (SD) patient age was 62.1 (20.3) years for ambulatory vs 48.1 (22.3) years for diplopia-related ED visits. Most visits primarily for diplopia were by patients 50 years or older (ambulatory, 79.1% [95% CI, 72.9%-84.2%]; ED, 51.8% [95% CI, 41.0%-62.4%]) who were white (ambulatory, 81.7% [95% CI, 74.8%-87.0%]; ED, 86.1% [95% CI, 77.8%-91.6%]) women (ambulatory, 51.1% [95% CI, 44.1-58.1]; ED, 52.8% [95% CI, 41.6%-63.7%]). Most diplopia-related ambulatory visits were conducted by ophthalmologists (70.4% [95% CI, 62.2%-77.5%]) even when symptoms were acute or subacute (89.0% [95% CI, 81.0%-93.9%]). The most common diagnosis in both settings was diplopia ( <i>International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification</i> code 368.2). None of the 10 most frequent diagnoses was life threatening in the ambulatory setting, but approximately 16% of diplopia-related ED visits resulted in a stroke or transient ischemic attack diagnosis. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was ordered in 6.2% (95% CI, 2.8%-12.9%) of ambulatory and 59.7% (95% CI, 38.6%-77.7%) of ED visits, primarily for diplopia. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-eoi170093-9"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9651086e338">Conclusions and Relevance</h5> <p id="d9651086e340">Approximately 850 000 diplopia visits occur in the United States annually; 95% were outpatient visits, and diagnoses were rarely serious in the ambulatory setting but potentially life threatening in 16% of diplopia-related ED visits. Given the low probability of a serious neurologic diagnosis in the ambulatory setting and higher probability in an ED, future cohort studies are needed to define the association of various diagnostic practice patterns, such as imaging, with patient outcomes. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          JAMA Ophthalmology
          JAMA Ophthalmol
          American Medical Association (AMA)
          2168-6165
          December 01 2017
          December 01 2017
          : 135
          : 12
          : 1339
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
          [2 ]Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
          Article
          10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.4508
          6583554
          29075739
          be854356-10f1-49a4-b5a4-31cbd135f4de
          © 2017
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article