30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in long anterior urethral stricture

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVE: To assess the success of buccal mucosal graft (BMG) urethroplasty by the dorsal onlay technique in long anterior urethral stricture (> 2 cm long) through the midline perineal incision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1998 to December 2003, 43 patients with long anterior urethral strictures were managed by dorsal onlay BMG urethroplasty. After voiding trial, they were followed up at 3 months with uroflowmetry, retrograde urethrogram (RGU) and American Urological Association symptoms score (AUA symptoms scores). Successful outcome was defined as normal voiding with a maximum one attempt of VIU after catheter removal. Patients were further followed-up with uroflowmetry at 3 months interval and RGU every 6 months interval. RESULTS: Mean stricture length was 4.8 cm (range 3 to 9 cm) and mean follow up was 48 months (range 12 to 84 months). Only five patients were found to develop stricture at anastomotic site, during follow-up. Two of them voided normally after single attempt of VIU. Other three patients (6.9%) required further open surgery or repeat VIU during follow up and were considered as failure. CONCLUSION: Dorsal onlay BMG urethroplasty is a simple technique with good surgical outcome.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Treatment of male urethral strictures: is repeated dilation or internal urethrotomy useful?

          We evaluate the efficacy of repeated dilation or urethrotomy as treatment of male urethral strictures. Between January 1991 and January 1994, 210 men with proved urethral strictures were prospectively randomized to undergo filiform dilation (106) or internal urethrotomy (104). Followup was scheduled at 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months. Dilation or internal urethrotomy was repeated at the first and second stricture recurrence. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survivor function for the treatment methods (survival time being the time to first stricture recurrence) and the log rank test was used to compare the efficacy of different treatments. Followup (mean 24 months, range 2 to 63) was available in 163 patients (78%). After a single dilation or urethrotomy not followed by re-stricturing at 3 months, the estimated stricture-free rate was 55 to 60% at 24 months and 50 to 60% at 48 months. After a second dilation or urethrotomy for stricture recurrence at 3 months the stricture-free rate was 30 to 50% at 24 months and 0 to 40% at 48 months. After a third dilation or urethrotomy for stricture recurrence at 3 and 6 months the stricture-free rate at 24 months was 0 (p <0.0001). Dilation and internal urethrotomy are useful in a select group (approximately 70% of all patients) who are stricture-free at 3 months, and of whom 50 to 60% will remain stricture-free up to 48 months. A second dilation or urethrotomy for early stricture recurrence (at 3 months) is of limited value in the short term (24 months) but of no value in the long term (48 months), whereas a third repeated dilation or urethrotomy is of no value.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bulbar urethroplasty using buccal mucosa grafts placed on the ventral, dorsal or lateral surface of the urethra: are results affected by the surgical technique?

            The use of buccal mucosa graft onlay urethroplasty represents the most widespread method of bulbar urethral stricture repair. The graft may be placed on the ventral or dorsal urethral surface according to surgeon experience and preference. We investigated whether the results are affected by the surgical technique by comparing the outcome of 3 types of bulbar urethroplasty using buccal mucosa graft. We repaired 50 bulbar urethral strictures with buccal mucosa grafts from 1997 to 2002. Mean patient age was 42 years. The etiology of stricture was ischemia in 12 cases, trauma in 6, instrumentation in 4 and unknown in 28. Patients with lichen sclerosus, failed hypospadias or urethroplasty and stricture extending into the penile urethra were not included. A total of 47 patients (94%) had undergone previous urethrotomy or dilation. The buccal mucosa graft was always harvested from the cheek using a 2 team approach. Mean graft length was 4.2 cm. The graft was placed on the ventral, dorsal and lateral bulbar urethral surface in 17, 27 and 6 cases, respectively. Clinical outcome was considered a success or failure at the time that any postoperative procedure was needed, including dilation. Mean followup was 42 months (range 12 to 76). Of 50 cases 42 (84%) were successful and 8 (16%) failed. The 17 ventral grafts provided success in 14 cases (83%) and failure in 3 (17%). The 27 dorsal grafts provided success in 23 cases (85%) and failure in 4 (15%). The 6 lateral grafts provided success in 5 cases (83%) and failure in 1 (17%). No surgical complications were observed. Failures involved the anastomotic site (distal in 2 and proximal in 3) and the whole grafted area in 3 cases. They were treated with urethrotomy in 5 cases and 2-stage urethroplasty in 3. In our experience the placement of buccal mucosa grafts into the ventral, dorsal or lateral surface of the bulbar urethra showed the same success rates (83% to 85%) and the outcome was not affected by the surgical technique. Moreover, stricture recurrence was uniformly distributed in all patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: is it the new gold standard?

              Whilst techniques for urethral reconstruction have developed in the past few decades the quest for an ideal substitute continues. We critically review the literature on buccal mucosal grafts for substitution urethroplasty, to determine the efficacy and complications arising from its use. Buccal mucosal grafts have proved to be a versatile substitute for strictures attributable to a wide range of causes. Placing the graft dorsally appears to be more successful than ventrally and was successful in 96% of cases; after treating complex urethral strictures with two-stage procedures about a quarter of patients required a revision after the first stage with fewer complications then when skin was used as a substitute. Thus, buccal mucosa is most likely to become the new gold standard for substitution urethroplasty and longer term results with its use are eagerly awaited.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ibju
                International braz j urol
                Int. braz j urol.
                Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil )
                1677-5538
                1677-6119
                April 2007
                : 33
                : 2
                : 181-187
                Affiliations
                [01] Varanasi orgnameBanaras Hindu University orgdiv1Institute of Medical Sciences orgdiv2Department of Urology India
                Article
                S1677-55382007000200008 S1677-5538(07)03300208
                10.1590/S1677-55382007000200008
                be9897d5-9057-4aed-b9b0-fb87bde73064

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 04 October 2006
                : 04 October 2006
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 30, Pages: 7
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Categories
                Clinical Urology

                graft,urethral stricture,buccal mucosa
                graft, urethral stricture, buccal mucosa

                Comments

                Comment on this article