78
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      REVIEW: The evolving linkage between conservation science and practice at The Nature Conservancy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          1. The Nature Conservancy (TNC) was founded by ecologists as a United States land trust to purchase parcels of habitat for the purpose of scientific study. It has evolved into a global organization working in 35 countries ‘to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends’. TNC is now the world 's largest conservation non-governmental organization (NGO), an early adopter of advances in ecological theory and a producer of new science as a result of practising conservation.

          2. The Nature Conservancy 's initial scientific innovation was the use of distributional data for rare species and ecological communities to systematically target lands for conservation. This innovation later evolved into a more rigorous approach known as ‘Conservation by Design’ that contained elements of systematic conservation planning, strategic planning and monitoring and evaluation.

          3. The next scientific transition at TNC was a move to landscape-scale projects, motivated by ideas from landscape ecology. Because the scale at which land could be set aside in areas untouched by humans fell far short of the spatial scale demanded by conservation, TNC became involved with best management practices for forestry, grazing, agriculture, hydropower and other land uses.

          4. A third scientific innovation at TNC came with the pursuit of multiobjective planning that accounts for economic and resource needs in the same plans that seek to protect biodiversity.

          5. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment prompted TNC to become increasingly concerned with ecosystem services and the material risk to people posed by ecosystem deterioration.

          6. Finally, because conservation depends heavily upon negotiation, TNC has recently recruited social scientists, economists and communication experts. One aspect still missing, however, is a solid scientific understanding of thresholds that should be averted.

          7. Synthesis and applications. Over its 60-plus year history, scientific advances have informed The Nature Conservancy (TNC) 's actions and strategies, and in turn the evolving practice of conservation has altered the type of science sought by TNC in order to maximize its conservation effectiveness.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Oyster Reefs at Risk and Recommendations for Conservation, Restoration, and Management

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Designing payments for ecosystem services: Lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms.

            Payments for ecosystem services (PES) policies compensate individuals or communities for undertaking actions that increase the provision of ecosystem services such as water purification, flood mitigation, or carbon sequestration. PES schemes rely on incentives to induce behavioral change and can thus be considered part of the broader class of incentive- or market-based mechanisms for environmental policy. By recognizing that PES programs are incentive-based, policymakers can draw on insights from the substantial body of accumulated knowledge about this class of instruments. In particular, this article offers a set of lessons about how the environmental, socioeconomic, political, and dynamic context of a PES policy is likely to interact with policy design to produce policy outcomes, including environmental effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and poverty alleviation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Why most conservation monitoring is, but need not be, a waste of time.

              Ecological conservation monitoring programmes abound at various organisational and spatial levels from species to ecosystem. Many of them suffer, however, from the lack of details of goal and hypothesis formulation, survey design, data quality and statistical power at the start. As a result, most programmes are likely to fail to reach the necessary standard of being capable of rejecting a false null hypothesis with reasonable power. Results from inadequate monitoring are misleading for their information quality and are dangerous because they create the illusion that something useful has been done. We propose that conservation agencies and those funding monitoring work should require the demonstration of adequate power at the outset of any new monitoring scheme.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Appl Ecol
                J Appl Ecol
                jpe
                The Journal of Applied Ecology
                BlackWell Publishing Ltd (Oxford, UK )
                0021-8901
                1365-2664
                October 2014
                19 May 2014
                : 51
                : 5
                : 1137-1147
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The Nature Conservancy 4722 Latona Avenue NE, Seattle, WA, 91805, USA
                [2 ]The Nature Conservancy 40 E. Main Street, Suite 200, Bozeman, MT, 59715, USA
                [3 ]Department of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Santa Clara University 500 El Camino Real, Santa Clara, CA, 95053, USA
                Author notes
                *Correspondence author. E-mail: pkareiva@ 123456tnc.org

                Handling Editor: Philip Hulme

                Article
                10.1111/1365-2664.12259
                4301179
                25641980
                bec2aaa5-990c-46ea-bbdc-92ed63be3497
                © 2014 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 16 November 2013
                : 25 March 2014
                Categories
                Special Profile: Putting Applied Ecology Into Practice

                Ecology
                biodiversity,conservation,corporate practices,development by design,ecosystem services,education,sustainability

                Comments

                Comment on this article